in Re Leon Shankle and Margie Benton Shankle ( 2011 )


Menu:
  • Opinion issued September 15, 2011.

      

    In The

    Court of Appeals

    For The

    First District of Texas

    ————————————

    NO. 01-11-00694-CV

    ———————————

    IN RE LEON SHANKLE AND MARGIE BENTON SHANKLE, Relators

     

     

    Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

     

     

    MEMORANDUM OPINION

              By petition for writ of mandamus, relators, Leon Shankle and Margie Benton Shankle, challenge the trial court’s judgment granting the real parties in interest, Joseph Ouzenne and Ouzenne Construction Company, their bill of review, setting aside the underlying default judgment, and reinstating the case.[1] 

              We deny the petition for writ of mandamus.

    PER CURIAM

     

    Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Bland and Huddle.

     



    [1]           The underlying case is Leon Shankle and Margie Benton Shankle v. Paul Ouzenne, Individually, and Ouzenne Construction Company, No. 2003-13270, in the 129th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Michael Gomez presiding.

Document Info

Docket Number: 01-11-00694-CV

Filed Date: 9/15/2011

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015