Betzler Investments, Inc. v. Lindstrom Cleaning and Construction, Inc. ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                                                                                                                ACCEPTED
    14-15-00998-cv
    FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS
    HOUSTON, TEXAS
    12/15/2015 11:43:38 AM
    CHRISTOPHER PRINE
    CLERK
    x
    FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS                      FILED IN
    14th COURT OF APPEALS
    CIVL APPEAL MEDIATION DOCKETING STATEMENT
    HOUSTON, TEXAS
    RETURN WITHIN 15 DAYS TO:   12/15/2015 11:43:38 AM
    CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
    CLERK, FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS;       Clerk
    301 FANNIN, ROOM 245; HOUSTON, TEXAS 77002
    tr**For Civil Appeals,see Section V for information about the Pro Bono Program sponsored and administered by
    ,   the Pro Bono Committees of the Appellate Practice Sections of the State Bar of Texas.and the Houston Bar
    Association.
    I.        General Information:
    Appellant(s):                                           Appellate Cause No
    Betzler Investments, LLC                                14-15-00998-CV
    Appellee(s):                                            Trial Ct. Cause No.:
    Lindstrom Cleaning & Construction,                      10-cv-0990-A
    Inc.
    County:
    Quality Trusted Commercial
    Construction & Roofing, Inc.                            Galveston
    Other                                                   Trial Court:
    l22nd Judicial District Court
    II.       Timetable:
    Appeal stayed by bankruptcy. Date bankruptcy                       filed:   No
    List:     name of bankruptcy court:
    bankruptcy case number:
    style of bankruptcy filing:
    082995\004\42   77   623 .v   1
    UI.        Jurisdiction:
    V/ill you challenge this
    court's jurisdiction?               Noø                  Yes tr
    IV.        Indigency Of Party (TRAP 32.1(k)): (Attach file-stamped copy of
    affidavit)
    Filed
    Event                                   Date            N/A
    Check as appropriate
    Affidavit filed                      Noø         Yes !
    Contest filed                        No          Yes ¡
    Date ruling on contest due:
    Ruling on contest:
    Sustained !
    Overruled E
    V.         Pro Bono Pilot Program:
    The Pro Bono Committees of the Appellate Practice Sections of the State Bar of
    Texas and the Houston Bar Association are participating in a Pro Bono Program to
    place a limited number of civil appeals with appellate counsel who will represent the
    appellant/appellee in the appeal before the Fourteenth Court of Appeals.
    The Pro Bono Committee is solely responsible for screening and selecting the civil
    cases for inclusion in the Pilot Program based upon a number of discretionary criteria,
    including the financial means of the appellee. If a case is selected by the Committee,
    and can be matched with appellate counsel, that counsel will take over representation
    of the appellee without charging legal fees. More information regarding this program
    can be found in the Pro Bono Pilot Program Pamphlet available in paper form at the
    Clerk's Office or on the Internet at                  http://www.tex-app.org and
    http://www.hba.org/folder-sections/sec-appellate.htm. If your case is selected and
    matched with a volunteer lawyer, you will receive a letter from the Pro Bono Pilot
    Committee within thirty (30) to forty-five (45) days after submitting this Docketing
    08 29   95\004\4   277   623.v t
    Statement.
    NOTE: There is no guarantee that, if you submit your case for possible inclusion
    in the Pro Bono Program, the Pro Bono Committee will select your case and that
    pro bono counsel can be found to represent you. Accordingly, you should not
    forego seeking other counsel to represent you in this proceeding. By signing your
    name below, you are authorizing the Pro Bono Committee to transmit publicly
    available facts and information about your case, including parties and
    background, through selected Internet sites and a Listserv to its pool of volunteer
    appellate attorneys.
    1.         Do you want this case to be considered for inclusion in the Pro Bono Pilot
    Program?
