Wells Fargo Bank, National Association v. Catherine D. Koehler Trust, Mary Catherine Schooler Trust, and Louise Trammell Trust ( 2010 )


Menu:
  • NO.  07-10-0208-CV

                                                                 

                                                       IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

     

                                           FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

     

                                                                     AT AMARILLO

     

                                                                         PANEL D

     

                                                               DECEMBER 8, 2010

     

                                                ______________________________

     

     

    WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

     

                                                                                                                            Appellant

                                                                                 v.

     

                    CATHERINE D. KOEHLER TRUST AND LOUISE TRAMMEL TRUST,

     

                                                                                                                            Appellees

                                             _________________________________

     

                           FROM THE 108TH DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

     

                             NO. 98,287-E; HON. DOUGLAS WOODBURN, PRESIDING

                                               _______________________________

     

    Memorandum Opinion

    _______________________________

     

    Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ.

                Pending before the court is the joint motion of appellant Wells Fargo Bank, National Association and appellees, the Catherine D. Koehler Trust and the Louise Trammell Conley Trust, to reverse the trial court’s judgment and remand the cause.  The movants represent they have settled their dispute but that the settlement necessitates entry by the trial court.  Thus, they request that the judgment be reversed and the cause remanded to the trial court to reinvest it with jurisdiction to consider the compromise. Therefore, we grant the motion.

                Accordingly, the judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 43.2(d) and Dunn v. Canadian Oil & Gas Serv., Inc., 908 S.W.2d 323 (Tex.App.El Paso 1995, no writ).

     

                                                                            Brian Quinn

                                                                          Chief Justice

                           

     

     

Document Info

Docket Number: 07-10-00208-CV

Filed Date: 12/8/2010

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015