Mario Elliott Young v. State ( 2014 )

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE
FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
ORDER OF ABATEMENT
Appellate case name: Mario Elliott Young v. The State of Texas
Appellate case number: 01-14-00009-CR
Trial court case number: 69418
Trial court: 239th District Court of Brazoria County
We are in receipt of an information sheet from the court reporter stating the record has
not been requested or paid for and the appellant is not appealing as indigent. Trial counsel for
Young filed the Notice of Appeal, and is therefore currently showing as counsel of record on this
appeal. The record is unclear; however, as to whether trial counsel has been retained or
appointed for the appeal, and also as to whether Young intends to appeal as indigent.
As such, we abate this appeal and remand the case to the trial court for a hearing at which
appellant and trial counsel shall be present in person. 1 The court coordinator of the trial court
shall set a date for said hearing and notify the parties, including appellant. We direct the trial
court to make appropriate written findings of fact and conclusions of law and to execute any
necessary orders on these issues:
1) Whether appellant still wishes to pursue this appeal;
2) If so, whether to allow trial counsel to withdraw;
3) Whether appellant is now indigent and entitled to appointed counsel; and, if
indigent,
a. appoint counsel on appeal, and
b. order the court reporter to file the reporter’s record with this Court at no
cost to appellant;
4) If appellant is not indigent:
a. whether he has retained an attorney to file a brief, and, if so, obtain the
1 If appellant is now incarcerated, he may appear by closed video teleconference. Any such teleconference
must use a closed-circuit video teleconferencing system that provides for a simultaneous compressed full
motion video and interactive communication of image and sound between the trial court, appellant, and any
attorneys representing the State or appellant. On request, appellant and his counsel shall be able to
communicate privately without being recorded or heard by the trial court or the attorney representing the
State.
name, address, and telephone number of retained counsel;
b. if appellant has not retained counsel, the trial court shall admonish
appellant of the dangers and disadvantages of self-representation, and
i. determine whether appellant is knowingly and intelligently
waiving his right to counsel; or,
ii. if appellant does not wish to proceed pro se, provide a deadline by
which appellant must hire an attorney.
See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 1.051(a), (f); Oliver v. State, 872 S.W.2d 713, 716 (Tex.
Crim. App. 1994); Minjares v. State, 577 S.W.2d 222, 224 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); cf. TEX.
CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 1.051(g).
The trial court shall have a court reporter, or court recorder, record the hearing and file
the reporter’s record with the Court no later than 30 days from the date of this order.
Additionally, the trial court’s findings and recommendations and any orders issued pursuant to
this hearing shall be included in a supplemental clerk’s record and filed in this Court no later
than 30 days from the date of this order. If the hearing is conducted by video teleconference, a
certified electronic copy of the hearing shall be filed in this Court no later than 30 days from the
date of this order.
The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court’s active
docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this Court’s active docket when the supplemental
clerk’s record and reporter’s record of the hearing are filed in this Court.
It is so ORDERED.
Judge’s signature: /s/ Justice Harvey Brown
X Acting individually  Acting for the Court
Date: March 25, 2014