    Yesn                 Noø
    If you answered "Yes" to Question V.1, then please answer the following questions
    2.    Do you authorize the Pro Bono Committee to contact your trial counsel of
    record in this matter to answer questions the committee may have regarding the
    appeal? Please note that any such conversations would be maintained as confidential
    by the Pro Bono Committee and the information used solely for the purposes of
    considering the case for inclusion in the Pro Bono Program.
    Yes tr               Non
    3. If you have not previously filed an affidavit of indigency and attached a file-
    stamped copy of that affidavit, does your income exceed 200% of the U.S.
    Department of Health and Human Services Federal Poverty Guidelines? These
    guidelines can be found in the Pro Bono Program Pamphlet as well as on the Internet
    at                                                     .shtml
    Yes                   No
    4.   Are you willing to disclose your financial circumstances to the Pro Bono
    Committee? If so, please attach an Affidavit of Indigency completed and executed by
    the appellee. Forms may be found in the Clerk's Office or on the Internet at
    http://www.tex-app.org and http://www.hba.org/folder-sections/sec-appellate.htm.
    Your participation in the Pro Bono Pilot Program may be conditioned upon your
    execution of an aff,rdavit under oath as to your financial circumstances.
    Yes   tl              No
    5.          Give a brief descri                of the issues to be raised on   , the relief
    0 8   2995\004\42   77   623.v I
    and the applicable standard of review, if known (without prejudice to the right to raise
    additional issues or request additional relief; use a separate attachment, if necessary).
    Appellee does not seek review of the district court's rulings. To the best of
    Appellee's knowledge, Appellant will challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to
    support the jury's verdict.
    VI.      AlternativeDisputeResolution/Mediation (ifapplicable)
    Instructions: This information will be used in conjunction with the Rule 32.1
    docketing statement to evaluate your case for possible referral to an alternative dispute
    resolution procedure . See Tnx. R. App. P. 32.1. The court will not consider your
    answers if the case is submitted on the merits. Each party (except where noted) must
    complete and file a completed docketing form in the Court of Appeals after the appeal
    is perfected.
    Check Y for yes or N for no. Fill in all blanks or check appropriate boxes.
    1.     Should this case be referred to mediation?   Yes   ¡   No   EI (use additional
    sheets if necessary)
    If no, why?
    This case was mediated prior to trial. During that mediation, Appellant failed to
    make a legitimate settlement offer. After the entry of judgment against
    Appellant, Appellant indicated it would make a settlement offer to allow
    assessment of whether mediation might be productive, but Appellant has failed
    to do so. Appellee's judgment totals nearly $5 million, but Appellant has posted
    a supersedeas bond totaling only $441,955. Appellee believes that mediation
    would only delay and jeopardize Appellant's ability to recover on its judgment.
    (The court makes the final decision regarding referral of a case to mediation)
    2.        Has this case been through an ADR procedure in the trial court?   Yes   ø     No
    tr
    If you answered                   yes:
    a.        V/ho was the mediator? Nancy Houston
    b.        What type of ADR procedure? Mediation
    c.        At what stage did the case go through ADR?
    08 2 9 95\004\42 7'7   623.v I
    Øpre-trial                    trial    post-trial   other
    3.   Rate the case for complexity. Use 1 for the least complex and 5 for the most
    complex. Check one:
    tø2 E314 trs fl
    The issues on appeal are not complex.
    VII.       Signature:
    Date: December 15,20t5
    Signature of counsel                                    State Bar   No.:   24065578
    Printed Name: Amanda Kurz Smith
    Address                     Galloway, Johnson, Tompkins, Burr & Smith
    1301 McKinney Street, Suite 1400
    Houston, Texas 770I0
    Email Address                 : asmith@gallowayj ohnson.com
    Telephone            Number: (713) 599-0700
    Facsimile Number: (713) 599-0777
    Representing: Appellee Lindstrom Cleaning & Construction, Inc.
    08 299   5\004\42   7 7   623.v   I
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-15-00998-CV

Filed Date: 12/15/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/30/2016