ebambi-mulenda-v-wilmington-savings-fund-society-fsb-succesor-by-merger ( 2011 )

02-11-403-CV

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02-11-00403-CV

EBAMBI MULENDA

APPELLANT

V.

WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB (SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO CHRISTIANA BANK & TRUST COMPANY), AS OWNER TRUSTEE OF THE SECURITY NATIONAL FUNDING TRUST

APPELLEE

------------

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION[1]

------------

          On September 30, 2011, Appellant Ebambi Mulenda filed a notice of appeal from the county court at law’s August 30, 2011 final judgment.

          On October 7, 2011, we notified appellant of our concern that we lacked jurisdiction over the appeal because it did not appear that the notice of appeal had been timely filed.  See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1.  That is, because no post-judgment motion was filed to extend the appellate deadline, appellant’s notice of appeal was due on September 29, 2011.  We informed appellant that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of jurisdiction unless, by October 17, 2011, appellant or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed with the court a response showing a reasonable explanation for the late filing of the notice of appeal or showing that the notice of appeal was timely filed per the “mailbox” rule.  See Tex. R. App. P. 9.2(b), 10.5(b), 26.3(b), 42.3(a); Hone v. Hanafin, 104 S.W.3d 884, 886 (Tex. 2003).  Having received no response, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).

                                                                             PER CURIAM

PANEL:  MCCOY, MEIER, and GABRIEL, JJ.

DELIVERED:  November 10, 2011

---

[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.