Tiffanny Jones, M.D. and TJONESIVFMD, PLLC v. Frisco Fertility Center, PLLC, D/B/A Dallas IVF ( 2021 )


Menu:
  • Order entered October 18, 2021
    In The
    Court of Appeals
    Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
    No. 05-21-00008-CV
    TIFFANNY JONES, M.D. AND TJONESIVFMD, PLLC, Appellant
    V.
    FRISCO FERTILITY CENTER, PLLC, D/B/A DALLAS IVF, Appellee
    On Appeal from the 471st Judicial District Court
    Collin County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause No. 471-02739-2020
    ORDER
    Before Justices Molberg, Nowell, and Goldstein
    Before the Court is Appellee’s Second Emergency Rule 29.3 Motion filed
    on September 22, 2021, Appellants’ Response filed on October 11, 2021, and
    Appellee’s Motion for Leave to File Reply in Support of Second Emergency Rule
    29.3 Motion filed on October 13, 2021.
    We GRANT appellee’s motion for leave to file a reply.
    While the trial court’s temporary injunction order set an October 18, 2021
    trial date, it also ordered that the temporary injunction “will continue in force until
    completion of final trial/hearing on the merits before the American Arbitration
    Association (‘AAA’) and the execution of a final judgment in this Cause at the
    conclusion of such arbitration, or until further order of this Court or the agreement
    of the parties.” Cf. Senter Investments, L.L.C. v. Veerjee, 
    358 S.W.3d 841
    , 845–46
    (Tex. App.—Dallas 2012, no pet.) (rejecting appellant’s argument that a temporary
    injunction order that did not include a trial date order was void because, after the
    trial court compelled arbitration, “[a]ny trial setting would be abated pending the
    resolution of the arbitration proceeding and would serve little purpose”).
    Accordingly, we DENY Appellee’s second rule 29.3 motion to the extent
    that it seeks to extend the temporary injunction order’s trial date. But we GRANT
    the motion for emergency relief to the extent of confirming that the trial court’s
    order remains in place and is not suspended during this appeal, or alternatively so
    order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 29.3 (“When an appeal from an interlocutory order is
    perfected, the appellate court may make any temporary orders necessary to
    preserve the parties’ rights until disposition of the appeal and may require
    appropriate security.”).
    /s/    KEN MOLBERG
    JUSTICE
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 05-21-00008-CV

Filed Date: 10/18/2021

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/20/2021