James Darin Meacham v. State ( 2011 )

NO. 07-11-00277-CR
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AT AMARILLO
PANEL A
DECEMBER 16, 2011
JAMES DARIN MEACHAM, APPELLANT
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
FROM THE 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY;
NO. CR2010-425; HONORABLE DIB WALDRIP, JUDGE
Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, James Darin Meacham, appeals from a judgment convicting him of
unauthorized use of a motor vehicle. Due to a defect in the trial court’s certification of
defendant’s right of appeal, this Court abated the case and remanded it back to the trial
court to cure the defect. See Meacham v. State, No. 07-11-0277-CR, 2011 Tex.App.
LEXIS 7508 (Tex.App.—Amarillo Sept. 14, 2011) (order). In response, this Court
received a supplemental clerk’s record that contains an Amended Certification of
Defendant’s Right of Appeal that indicates that appellant has waived his right of appeal.
This certification is in the proper form, is signed by appellant, and is supported by the
record.
By letter dated November 9, 2011, this Court notified appellant that the
certification reflected that appellant had no right of appeal. By this letter, the Court
further notified appellant failure to file an amended certification showing a right of appeal
or other grounds for continuing the appeal on or before December 9, 2011, would result
in dismissal of the appeal pursuant to Rule 25.2(a)(2) and (d) of the Texas Rules of
Appellate Procedure. No response or amended certification reflecting appellant’s right
of appeal has been made part of the record.
Consequently, the appeal is dismissed.
Mackey K. Hancock
Justice
Do not publish.
2