Tiffney Lynne McAdoo v. State ( 2012 )


Menu:
  •                         COURT OF APPEALS
    SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    FORT WORTH
    NO. 02-12-00434-CR
    Tiffney Lynne McAdoo                   §    From the 372nd District Court
    §    of Tarrant County (1247940R)
    v.                                     §    December 13, 2012
    §    Per Curiam
    The State of Texas                     §    (nfp)
    JUDGMENT
    This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that
    the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for
    want of jurisdiction.
    SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS
    PER CURIAM
    COURT OF APPEALS
    SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    FORT WORTH
    NO. 02-12-00434-CR
    NO. 02-12-00435-CR
    TIFFNEY LYNNE MCADOO                                                APPELLANT
    V.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS                                                       STATE
    ----------
    FROM THE 372ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY
    ----------
    MEMORANDUM OPINION1
    ----------
    Appellant Tiffney Lynne McAdoo attempts to appeal following her pleas of
    guilty to theft of property valued between $1,500 and $20,000 from an elderly
    individual and to making a false statement to obtain property or credit. See Tex.
    Penal Code Ann. § 31.03(e)(4), (f) (West Supp. 2012); 
    id. § 32.32
    (West 2011).
    Following the plea agreements, the trial court sentenced Appellant to five years’
    1
    See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
    2
    incarceration in each case but suspended her sentence, ordering that Appellant
    be placed on community supervision for five years and that Appellant make
    restitution.
    The trial court’s certifications of Appellant’s right to appeal state in each
    case that this “is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.”
    See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). On September 17, 2012, we notified Appellant
    that these appeals could be dismissed unless she or any party desiring to
    continue the appeals filed a response showing grounds for continuing the
    appeals. We have to date not received any response.
    The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure are clear that in a plea-bargain
    case, an appellant may appeal only those matters that were raised by written
    motion filed and ruled on before trial or after getting the trial court’s permission to
    appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). Because the trial court’s certifications
    reflect that Appellant has no right of appeal, we dismiss these appeals for want of
    jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d), 43.2(f).
    PER CURIAM
    PANEL: GARDNER, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ.
    DO NOT PUBLISH
    Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
    DELIVERED: December 13, 2012
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 02-12-00434-CR

Filed Date: 12/13/2012

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015