in the Interest of R.L.R.R., M.C.M., J.D.S. and G.Z.S. ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                                Fourth Court of Appeals
    San Antonio, Texas
    February 24, 2014
    No. 04-13-00904-CV
    IN THE INTEREST OF R.L.R.R., M.C.M., J.D.S. AND G.Z.S.,
    From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
    Trial Court No. 2013-PA-00325
    Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding
    ORDER
    This is an accelerated appeal from a judgment terminating appellant, Pablo B.’s parental
    rights.1 On February 10, 2014, Pablo B.’s court-appointed appellate counsel, Mr. Gerald
    Uretsky, filed a motion to extend time until March 3, 2014 to file Pablo B.s’ appellate brief.
    Two days later, Mr. Uretsky filed a motion to withdraw and brief pursuant to Anders v.
    California, 
    386 U.S. 738
    (1967), in which he asserts there are no meritorious issues to raise on
    appeal. See In re R. R., No. 04-03-00096-CV, 
    2003 WL 21157944
    (Tex. App.–San Antonio,
    May 21, 2003, order) (holding that Anders procedures apply to appeals from orders terminating
    parental rights), disp. on merits, 
    2003 WL 22080522
    (Tex. App.–San Antonio, Sept. 10, 2003, no
    pet.) (mem. op.). Counsel states he has informed Pablo B. of his right to review the record and
    file his own brief. See id.; Nichols v. State, 
    954 S.W.2d 83
    , 85-86 (Tex. App.—San Antonio, July
    23, 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State, 
    924 S.W.2d 176
    , 177 n.1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1996, no
    pet.).
    On February 20, 2014, the State filed a notice waiving its right to file a brief in this case
    unless Pablo B. files a pro se brief. If Pablo B. desires to file a pro se brief, we order that he
    do so on or before March 27, 2014. If Pablo B. timely files a pro se brief, the State may file a
    responsive brief no later than thirty days after Pablo B.’s pro se brief is filed in this court.
    We order that Mr. Uretsky’s motion to withdraw is held in abeyance pending further
    order of the court. We further order that Mr. Uretsky’s motion to extend time in which to file
    appellant’s brief is GRANTED.
    We order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on appellant and all counsel.
    1
    A second appeal from the trial court’s termination order has been filed by Raymond R., who is represented on
    appeal by Mr. Joseph Bohac. Mr. Bohac filed a brief on the merits on behalf of Raymond B. and the State’s
    appellee’s brief is due March 3, 2014.
    _________________________________
    Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
    court on this 24th day of February, 2014.
    ___________________________________
    Keith E. Hottle
    Clerk of Court
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-13-00904-CV

Filed Date: 2/24/2014

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015