Larry Stanley and Terri Stanley v. John McClanahan ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                                  COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE
    FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
    ORDER
    Appellate case name:      Larry Stanley and Terri Stanley v. John McClanahan
    Appellate case number:    01-13-00982-CV
    Trial court case number: D-13-5,197
    Trial court:              County Court of Colorado County
    In this forcible-detainer action, appellants, Larry Stanley and Terry Stanley, have filed an
    “Emergency Motion to Stay Writ of Possession.” Appellants are not entitled to a stay in this
    case because they did not file a supersedeas bond within 10 days of the county court’s judgment.
    See TEX. PROP. CODE ANN. § 24.007 (West Supp. 2013) (“A judgment of a county court in an
    eviction suit may not under any circumstances be stayed pending appeal unless, within 10 days
    of the signing of the judgment, the appellant files a supersedeas bond in an amount set by the
    county court.”); In re Campbell, No. 03-13-00712-CV, 
    2013 WL 5878895
    , at *1 (Tex. App.—
    Austin Oct. 30, 2013, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.) (“An appellate court may not stay the
    judgment unless a supersedeas bond in accordance with section 24.007 has been filed.”); Holmes
    v. Al Jaafreh, No. 10-11-00320-CV, 
    2013 WL 2399059
    , at *1 n. 1 (Tex. App.—Waco May 30,
    2013, no pet.) (mem. op.) (noting denial of emergency request to stay execution of writ of
    possession because appellant failed to file supersedeas bond); Phillips v. Branch Banking &
    Trust Co., No. 03-11-00461-CV, 
    2012 WL 424875
    , at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin Feb. 1, 2012,
    order) (denying emergency motion to stay execution of writ of possession because appellant did
    not post supersedeas bond in accordance with section 24.007); see also Wilhelm v. Fed. Nat’l
    Mortg. Ass’n, 
    349 S.W.3d 766
    , 768 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2011, no pet.) (“If a
    supersedeas bond in the amount set by the trial court is not filed, the judgment in a forcible-
    detainer action may be enforced and a writ of possession may be executed evicting the defendant
    from the premises in question.”). Appellants’ motion is DENIED.1
    It is so ORDERED.
    1
    We note that appellants vacated the property on November 7, 2013, 12 days before they
    filed their emergency motion.
    Judge’s signature: /s/ Laura C. Higley
     Acting individually    Acting for the Court
    Date: February 4, 2014
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 01-13-00982-CV

Filed Date: 2/4/2014

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015