Marco Xavier Ramirez v. the State of Texas ( 2021 )


Menu:
  • Dismiss and Opinion Filed October 21, 2021
    In The
    Court of Appeals
    Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
    No. 05-21-00648-CR
    MARCO XAVIER RAMIREZ, Appellant
    V.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
    On Appeal from the 296th Judicial District Court
    Collin County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause No. 296-82985-2020
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Before Justices Molberg, Nowell, and Goldstein
    Opinion by Justice Nowell
    On July 20, 2021, Marco Xavier Ramirez filed a pro se notice of appeal,
    seeking to challenge his conviction for aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon.
    We dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.
    The clerk’s record shows that appellant, who was represented by counsel,
    entered into a negotiated plea bargain with the State. Under the terms, appellant
    agreed to plead guilty to aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon, a firearm, and
    true to the enhancement paragraph in exchange for the State’s agreement to
    recommend punishment at forty years. As further consideration for the plea bargain,
    appellant waived his right to appeal. See Blanco v. State, 
    18 S.W.3d 218
    , 219–20
    (Tex. Crim. App. 2000). The trial court accepted appellant’s guilty plea, found
    appellant guilty, and, following the plea agreement, assessed punishment, enhanced
    by a prior felony conviction, at forty years in prison. The trial court prepared and
    signed a rule 25.2(d) certification of the right to appeal stating this “is a plea-bargain
    case, and [appellant] has NO right to appeal” and appellant “has waived the right of
    appeal.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). In addition, the trial court noted in the
    judgment, “APPEAL WAIVED. NO PERMISSION TO APPEAL GRANTED.”
    The certification is supported by the documents before the Court. See Dears v. State,
    
    154 S.W.3d 610
    , 614–15 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Because appellant waived his
    right to appeal under the clear terms of the plea agreement, we conclude we lack
    jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a), (d); Lundgren v. State, 
    434 S.W.3d 594
    ,
    599 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (when appellant voluntarily waives right of appeal to
    secure benefits of plea bargain agreement, subsequent notice of appeal fails to
    “initiate the appellate process”).
    We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
    /Erin A. Nowell//
    210648f.u05                                  ERIN A. NOWELL
    Do Not Publish                               JUSTICE
    TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b)
    –2–
    Court of Appeals
    Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
    JUDGMENT
    MARCO XAVIER RAMIREZ,                        On Appeal from the 296th Judicial
    Appellant                                    District Court, Collin County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause No. 296-82985-
    No. 05-21-00648-CR          V.               2020.
    Opinion delivered by Justice Nowell.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee                 Justices Molberg and Goldstein
    participating.
    Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS this appeal.
    Judgment entered this 21st day of October, 2021.
    –3–
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 05-21-00648-CR

Filed Date: 10/21/2021

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/27/2021