Julian Lawrence Navarro v. State ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                                                                               The State of
    Fourth Court of Appeals
    San Antonio, Texas
    June 2, 2014
    No. 04-13-00707-CR
    Julian Lawrence NAVARRO,
    Appellant
    v.
    The STATE of Texas,
    Appellee
    From the County Court At Law No 2, Guadalupe County, Texas
    Trial Court No. CCL-12-0325
    Honorable Frank Follis, Judge Presiding
    ORDER
    Appellant’s court-appointed attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
    
    386 U.S. 738
    (1967), in which she asserts there are no meritorious issues to raise on appeal.
    Appellant’s counsel has also filed a motion to withdraw. However, neither the brief nor the
    motion contain an exhibit showing that counsel has informed appellant that he has the right to
    review the record and file a pro se brief. In Nichols v. State, we explained that “[w]hen an
    appointed attorney determines there are no nonfrivolous grounds for appeal, the attorney has a
    duty to request permission to withdraw as counsel.” 
    954 S.W.2d 83
    , 85 (Tex. App.—San
    Antonio 1997, no pet.). We further explained that “[t]he motion to withdraw must also be
    accompanied by an exhibit showing that counsel provided the appellant with a copy of the
    Anders brief and informed the appellant that he or she has a right to review the record and file a
    pro se brief.” 
    Id. at 85-86
    (emphasis added); see also Bruns v. State, 
    924 S.W.2d 176
    , 177 n.1
    (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1996, no pet.). Counsel is reminded that a motion to withdraw filed
    under similar circumstances in any future appeal must be accompanied by an exhibit showing
    that counsel has informed the appellant that he or she has a right to review the record and file a
    pro se brief.
    As to this appeal, appellant has a right to review the record and file a pro se brief. If
    appellant desires to file a pro se brief, he must do so within forty-five days from the date of
    this order. See 
    Bruns, 924 S.W.2d at 177
    n.1. If appellant files a pro se brief, the State may file a
    responsive brief no later than thirty days after the date appellant’s pro se brief is filed in this
    court. We ORDER the motion to withdraw, filed by appellant’s counsel, to be HELD IN
    ABEYANCE pending further order of the court.
    _________________________________
    Karen Angelini, Justice
    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
    court on this 2nd day of June, 2014.
    ___________________________________
    Keith E. Hottle
    Clerk of Court
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-13-00707-CR

Filed Date: 6/2/2014

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015