carlos-pasol-levitas-as-the-administrator-of-the-estate-of-alicia-p ( 2010 )


Menu:
  •   

     

     

     

     

     

     

                                           NUMBER 13-10-00424-CV

     

                                     COURT OF APPEALS

     

                         THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

     

                             CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

    ____________________________________________________________

     

    CARLOS PASOL LEVITAS, AS THE ADMINISTRATOR

    OF THE ESTATE OF ALICIA P. LEVITAS, DECEASED,

    AND AS THE ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE

    OF SARA PASOL FACTOR, DECEASED,                                Appellant,

     

                                                                 v.

     

    PEDRO L. BARRAZA, MARIA ELENA BARRAZA,

    AND BARRAZA FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,               Appellees.

    ____________________________________________________________

     

                               On appeal from the 357th District Court

                                          of Cameron County, Texas.

    ____________________________________________________________

     

                                   MEMORANDUM OPINION

     

                         Before Justices Yañez, Garza, and Benavides

    Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

     


    Appellant perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 357th District Court of Cameron County, Texas, in cause number 2001-10-4369-E.  Appellant has filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds that appellant no longer desires to prosecute this appeal.  Appellant requests that this Court dismiss the appeal.

    The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant=s unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a).  Appellant=s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.  Costs will be taxed against appellant.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.").  Having dismissed the appeal at appellant=s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

     

    PER CURIAM

    Delivered and filed the

    21st day of October, 2010.

     

     

     

     

     

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-10-00424-CV

Filed Date: 10/21/2010

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/1/2016