Jose Moreno v. State ( 2013 )


Menu:
  • DISMISS; Opinion issued May 6, 2013
    S  In The
    Court of Appeals
    Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
    No. 05-13-00542-CR
    No. 05-13-00543-CR
    JOSE MORENO, Appellant
    V.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
    On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 5
    Dallas County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause Nos. F12-54982-L, F12-70797-L
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Before Justices O’Neill, Francis, and Fillmore
    Opinion by Justice Francis
    Jose Moreno was convicted of two aggravated assault with a deadly weapon offenses.
    Punishment, enhanced by one prior felony conviction, was assessed at imprisonment for twenty
    years in each case. The sentences were imposed in open court on February 20, 2013. No timely
    motions for new trial were filed; therefore, appellant’s notices of appeal were due by March 22,
    2013. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1). Appellant’s pro se notice of appeal is hand-dated April 11,
    2013 and is file-stamped April 19, 2013. The envelope in which it was mailed is post-marked
    either April 12 or 17, 2013. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.2(b).
    Assuming, without deciding, that the pro se notice of appeal was delivered to jail
    authorities for mailing on or before April 12, 2013, it would have been considered filed within
    the fifteen-day extension period provided by rule 26.3. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3(a); Campbell v.
    State, 
    320 S.W.3d 338
    , 344 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010). However, to obtain the benefit of the
    extension period, appellant also had to file an extension motion in this Court within that same
    fifteen-day period. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3(b); Slaton v. State, 
    981 S.W.2d 208
    , 210 (Tex.
    Crim. App. 1998) (per curiam); Boyd v. State, 
    971 S.W.2d 603
    , 605–06 (Tex. App.––Dallas
    1998, no pet.). Appellant did not file a motion to extend time to file his notices of appeal in this
    Court.
    Because appellant’s April 11, 2013 pro se notice of appeal is untimely as to the February
    20, 2013 sentencing date, we have no jurisdiction over the appeals.
    We dismiss the appeals for want of jurisdiction.
    /Molly Francis/
    MOLLY FRANCIS
    JUSTICE
    Do Not Publish
    TEX. R. APP. P. 47
    130542F.U05
    –2–
    S
    Court of Appeals
    Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
    JUDGMENT
    JOSE MORENO, Appellant                             On Appeal from the Criminal District Court
    No. 5, Dallas County, Texas
    No. 05-13-00542-CR        V.                       Trial Court Cause No. F12-54982-L.
    Opinion delivered by Justice Francis,
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee                       Justices O’Neill and Fillmore participating.
    Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal for want of
    jurisdiction.
    Judgment entered May 6, 2013.
    /Molly Francis/
    MOLLY FRANCIS
    JUSTICE
    –3–
    S
    Court of Appeals
    Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
    JUDGMENT
    JOSE MORENO, Appellant                             On Appeal from the Criminal District Court
    No. 5, Dallas County, Texas
    No. 05-13-00543-CR        V.                       Trial Court Cause No. F12-70797-L.
    Opinion delivered by Justice Francis,
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee                       Justices O’Neill and Fillmore participating.
    Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal for want of
    jurisdiction.
    Judgment entered May 6, 2013.
    /Molly Francis/
    MOLLY FRANCIS
    JUSTICE
    –4–
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 05-13-00542-CR

Filed Date: 5/6/2013

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015