in Re: Holland, Rickey L., and Karen ( 2012 )

Writ of Mandamus Denied, Opinion issued September 28, 2012
E o
In The
nnrt uf ppiah
FiftI! Ditrtrt uf icxa at Ja1Ias
No. 05-12-01 185-CV
IN RE RICKEY L. HOLLAND AND KAREN HOLLAND, Relators
Original Proceeding from the 44th Judicial District Court
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. DC-09-15867-B
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Bridges, Lang, and Fillmore
Opinion by Justice Bridges
Relators contend the trial court erred in denying their motion to recuse. The facts and issues
are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. Based on the record before us,
we conclude relators have not shown they are entitled to the relief requested. See TEx. R. App.
52.8(a); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). Accordingly,
we DENY relators’ petition for writ of mandamus and emergency motion for temporary relief.
DAVID L. BRflS
JUSTICE
121 185F.P05