William Mayo v. Technical Transportation ( 2012 )

COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH
NO. 02-11-00331-CV
WILLIAM MAYO APPELLANT
V.
TECHNICAL TRANSPORTATION APPELLEE
------------
FROM THE 352ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY
------------
MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT
------------
We have considered the parties’ “Agreed Motion For Remand.” The
motion is GRANTED. We set aside, without regard to the merits, the trial court=s
judgment and remand this case to the trial court for further proceedings in
accordance with the parties’ agreement. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B);
Innovative Office Sys., Inc. v. Johnson, 911 S.W.2d 387, 388 (Tex. 1995); In re
Ortega, 225 S.W.3d 610, 610–11 (Tex. App.––El Paso 2006, no pet.).
1
See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the party incurring the same, for which
let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.
PER CURIAM
PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.
DELIVERED: March 15, 2012
2