Otto Ray Kietzman v. State ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                                                                     The State of TexasAppellee/s
    Fourth Court of Appeals
    San Antonio, Texas
    June 20, 2014
    No. 04-14-00432-CR
    Otto Ray KIETZMAN,
    Appellant
    v.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS,
    Appellee
    From the Criminal District Court, Magistrate Court, Bexar County, Texas
    Trial Court No. 2013W0631
    Honorable Andrew Carruthers, Judge Presiding
    ORDER
    On February 28, 2014, appellant filed an amended application for writ of habeas corpus
    seeking relief from an extradition order. On March 14, 2014, the trial court signed an order
    denying relief, and appellant filed a timely notice of appeal from that order on March 18, 2014.
    On June 2, 2014, the trial court signed a second order denying relief, and appellant filed a timely
    notice of appeal from that order on June 11, 2014.
    Appellate courts do not have jurisdiction to review a trial court’s refusal to grant an
    application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Hargett, 
    819 S.W.2d 866
    , 868 (Tex. Crim.
    App. 1991). “When a hearing is held on the merits of an applicant’s claim and the court
    subsequently rules on the merits of that claim,” however, “the losing party may appeal.” 
    Id. The clerk’s
    record contains an acknowledgment dated March 14, 2014, referring to a
    transfer of exhibits from the court reporter to the district clerk; therefore, it appears from the
    record that the trial court’s order dated March 14, 2014, was a ruling on the merits of appellant’s
    habeas claim and is an appealable order. The record does not, however, contain any document
    establishing that the trial court’s order dated June 2, 2014, also was a ruling on the merits of
    appellant’s habeas claim. It is therefore ORDERED that appellant show cause in writing within
    two weeks from the date this order is signed why this court has jurisdiction to consider
    appellant’s appeal of the June 2, 2014 order. If appellant fails to respond within the time
    provided, this appeal will proceed only with regard to the trial court’s March 14, 2014 order. All
    other appellate deadlines are SUSPENDED pending further order of this court.
    _________________________________
    Catherine Stone, Chief Justice
    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
    court on this 20th day of June, 2014.
    ___________________________________
    Keith E. Hottle
    Clerk of Court
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-14-00432-CR

Filed Date: 6/20/2014

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015