Daniel James Weems v. State ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                                                                                                The
    Fourth Court of Appeals
    San Antonio, Texas
    January 29, 2014
    No. 04-14-00001-CR
    Daniel James WEEMS,
    Appellant
    v.
    The STATE of Texas,
    Appellee
    From the 38th Judicial District Court, Medina County, Texas
    Trial Court No. 12-12-11120-CR
    Honorable Camile G. Dubose, Judge Presiding
    ORDER
    The trial court imposed sentence in the underlying cause on September 11, 2013.
    Because appellant did not file a timely motion for new trial, the notice of appeal was due to be
    filed October 11, 2013. 1 TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1). A motion for extension of time to file the
    notice of appeal was due on October 28, 2013. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3. On October 28, 2013,
    appellant filed a notice of appeal 2 and a motion for extension of time in the trial court.
    A timely notice of appeal is necessary to invoke a court of appeals’ jurisdiction. See
    Olivo v. State, 
    918 S.W.2d 519
    , 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). A late notice of appeal may be
    considered timely so as to invoke a court of appeals’ jurisdiction if (1) it is filed within fifteen
    days of the last day allowed for filing, (2) a motion for extension of time is filed in the court of
    appeals within fifteen days of the last day allowed for filing the notice of appeal, and (3) the
    court of appeals grants the motion for extension of time. See 
    id. Although appellant
    filed the
    notice of appeal and motion for extension of time within the fifteen day grace period, appellant
    filed his motion for extension of time with the trial court instead of with this court. It is therefore
    ORDERED that appellant show cause in writing within two weeks from the date of this order
    1
    The deadline for filing the motion for new trial was October 11, 2013, and the motion for new trial was not filed
    until October 28, 2013. In an amended notice of appeal, appellant’s attorney makes reference to the appellant
    having tendered his motion for new trial to his jailors on October 16, 2013; however, October 16, 2013 was after the
    October 11, 2013 deadline.
    2
    We liberally construe appellant’s letter requesting the trial court’s permission to appeal as a notice of appeal.
    why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. 3 See id.; see also Ater v. Eighth
    Court of Appeals, 
    802 S.W.2d 241
    (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (out-of-time appeal from final felony
    conviction may be sought by filing a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to article 11.07 of the Texas
    Code of Criminal Procedure). All other appellate deadlines are SUSPENDED pending this
    court’s resolution of the jurisdictional issue.
    _________________________________
    Catherine Stone, Chief Justice
    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
    court on this 29th day of January, 2014.
    ___________________________________
    Keith E. Hottle
    Clerk of Court
    3
    We also note the trial court’s certification in this appeal states that “this criminal case is a plea-bargain case, and
    the defendant has NO right of appeal.” The clerk’s record contains a written plea bargain, and the punishment
    assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant; therefore,
    the trial court’s certification accurately reflects that the criminal case is a plea-bargain case. See TEX. R. APP. P.
    25.2(a)(2). Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides, “The appeal must be dismissed if a
    certification that shows the defendant has a right of appeal has not been made part of the record under these rules.”
    TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-14-00001-CR

Filed Date: 1/29/2014

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015