Fred D. Hall v. State ( 2012 )


Menu:
  •                                Fourth Court of Appeals
    San Antonio, Texas
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    No. 04-12-00141-CR
    Fred D. HALL,
    Appellant
    v.
    The STATE of Texas,
    Appellee
    From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
    Trial Court No. 2011-CR-0678
    Honorable Maria Teresa Herr, Judge Presiding
    Opinion by:       Steven C. Hilbig, Justice
    Sitting:          Karen Angelini, Justice
    Steven C. Hilbig, Justice
    Marialyn Barnard, Justice
    Delivered and Filed: December 12, 2012
    MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED; AFFIRMED
    Fred D. Hall was convicted by a jury of assault on a public servant and sentenced by the
    trial court to five years in prison and a $2,000.00 fine. The trial court suspended the sentence of
    confinement and placed Hall on community supervision for a period of five years. Hall appeals
    the judgment.
    Hall’s court-appointed appellate attorney filed a motion to withdraw and a brief in which
    she concludes this appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of
    Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
    (1967), High v. State, 
    573 S.W.2d 807
    (Tex. Crim. App.
    04-12-00141-CR
    1978), and Gainous v. State, 
    436 S.W.2d 137
    (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). Hall was provided copies
    of the brief and motion to withdraw and was informed of his right to review the record and file
    his own brief. Hall has not filed a pro se brief.
    After reviewing the record and counsel’s brief, we find no reversible error and agree with
    counsel the appeal is wholly frivolous. See Bledsoe v. State, 
    178 S.W.3d 824
    , 826-27 (Tex. Crim.
    App. 2005). We therefore grant the motion to withdraw filed by Hall’s and affirm the trial
    court’s judgment. See id.; Nichols v. State, 
    954 S.W.2d 83
    , 86 (Tex. App.–San Antonio 1997, no
    pet.); Bruns v. State, 
    924 S.W.2d 176
    , 177 n.1 (Tex. App.–San Antonio 1996, no pet.).
    No substitute counsel will be appointed. Should Hall wish to seek further review of this
    case by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, he must either retain an attorney to file a petition
    for discretionary review or file a pro se petition for discretionary review. Any petition for
    discretionary review must be filed within thirty days after either this opinion is rendered or the
    last timely motion for rehearing or motion for en banc reconsideration is overruled by this court.
    See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.2. Any petition for discretionary review must be filed with the clerk of the
    Court of Criminal Appeals. See 
    id. R. 68.3.
    Any petition for discretionary review must comply
    with the requirements of rule 68.4 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See 
    id. R. 68.4.
    Steven C. Hilbig, Justice
    DO NOT PUBLISH
    -2-