Ron St. John, Senovio Ramirez and Bravo Steel Products, Inc. v. Abraham Baksht ( 2010 )


Menu:
  •   

     

     

     

     

     

     

                                           NUMBER 13-09-00454-CV

     

                                     COURT OF APPEALS

     

                         THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

     

                             CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

    ____________________________________________________________

     

    RON ST. JOHN, SENOVIO RAMIREZ AND

    BRAVO STEEL PRODUCTS, INC.,                                          Appellants,

     

                                                                 v.

     

    ABRAHAM BAKSHT,                                                                     Appellee.

    ____________________________________________________________

     

                               On appeal from the 370th District Court

                                           of Hidalgo County, Texas.

    ____________________________________________________________

     

                                   MEMORANDUM OPINION

     

                         Before Justices Yañez, Garza, and Benavides

    Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

     


    Appellants, Ron St. John, Senovio Ramirez, and Bravo Steel Products, Inc., perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 370th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number C-4725-99-G.  Appellants have filed a motion for voluntary dismissal of their appeal on grounds that appellants no longer desire to pursue their appeal.  Appellants request that this Court dismiss the appeal.

    The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellants= motion for voluntary dismissal of their appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a).  Appellants= motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.  Costs will be taxed against appellants.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.").  Having dismissed the appeal at appellants= request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.  Any pending motions are dismissed as moot.

    PER CURIAM

    Delivered and filed the

    7th day of October, 2010.

     

     

     

     

     

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-09-00454-CV

Filed Date: 10/7/2010

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015