Parminder Singh and Simer Singh v. Span International, Inc. D/B/A PTAC Direct Sales ( 2012 )

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-11-00413-CV PARMINDER SINGH AND SIMER APPELLANTS SINGH V. SPAN INTERNATIONAL, INC. D/B/A APPELLEE PTAC DIRECT SALES ------------ FROM THE 67TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY ------------ MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ------------ On January 20, 2012, we notified appellants that their brief had not been filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellants or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response reasonably explaining the failure to file a brief and the 1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. need for an extension. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1). We have not received any response. Because appellants’ brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f). Appellants shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue. PER CURIAM PANEL: MCCOY, MEIER, and GABRIEL, JJ. DELIVERED: February 16, 2012 2