Ricky Ramos v. State ( 2010 )


Menu:
  • Becker v. State

    COURT OF APPEALS

    EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

    EL PASO, TEXAS



    RICKY RAMOS,


                                        Appellant,


    v.


    THE STATE OF TEXAS,


                                        Appellee.

    §

    §

    §

    §

    §


    §


    No. 08-10-00090-CR


    Appeal from

     371st District Court


    of Tarrant County, Texas


    (TC # 1161510D)

     

     

     


    MEMORANDUM OPINION


                Ricky Ramos appeals his conviction of burglary of a habitation. Appellant waived his right to a jury trial and entered a negotiated plea of guilty. In accordance with the plea bargain, the trial court placed Appellant on deferred adjudication community supervision for five years. The State subsequently filed a motion to adjudicate alleging several violations of the terms and conditions of community supervision. Based on Appellant’s plea of true to several of the alleged violations, the trial court granted the State’s motion, adjudicated Appellant guilty, and assessed his punishment at imprisonment for a term of five years. We affirm.

                Appellant’s court-appointed counsel has filed a brief in which she has concluded that the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493, reh. denied, 388 U.S. 924, 87 S. Ct. 2094, 18 L. Ed. 2d 1377 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex.Crim.App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex.Crim.App. 1974); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex.Crim.App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.Crim.App. 1969). A copy of counsel’s brief has been delivered to Appellant, and Appellant has been advised of his right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed.

                We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel’s brief, and agree that the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. The judgment is affirmed.


    December 15, 2010                                                    

                                                                                        ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Justice


    Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Rivera, JJ.


    (Do Not Publish)