Tiffney Lynne McAdoo v. State ( 2012 )


Menu:
  • 02-12-434, 435-CR


    COURT OF APPEALS

    SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

    FORT WORTH

     

     

     

     

    NO. 02-12-00434-CR

     

     

    Tiffney Lynne McAdoo

     

     

     

    v.

     

     

     

    The State of Texas

    §

     

    §

     

    §

     

    §

     

    §

    From the 372nd District Court

     

    of Tarrant County (1247940R)

     

    December 13, 2012

     

    Per Curiam

     

    (nfp)

     

    JUDGMENT

              This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the appeal should be dismissed.  It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

     

    SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

     

     

     

    PER CURIAM

     

     

     

     


    COURT OF APPEALS

    SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

    FORT WORTH

     

     

     

     

    NO.  02-12-00434-CR

    NO.  02-12-00435-CR

     

     

    TIFFNEY LYNNE MCADOO

     

    APPELLANT

     

    V.

     

    The State of Texas

     

    STATE

     

     

    ----------

    FROM THE 372ND District Court OF Tarrant COUNTY

    ----------

    MEMORANDUM OPINION[1]

    ----------

    Appellant Tiffney Lynne McAdoo attempts to appeal following her pleas of guilty to theft of property valued between $1,500 and $20,000 from an elderly individual and to making a false statement to obtain property or credit.  See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 31.03(e)(4), (f) (West Supp. 2012); id. § 32.32 (West 2011). Following the plea agreements, the trial court sentenced Appellant to five years’ incarceration in each case but suspended her sentence, ordering that Appellant be placed on community supervision for five years and that Appellant make restitution.

    The trial court’s certifications of Appellant’s right to appeal state in each case that this “is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.”  See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2).  On September 17, 2012, we notified Appellant that these appeals could be dismissed unless she or any party desiring to continue the appeals filed a response showing grounds for continuing the appeals.  We have to date not received any response.

    The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure are clear that in a plea-bargain case, an appellant may appeal only those matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial or after getting the trial court’s permission to appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2).  Because the trial court’s certifications reflect that Appellant has no right of appeal, we dismiss these appeals for want of jurisdiction.  See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d), 43.2(f).

     

    PER CURIAM

     

    PANEL: GARDNER, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ.

     

    DO NOT PUBLISH

    Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

     

    DELIVERED:  December 13, 2012



    [1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Document Info

Docket Number: 02-12-00434-CR

Filed Date: 12/13/2012

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015