Wanda Hope Allen v. State ( 2012 )

NO. 07-12-0118-CR
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AT AMARILLO
PANEL C
JUNE 21, 2012
______________________________
WANDA HOPE ALLEN, APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
_________________________________
FROM THE 64TH DISTRICT COURT OF SWISHER COUNTY;
NO. A3960-0506; HONORABLE ROBERT W. KINKAID, JUDGE
_______________________________
Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Pending before this Court is a Motion to Dismiss Appeal filed by Wanda Hope
Allen's counsel in which he represents that Appellant wishes to withdraw her notice of
appeal and dismiss the appeal. The motion is signed by counsel but not by Appellant.
However, attached to the motion is a letter from Appellant to counsel notifying him of
her desire to no longer pursue this appeal. We dismiss this appeal.
Rule 42.2(a) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides that an appeal
may be dismissed if an appellant withdraws his or her notice of appeal by signed motion
accompanied by the signature of the appellant's attorney. The purpose of the
requirement that a motion to dismiss be signed by both the appellant and counsel may
be to protect an appellant from having his or her appeal dismissed by counsel without
consent and to insure that counsel had notice of the dismissal to advise the client on the
consequences of a dismissal. Conners v. State, 966 S.W.2d 108, 110 (Tex.App.--
Houston [1st Dist.] 1998, pet. ref'd).
The decision of whether to take an appeal from a criminal conviction is personal
to the accused. See id. at 110 (citing Jones v. Barnes, 463 U.S. 745, 751, 103 S. Ct.
3308, 77 L. Ed. 2d 987 (1983). Thus, we apply Rule 2 of the Texas Rules of Appellate
Procedure to suspend the requirement in Rule 42.2(a) that Appellant=s signature appear
on the motion to dismiss and accept her letter to counsel expressing her intent as
sufficient to satisfy the spirit of the rule. No decision of this Court having been
delivered, we dismiss the appeal. No motion for rehearing will be entertained and our
mandate will issue forthwith.
Patrick A. Pirtle
Justice
Do not publish.
2