Felipe Negrete v. the State of Texas ( 2021 )


Menu:
  •                                                                                          FILE COPY
    Fourth Court of Appeals
    San Antonio, Texas
    October 5, 2021
    No. 04-20-00212-CR
    Felipe NEGRETE,
    Appellant
    v.
    The STATE of Texas,
    Appellee
    From the 38th Judicial District Court, Uvalde County, Texas
    Trial Court No. 2018-05-13279-CR
    Honorable Camile Glasscock Dubose, Judge Presiding
    ORDER
    Sitting:       Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice
    Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
    Beth Watkins, Justice
    This court’s opinion and judgment in this appeal issued on July 28, 2021. Appellant did
    not file a motion for rehearing or a motion for en banc reconsideration. Therefore, the deadline
    for appellant to file a petition for discretionary review with the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    was August 27, 2021. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.2. The deadline for appellant to file a motion to
    extend the time to file a petition for discretionary review with the Court of Criminal Appeals was
    September 13, 2021. See id. R. 4.1, 68.2.
    Rule 48.4 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure requires an attorney representing a
    criminal defendant on appeal to send his client, within five days after the opinion is handed
    down, a copy of the opinion and judgment, along with notification of the defendant’s right to file
    a pro se petition for discretionary review with the Court of Criminal Appeals. See id. R. 48.4. In
    this case, the deadline for appellant’s attorney to comply with Rule 48.4 was August 2, 2021.
    Under Rule 48.4, an attorney is also required to send this court a letter certifying compliance
    with Rule 48.4 within the time for filing a motion for rehearing. See id. The deadline for filing a
    motion for rehearing, unless extended, is 15 days after judgment is rendered. See id. R. 49.1.
    Here, the deadline for appellant’s attorney to file his letter certifying compliance was August 12,
    2021. See id. On August 25, 2021, we sent appellant’s attorney a letter apprising him of his
    failure to file his compliance letter and requesting that he send his compliance letter to the court
    within 10 days.
    FILE COPY
    On September 22, 2021, appellant filed an “Unopposed Motion to Extend Time for
    Extension of Time to Respond and Comply with the Order of the Court of August 25, 2021.” In
    his motion, appellant’s counsel asks for an extension of time, pursuant to Rule 4.5, to comply
    with Rule 48.4. Rule 4.5 provides for a procedure to gain additional time to file a motion for
    rehearing and, consequently, to send the Rule 48.4 compliance letter. See id. R. 4.5(a), 48.4.
    However, Rule 4.5 applies only if a party did not timely receive notice of the judgment or order
    rendered. See id. R. 4.5(a). Here, the motion states: “Petitioner received notice of the entry of
    the JUDGMENT of the court of appeals on July 28, 2021.”
    Under these circumstances, it appears that counsel’s delay in complying with Rule 48.4
    has prejudiced appellant because the time for appellant to file a petition for discretionary review
    with the Court of Criminal Appeals and the time to file a motion to extend this deadline have
    expired. See id. R. 48.4, 68.2. Therefore, we DENY appellant’s motion, and ORDER
    appellant’s counsel to send appellant, by October 11, 2021, a copy of this order, our opinion,
    and our judgment, along with instructions on how appellant may file a writ of habeas corpus
    seeking an out-of-time appeal. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07; Ater v. Eighth Court of
    Appeals, 
    802 S.W.2d 241
    , 243 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (explaining that writ of habeas corpus
    pursuant to article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure governs out-of-time appeals
    from felony convictions); see also Ex parte Riley, 
    193 S.W.3d 900
    , 902 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006)
    (“Applicant is entitled to file an out-of-time petition for discretionary review on the basis that he
    was deprived of his statutory right to file a petition for discretionary review by his attorney’s
    failure to notify him when the court of appeals affirmed his conviction.”). Appellant’s counsel
    shall send these copies and instructions by certified mail, return receipt requested, to appellant at
    his last known address. Further, we ORDER appellant’s counsel to send this court a letter
    certifying his compliance with this order and attaching a copy of the return receipt by October
    21, 2021.
    _________________________________
    Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice
    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
    court on this 5th day of October, 2021.
    ___________________________________
    MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-20-00212-CR

Filed Date: 10/5/2021

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/12/2021