-
Opinion issued September 15, 2011.
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
————————————
NO. 01-11-00694-CV
———————————
IN RE LEON SHANKLE AND MARGIE BENTON SHANKLE, Relators
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION
By petition for writ of mandamus, relators, Leon Shankle and Margie Benton Shankle, challenge the trial court’s judgment granting the real parties in interest, Joseph Ouzenne and Ouzenne Construction Company, their bill of review, setting aside the underlying default judgment, and reinstating the case.[1]
We deny the petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Bland and Huddle.
[1] The underlying case is Leon Shankle and Margie Benton Shankle v. Paul Ouzenne, Individually, and Ouzenne Construction Company, No. 2003-13270, in the 129th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Michael Gomez presiding.
Document Info
Docket Number: 01-11-00694-CV
Filed Date: 9/15/2011
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/16/2015