Fire Insurance Exchange v. Judy Kennedy ( 2012 )


Menu:
  •                          COURT OF APPEALS
    SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    FORT WORTH
    NO. 02-12-00274-CR
    KELLY K. MCKIM                                                      APPELLANT
    V.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS                                                       STATE
    ----------
    FROM THE 371ST DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY
    ----------
    MEMORANDUM OPINION1
    ----------
    The State charged Appellant Kelly K. McKim with the state jail felony of
    prostitution with three or more previous convictions,2 enhanced to a third-degree
    felony.3 In a plea bargain, the State waived the enhancement count and agreed to
    recommend a six-month sentence in a state jail facility as long as Appellant
    1
    See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
    2
    See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 43.02(c)(2) (West Supp. 2012).
    3
    See 
    id. § 12.425(a).
    appeared for sentencing on April 30, 2012 at 9:00 a.m. Otherwise, Appellant’s guilty
    plea would be “open” to the trial court for punishment. Appellant signed the judicial
    confession and waivers but did not appear on April 30, 2012. When she did appear,
    the trial court accepted her guilty plea and sentenced her to twenty months’
    confinement in a state jail facility. Appellant filed a timely, pro se notice of appeal.
    The trial court’s certification states that this is a plea-bargained case and that
    Appellant has no right of appeal. Accordingly, we informed her by letter on June 22,
    2012, that this case was subject to dismissal unless she or any party showed
    grounds for continuing the appeal within ten days.4 In her response, Appellant
    argues     that   because   the   punishment     exceeds     the   State’s   six-month
    recommendation, it is not a plea-bargained sentence. We disagree.
    The twenty-month sentence imposed falls within the range of confinement for
    a state jail felony5 but does not reach two years, the minimum term of confinement
    for a third-degree felony.6 The judgment reflects the State’s waiver of the sentence
    enhancement count. Because that waiver capped Appellant’s confinement at two
    years rather than ten years, we agree with the trial court’s determination that this is
    4
    See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), 25.2(d).
    5
    See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 12.35(a) (West Supp. 2012).
    6
    See 
    id. § 12.34(a)
    (West 2011).
    2
    a plea-bargained case—specifically, a charge bargain.7 We therefore dismiss this
    appeal.8
    PER CURIAM
    PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.
    DO NOT PUBLISH
    Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
    DELIVERED: September 20, 2012
    7
    See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2); Chavez v. State, 
    183 S.W.3d 675
    , 680 (Tex.
    Crim. App. 2006); Shankle v. State, 
    119 S.W.3d 808
    , 813–14 (Tex. Crim. App.
    2003).
    8
    See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d), 43.2(f).
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 02-11-00437-CV

Filed Date: 9/20/2012

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015