Torrance Jawan Johnson v. State ( 2011 )


Menu:
  •                                 MEMORANDUM OPINION
    No. 04-11-00102-CR
    Torrance Jawan JOHNSON,
    Appellant
    v.
    The STATE of Texas,
    Appellee
    From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
    Trial Court No. 2007CR5641A
    Honorable Maria Teresa Herr, Judge Presiding
    Opinion by:       Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
    Sitting:          Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
    Phylis Speedlin, Justice
    Marialyn Barnard, Justice
    Delivered and Filed: November 2, 2011
    AFFIRMED; MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED
    Defendant’s court-appointed appellate attorney filed a brief containing a professional
    evaluation of the record and demonstrating that there are no arguable grounds to be advanced.
    Counsel concludes that the appeal is without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders
    v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
    (1967). Defendant was informed of his right to review the record.
    Counsel provided defendant with a copy of the brief and advised him of his right to file a pro se
    brief. Defendant has not filed a pro se brief.
    04-11-00102-CR
    After reviewing the record and counsel’s brief, we agree the appeal is frivolous and
    without merit. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s judgment, and we GRANT appellate
    counsel’s motion to withdraw. 1 Nichols v. State, 
    954 S.W.2d 83
    , 86 (Tex. App.—San Antonio
    1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State, 
    924 S.W.2d 176
    , 177 n.1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1996, no pet.).
    Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
    Do not publish
    1
    No substitute counsel will be appointed. See In re Schulman, 
    252 S.W.3d 403
    , 408 n.22 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008).
    Should defendant wish to seek further review of this case by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, defendant must
    either retain an attorney to file a petition for discretionary review or file a pro se petition for discretionary review.
    Any petition for discretionary review must be filed within thirty days from the date of either this opinion or the last
    timely motion for rehearing that is overruled by this court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.2. Any petition for discretionary
    review must be filed with this court, after which it will be forwarded to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals along
    with the rest of the filings in this case. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.3. Any petition for discretionary review must comply
    with the requirements of Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 68.4.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-11-00102-CR

Filed Date: 11/2/2011

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015