Burton Kahn v. Helvetia Asset Recovery Inc. ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                                                                       Helvetia Asset Recovery
    Fourth Court of Appeals
    San Antonio, Texas
    February 24, 2014
    No. 04-14-00012-CV
    Burton KAHN,
    Appellant
    v.
    HELVETIA ASSET RECOVERY INC.,
    Appellee
    From the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
    Trial Court No. 2013-CI-18355
    Honorable Karen H. Pozza, Judge Presiding
    ORDER
    In this interlocutory appeal, Appellant Burton Kahn filed a notice of appeal stating the
    following:
    Defendant Burton Kahn desires to appeal from the cause number 2013CI18355.
    The Court did not rule on Plaintiff being a Foreign Corporation and is
    Maintaining Suit Without a Certificate of Authority by the court 407th Judicial
    District Bexar County, Texas on December 11, 2013.
    In an order dated January 23, 2014, we explained that it appeared from his notice of appeal that
    Kahn is complaining the trial court did not rule on his Motion to Show Authority at a hearing
    held on December 11, 2013. Thus, Kahn’s notice of appeal did not point to an appealable
    interlocutory order, but instead complained of a trial court’s failure to rule on a motion. We
    explained that we have no jurisdiction over a trial court’s failure to rule on a motion in an
    interlocutory appeal.
    This court has jurisdiction over appeals from final judgments or orders. A judgment or
    order is final for purposes of appeal if it actually disposes of all pending parties and claims
    before the court. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 
    39 S.W.3d 191
    , 195 (Tex. 2001). Here, there is no
    final judgment or order. Interlocutory orders may be appealed only if a specific statute authorizes
    such an interlocutory appeal. In Kahn’s response to our show cause order, he states that he is
    appealing from the trial court’s temporary injunction. Section 51.014(a)(4) of the Texas Civil
    Practice and Remedies Code states that a person may appeal from an interlocutory order that
    “grants or refuses a temporary injunction or grants or overrules a motion to dissolve a temporary
    injunction as provide by Chapter 65.” See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. ' 51.014(a)(4).
    Because the temporary injunction granted in this case is an appealable interlocutory order, we
    retain this case on the docket of this court and reinstate appellate deadlines.
    Because the clerk’s and reporter’s records have been filed, we ORDER appellant to file
    his brief on or before March 17, 2014.
    _________________________________
    Karen Angelini, Justice
    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
    court on this 24th day of February, 2014.
    ___________________________________
    Keith E. Hottle
    Clerk of Court
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-14-00012-CV

Filed Date: 2/24/2014

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015