Rosa Serrano and TLP-EPL Enterprises, Inc. D/B/A the Lens Factory v. Francis Properties I, LTD. ( 2011 )


Menu:
  •                                     COURT OF APPEALS
    EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    EL PASO, TEXAS
    §
    ROSA SERRANO AND TLP-EPL                                         No. 08-11-00190-CV
    ENTERPRISES, INC. D/B/A THE LENS                 §
    FACTORY,                                                            Appeal from the
    §
    Appellants,                                     383rd District Court
    §
    v.                                                             of El Paso County, Texas
    §
    FRANCIS PROPERTIES I, LTD,                                         (TC# 2010-4620)
    §
    Appellee.
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    This appeal is before the Court on its own motion to determine whether the appeal should
    be dismissed for want of prosecution. Finding that Appellants have not filed a brief or a motion for
    extension of time, we dismiss the appeal.
    This Court possesses the authority to dismiss an appeal for want of prosecution when the
    Appellant has failed to file his brief in the time prescribed, and gives no reasonable explanation for
    such failure. TEX . R. APP . P. 38.8(a)(1); Elizondo v. City of San Antonio, 
    975 S.W.2d 61
    , 63 (Tex.
    App. – San Antonio 1998, no writ).
    On September 12, 2011, the Clerk of the Court notified Appellants that their brief was past
    due and no motion for extension of time to file a brief had been received. The Clerk also informed
    the parties of the Court’s intent to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within ten days
    of the notice, a party responded showing grounds to continue the appeal. No response has been
    received as of this date. We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. TEX . R. APP . P. 38.8(a)(1),
    42.3(c).
    Also pending before this Court is Appellants’ motion to consolidate appeals. Having
    dismissed Appellants’ appeal in this case, Appellants’ motion to consolidate appeals is now moot.
    Consequently, the motion is denied as moot.
    GUADALUPE RIVERA, Justice
    November 2, 2011
    Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, J., and Antcliff, J.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 08-11-00190-CV

Filed Date: 11/2/2011

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015