in Re: Jesse (Jesus) Soliz ( 2010 )


Menu:
  •                                     NUMBER 13-10-00078-CR
    COURT OF APPEALS
    THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
    IN RE JESSE (JESUS) SOLIZ
    On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Benavides
    Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion1
    Relator, Jesse (Jesus) Soliz, pro se, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the
    above cause on February 19, 2010, through which he seeks (1) to compel the trial court
    to set aside its order denying relator’s motion for nunc pro tunc judgment; and (2) to
    1
    See T EX . R . A PP . P . 5 2 .8 (d ) (“W hen denying relief, the court m ay hand dow n an opinio n but
    is not required to do so.”); T EX . R . A PP . P . 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and m em orandum opinions).
    compel the trial court to conduct a hearing on relator’s motion for nunc pro tunc judgment
    and to permit relator’s appearance at that hearing.2
    The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus,
    is of the opinion that relator has not shown himself entitled to the relief sought.
    Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX . R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
    PER CURIAM
    Do not publish. See TEX . R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
    Delivered and filed the 24th
    day of February, 2010.
    2
    Relator contends, generally, that the sentences im posed by his judgm ents in three causes should
    run concurrently rather than consecutively. These three causes have been previously presented to this Court.
    See generally Soliz v. State, No. 13-03-00473-CR, 2003 Tex. App. LEXIS 7383 (Tex. App.–Corpus Christi
    Aug. 28, 2003, no pet.) (per curiam ) (m em . op. not designated for publication) (dism issing an appeal by
    request of appellant); Soliz v. State, No. 13-01-00540-CR, 2002 Tex. App. LEXIS 2456 (Tex. App.–Corpus
    Christi Apr. 4, 2002, no pet.) (per curiam ) (m em . op. not designated for publication) (dism issing an attem pted
    appeal from an order denying an application for writ of habeas corpus); Soliz v. State, 785 S.W .2d 438 (Tex.
    App.–Corpus Christi 1990, no pet.) (affirm ing a conviction for felony burglary of a habitation).
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-10-00078-CR

Filed Date: 2/24/2010

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015