in Re: Anthony Peace ( 2012 )

rit of Mandamus 1)enicd, Opinion issued November 8, 2012
In The
Jnitrt rif Apprat
Fifti! Oitrirt uf jq at Jattai
No. 05-12-01454-CV
IN RE ANThONY PEACE, Relator
Original Proceeding from the 195th Judicial l)istrict Court
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause Iso. Fl 04 2535-Y
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Moseley, FitzGerald, and Myers
Opinion by Justice Moseley
Relator contends the trial court violated a ministerial duty by not ruling on his motion for
judgment nunc pro tune. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount
them herein. Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown he is entitled to the
relief requested. See Thx. R. App. P. 52.8(a); Simon v. Levario, 306 S.W.3d 318, 320-21 (Tex.
Crim. App. 2009) (orig. proceeding); State of Tex. cx ref. Hill v. Court ofAppealsfr the Fifth Dist.,
34 S.W.3d 924, 927 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001) (orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we DENY relator’s
petition for writ of mandamus.
JIM 4OELEY
121454FP05 JUW11CE