Cheryl Stevenson v. State ( 2012 )


Menu:
  •                                 MEMORANDUM OPINION
    No. 04-12-00439-CR
    Cheryl STEVENSON,
    Appellant
    v.
    The STATE of Texas,
    Appellee
    From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
    Trial Court No. 2011CR7803
    Honorable Maria Teresa Herr, Judge Presiding
    PER CURIAM
    Sitting:          Rebecca Simmons, Justice
    Steven C. Hilbig, Justice
    Marialyn Barnard, Justice
    Delivered and Filed: September 26, 2012
    DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION
    Appellant Cheryl Stevenson waived a jury trial and pleaded guilty to harassment of a
    public servant.      The trial court imposed sentence on November 15, 2011, but suspended
    confinement and placed appellant on community supervision. Thereafter, the State alleged that
    appellant violated the terms of her plea and moved to revoke appellant’s community supervision.
    Just before the hearing on the motion to revoke, appellant’s counsel filed a Motion Suggesting
    Incompetency and Request for Examination.             The court granted the motion suggesting
    04-12-00439-CR
    incompetency; it did not consider the motion to revoke. Appellant filed a notice of appeal
    complaining of the order granting an examination.
    An appellant may appeal “a pretrial hearing on competency when such matter is raised in
    an appeal from the trial on its merits,” but not before. See Jackson v. State, 
    548 S.W.2d 685
    , 690
    (Tex. Crim. App. 1977); Petty v. State, 05-04-00705-CR, 
    2004 WL 1302951
    , at *1 (Tex. App.—
    Dallas June 14, 2004, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication).
    On August 15, 2012, we ordered appellant to show cause in writing not later than August
    30, 2012, why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. On September 10,
    2012, appellant’s counsel filed a motion for extension of time to file a response to our August 15,
    2012 order, and a response stating counsel’s opinion that this court does not have jurisdiction to
    hear appellant’s appeal. Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file the response is granted.
    We conclude that this court is without jurisdiction to consider appellant’s complaint. See
    TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 42.12 § 23(b); 
    Jackson, 548 S.W.2d at 690
    . Therefore, we
    dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.
    PER CURIAM
    DO NOT PUBLISH
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-12-00439-CR

Filed Date: 9/26/2012

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015