Kyle Miller v. State ( 2015 )

OURTCF CtURr Cr v s i-"*1 Qr.fl nomberd causa oh o^tal &3nd 4Ve inlTaily as well as frp rulimA^er4Dnatprovide nuptial fvDM anyy 4v\a\ Tn 4 s tn vT& of . C\ . an -ftr an s. !\J. t. ! T-V i6 le ho L. LJ5l. . XrA T-V'5 er 4-he fefyiAvewerks c*£* Rule. 34. llorJ eeelfH rvu-4rial -tawmupk anJ rviDfeon hearings ovs VJu^fee, -ki pursue wvecril rgful and adiequfcle o.t-V' fi am d-VTnov crp rjoKce perhnx rirTWU 4Tl d hasn ordeved-to nrAec 4 irVve CcuHs 4\tq4 CR lqiU lecxc\ htA CO H-\i2 CcnWru 4o perjuru tt, "v pp p 5vfir\ci (WA^jpDr4€^4\ie4ranf£japfe(^ as ujeUa^-ih^ nar^Vr\al4Uci4erckdi as sudn " b l ^peUctk.TVocedure 'bo. ICOC6) ar\d cor\7lfye a4nie art! c£>ae