Alex Adriano Regis v. State ( 2013 )


Menu:
  • Opinion issued June 18, 2013
    In The
    Court of Appeals
    For The
    First District of Texas
    NO. 01-13-00392-CR
    ____________
    ALEX ADRIANO REGIS, Appellant
    V.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
    On Appeal from the 180th District Court
    Harris County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause No. 1367096
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Appellant Alex Adriano Regis pleaded guilty to the felony offense of failure
    to comply with sex offender registration requirements.       The trial court found
    appellant guilty, and in accordance with the terms of appellant’s plea agreement
    with the State, sentenced appellant to confinement for two years in the Institutional
    Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Appellant has filed a pro se
    notice of appeal. We dismiss the appeal.
    In a plea-bargain case, a defendant may only appeal those matters that were
    raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial or after getting the trial
    court’s permission to appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). An appeal must be
    dismissed if a certification showing that the defendant has the right of appeal has
    not been made part of the record. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).
    Here, the trial court’s certification is included in the record on appeal. See 
    id. The trial
    court’s certification states that this is a plea-bargain case and that the
    appellant has no right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). The record
    supports the trial court’s certification. See Dears v. State, 
    154 S.W.3d 610
    , 615
    (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Because appellant has no right of appeal, we must dismiss
    this appeal. See Chavez v. State, 
    183 S.W.3d 675
    , 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (“A
    court of appeals, while having jurisdiction to ascertain whether an appellant who
    plea-bargained is permitted to appeal by Rule 25.2(a)(2), must dismiss a prohibited
    appeal without further action, regardless of the basis for the appeal.”).
    2
    Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. We dismiss all
    pending motions as moot.
    PER CURIAM
    Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Higley, and Bland.
    Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 01-13-00392-CR

Filed Date: 6/18/2013

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015