Tyrone Radale Shepard v. State ( 2018 )


Menu:
  •                                   IN THE
    TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
    No. 10-18-00101-CR
    TYRONE RADALE SHEPARD,
    Appellant
    v.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS,
    Appellee
    From the 272nd District Court
    Brazos County, Texas
    Trial Court No. 17-04108-CRF-272
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Tyrone Shepard has filed a pro se “Notice of Appeal.” Citing article 44.02 of the
    Code of Criminal Procedure, Shepard appeals what he describes as “a matter which has
    been raised by written motion filed prior to tried [sic].” See generally TEX. CODE CRIM.
    PROC. ANN. art. 44.02 (West 2006). Shepard states that whenever a request for a court
    reporter is made, the refusal to furnish the court reporter and require a transcription of
    the proceedings is per se prejudicial. Shepard prays that this Court order the court
    reporter and court coordinator of the trial court to “provide all testimony and evidence
    adduced in shorthand or by any method to record all proceedings held in this cause.”
    The right of appeal in criminal cases is conferred by the Legislature, and a
    defendant may appeal only from judgments of conviction or interlocutory orders
    authorized as appealable. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 44.02; TEX. R. APP. P.
    25.2(a)(2); see also Ragston v. State, 
    424 S.W.3d 49
    , 52 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (“‘[T]he
    standard for determining jurisdiction is not whether the appeal is precluded by law, but
    whether the appeal is authorized by law.’” (quoting Abbott v. State, 
    271 S.W.3d 694
    , 696-
    97 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008))). Shepard is not appealing from a judgment of conviction or
    an appealable interlocutory order; therefore, we have no jurisdiction over his appeal.1 See
    
    Ragston, 424 S.W.3d at 52
    ; see also 
    Abbott, 271 S.W.3d at 696-97
    . Accordingly, this appeal
    is dismissed.
    REX D. DAVIS
    Justice
    Before Chief Justice Gray,
    Justice Davis, and
    Justice Scoggins
    Appeal dismissed
    Opinion delivered and filed March 28, 2018
    Do not publish
    [CR25]
    1And to the extent Shepard is seeking mandamus relief against the court reporter or court coordinator of
    the trial court, we have no jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus against a court reporter or court
    coordinator unless such is necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221 (West
    Supp. 2017); In re Strickhausen, 
    994 S.W.2d 936
    , 936 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, orig. proceeding).
    Shepard v. State                                                                                     Page 2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 10-18-00101-CR

Filed Date: 3/28/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 3/30/2018