Glen Gilmore v. Aldine Independent School District ( 2013 )


Menu:
  • Opinion issued June 11, 2013
    In The
    Court of Appeals
    For The
    First District of Texas
    NO. 01-12-01179-CV
    ____________
    GLEN GILMORE, Appellant
    V.
    ALDINE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, Appellee
    On Appeal from the 151st District Court
    Harris County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause No. 2011-52866
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Appellant Glen Gilmore, defendant-intervenor in the underlying trial court
    cause, filed a notice of appeal to the 151st District Court of Harris County from an
    order signed in the tax court, but the appeal was instead assigned to this Court.
    Appellant has filed a “Motion to Remand to Trial Court for Lack of Final
    Appealable Order” because there is no final judgment disposing of appellant’s
    claims in the court below. The record that was filed in this appeal shows that the
    plaintiff, Aldine Independent School District, along with various intervening taxing
    units, filed a non-suit. However, the record does not contain a signed order granting
    the non-suit, nor does it contain any order finally disposing of the appellant’s claims
    in intervention.
    Generally, appeals may be taken only from final judgments. Lehmann v.
    Har-Con Corp., 
    39 S.W.3d 191
    , 195 (Tex. 2001). We have no jurisdiction to hear
    an appeal from a judgment that is not final, unless there is specific statutory
    authority permitting an appeal before final judgment. See Stary v. DeBord, 
    967 S.W.2d 352
    , 352–53 (Tex. 1998); Iacono v. Lyons, 
    6 S.W.3d 715
    , 716–17 (Tex.
    App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, no pet.). Here, the record reflects that no final
    judgment has been entered by the trial court in this case.
    On May 17, 2013, the Court notified the parties of its intent to dismiss the
    appeal for want of jurisdiction unless appellant filed a response demonstrating this
    court’s jurisdiction on or before May 28, 2013. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a).
    Appellant has not filed a response.
    Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R.
    APP. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).
    2
    We dismiss all pending motions as moot.
    PER CURIAM
    Panel consists of Justice Keyes, Higley, and Bland.
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 01-12-01179-CV

Filed Date: 6/11/2013

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015