in Re: L. Wayne Tucker, Elizabeth George and the F&M Bank and Trust ( 2012 )

Writ of Mandamus 1)enied. Opinion issued December 10, 21)12
In The
rnitrt rif i\ppra1
Fift1! 3itrirt nf LrxLu tt Ja11n
No. 05-12-01419-CV
IN RE L. WAYNE TUCKER, ELIZABETH GEORGE, AND
THE F & M BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, Relators
Original Proceeding from the 162nd Judicial District Court
I)allas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. I)C—12-06-036
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Betbre Justices Moseley, FitzGerald, and Myers
Opinion by Justice Moseley
Relators contend the trial judge erred in authorizing depositions to he taken under Rule 202
of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we
need not recount them herein. Based on the record before us, we conclude relators have not shown
they are entitled to the relief requested. See TEx. R. A1p. P. 52.8(a): Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d
833, 839-40 (Tex. 1992) (orig, proceeding). Accordingly, we DENY relators’ petition for writ of
mandamus.
/
/
/
/ I /1
/
/JIMMOSELBY /
/ JUSTICE
121419F.P05