Robert David Jackson v. Jessica Lea Gray ( 2010 )

                                                            NO. 07-10-0038-CV

                                                   IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

                                       FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                                                 AT AMARILLO

                                                                     PANEL D

                                                                APRIL 12, 2010

                                            ______________________________

                                                    ROBERT DAVID JACKSON,

Appellant

                                                                            V.

JESSICA LEA GRAY,

Appellee

______________________________

                     FROM THE 46th DISTRICT COURT OF WILBARGER COUNTY;

                                  NO. 25,112; HON. DAN MIKE BIRD, PRESIDING

                                            ______________________________

                                                      MEMORANDUM OPINION

                                            ______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ.

Robert David Jackson perfected this appeal on January 25, 2010.  The appellate record was due on or about March 12, 2010.  Both the district clerk and court reporter have filed motions to extend the time to file their records because appellant apparently failed to pay or make arrangements to pay for them, as required by Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 35.3(a)(1)(2) and 35.3(b)(3).  By letter dated March 29, 2010, we directed appellant to certify to this court, by April 8, 2010, that he had complied with rule of procedure 35.3(a)(1)(2) and 35.3(b)(3).  So too was he informed that failure to meet that deadline would result in the dismissal of his appeal.  To date, this court has not received either the clerk=s record, the reporter=s record, or notification that the records have been paid for or that arrangements have been made for payment.  Nor has this court received any request to postpone the dismissal date. Consequently, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. 

Per Curiam