Derrick Lynn Lewis v. State ( 2011 )


Menu:
  •                                   NO. 07-11-0444-CR
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    AT AMARILLO
    PANEL C
    NOVEMBER 29, 2011
    ______________________________
    DERRICK LYNN LEWIS, APPELLANT
    V.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
    _________________________________
    FROM THE 27TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY;
    NO. 63971; HONORABLE JOE CARROLL, JUDGE
    _______________________________
    Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.
    ABATEMENT AND REMAND
    Following a plea of not guilty, Appellant, Derrick Lynn Lewis, was convicted of
    capital murder and punishment was assessed at life without parole. On March 7, 2011,
    Appellant filed his notice of appeal. The appellate record has been filed and Appellant's
    brief was originally due on August 17, 2011.      After the Eleventh Court of Appeals
    granted two extensions of time in which to file Appellant's brief, the brief was due on
    October 10, 2011. As grounds for the first two requests for extensions, counsel cited
    his work schedule as well as the transfer of this appeal from the Third Court of Appeals
    to the Eleventh Court of Appeals.1 The appeal was then transferred to this Court.2 The
    brief remained outstanding and by letter dated October 28, 2011, the Clerk of this Court
    advised Appellant's counsel that the brief had not been filed and set a deadline of
    November 7, 2011, in which to do so together with a Motion to Extend Time to File
    Appellant's Brief. Counsel was cautioned that failure to timely file the brief and motion
    would result in abatement of the appeal and remand of the cause to the trial court
    without further notice pursuant to Rule 38.8(b)(2) and (3) of the Texas Rules of
    Appellate Procedure. In response, on November 4, 2011, instead of filing Appellant's
    brief, counsel filed a third Motion to Extend Time to File Appellant's Brief citing ”an
    unusually heavy caseload."3
    By letter dated November 7, 2011, the request for a third extension was denied;
    however, counsel was given until November 17, 2011, in which to file the brief with the
    unequivocal admonishment that failure to comply would result in abatement and
    remand. Notwithstanding this Court's letters of October 28 and November 7, counsel
    filed a fourth Motion to Extend Time to File Appellant's Brief requesting additional time
    to prepare the brief. As grounds, counsel asserts that he needs additional time to
    1
    This appeal was originally transferred from the Third Court of Appeals to the Eleventh Court of Appeals
    by an order of the Texas Supreme Court pursuant to its docket equalization efforts. Tex. Gov=t Code Ann.
    ' 73.001 (West 2005).
    2
    This appeal was subsequently transferred from the Eleventh Court of Appeals to this Court by an order
    of the Supreme Court due to the earlier transfer of a companion case from the Third Court of Appeals to
    the Seventh Court of Appeals.
    3
    This Court does not grant requests for subsequent extensions absent good cause. The normal press of
    business is not considered good cause. See Curry v. Clayton, 
    715 S.W.2d 77
    , 79 (Tex.App.--Dallas
    1986, no writ).
    2
    prepare a new point of error which was raised in the brief of Appellant's co-defendant,
    Andre Hamilton, but which had not previously occurred to counsel.
    By Order of the Court, Appellant's fourth Motion to Extend Time to File
    Appellant's Brief is denied. Instead, we now abate this appeal and remand the cause to
    the trial court to determine the following:
    1.     whether Appellant desires to prosecute the appeal;
    2.     whether Appellant has been denied effective assistance of counsel
    given counsel's failure to timely file the brief; and
    3.     whether Appellant is entitled to new appointed counsel.
    Should it be determined that Appellant does want to continue the appeal and the trial
    court determines he is entitled to new appointed counsel, the name, address, telephone
    number, and state bar number of the newly-appointed counsel shall be provided to the
    Clerk of this Court. The trial court shall execute findings of fact and conclusions of law,
    and shall cause its findings, conclusions, and any necessary orders to be included in a
    supplemental clerk's record to be filed with the Clerk of this Court by December 16,
    2011. Finally, newly appointed counsel shall file Appellant's brief within thirty days after
    the date of appointment.
    It is so ordered.
    Per Curiam
    Do not publish.
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 07-11-00444-CR

Filed Date: 11/29/2011

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015