Paul Leymon Paige v. State ( 2014 )


Menu:
  • Opinion issued February 13, 2014
    In The
    Court of Appeals
    For The
    First District of Texas
    ————————————
    NO. 01-13-00666-CR
    ———————————
    PAUL LEYMON PAIGE, Appellant
    V.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
    On Appeal from the 185th District Court
    Harris County, Texas
    Trial Court Case No. 1387998
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Appellant, Paul Leymon Paige, pleaded guilty to the state jail felony offense
    of possession of a controlled substance.1 The trial court found appellant guilty and,
    in accordance with the terms of appellant’s plea bargain agreement with the State,
    1
    See TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. § 481.115(a), (b) (West 2010).
    sentenced appellant to ten months’ confinement. Appellant filed a pro se notice of
    appeal. We dismiss the appeal.
    In a plea bargain case, a defendant may only appeal those matters that were
    raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial or after getting the trial
    court’s permission to appeal. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 44.02 (West
    2006); TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). An appeal must be dismissed if a certification
    showing that the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the
    record. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).
    Here, the trial court’s certification is included in the record on appeal. See 
    id. The trial
    court’s certification states that this is a plea bargain case and that the
    defendant has no right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). The record
    supports the trial court’s certification. See Dears v. State, 
    154 S.W.3d 610
    , 615
    (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Because appellant has no right of appeal, we must
    dismiss this appeal. See Chavez v. State, 
    183 S.W.3d 675
    , 680 (Tex. Crim. App.
    2006) (“A court of appeals, while having jurisdiction to ascertain whether an
    appellant who plea-bargained is permitted to appeal by Rule 25.2(a)(2), must
    dismiss a prohibited appeal without further action, regardless of the basis for the
    appeal.”).
    Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. We dismiss any
    pending motions as moot.
    2
    PER CURIAM
    Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Massengale and Huddle.
    Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 01-13-00666-CR

Filed Date: 2/13/2014

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015