in Re: A Purported Lien or Claim Against Helvetia Asset Recovery, Inc. ( 2015 )

ACCEPTED
04-14-00357-CV
FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS
SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS
8/5/2015 9:42:20 PM
KEITH HOTTLE
CLERK
04 -14 -00357 CV
RECEIVED IN
4th COURT OF APPEALS
Jn 'ar:be QCourt 2009 WL 349813, at *5
(Tex. App.-Houston [1st Dist.] Feb. 12, 2009, no writ.) ......................................... 11
BMG Direct Mktg.,Inc.v. Peake,
178 S.W.3d 7763,767 (Texas 2005) ........................................................................ 21
Bland Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Blue,
34 S.W.3d 547, 553-54 (Tex.2000) ........................................................................ 24-
Buffalo Bag Co. v. Joachim,
704 S.W.2d 482, 483 (Tex App -Houston [I st Dist 11986,
writ refd nre.). ...................................................................................................................... 20
Burnaman v. Heaton ,
150 Tex. 333 (1951)240 S.W.2d288 ........ ............ .............. ........... ... ......... ............. 21
Cetti v. Dunman,
26 Tex. Civ. App. 433 [26 Tex. Civ. App. 433],
64 S.W. 787 (1901, writrefd). ........................................................................................ 22
City ofAllen v. Pub. Util. Comm 'n of Tex.,
161 S.W.3d 195, 199 (Tex.App.-Austin 2005, no pet.) ........................................ 24
City ofDeSoto v. White ,
288 S.W.3d 359, 393 (Tex. 2009) ......................................................................... 24
City ofHouston v. Rhule,
417 S.W.3d 440, 442 (Tex. 2013) (per curiam) ....... ......... ................... ......... ......... 23
City ofRoonoke v. T. of Westlake, I
11 S.W.3d 617 (Tex.App.-Ft. Worth 2003). ............................................................................ 21
CometAluminum Co v Dibrell,
450 S.W.2d 56, 58 (Tex 1970) (ong proceeding) ... ....................................................... 20
Conner v, Johnson,
02-03-31 6-cv (Tex App -Ft Worth 10-28-.2004) .................................................... 15
vu
Duncan v Smith,
393 s W 2d 798, 80304 (Tex. 1 965)) .................................................................................. 15
Dunlap v. Villnreal,
91 S.W.2d 1124, 1125 (Tex.Civ.App.-San Antonio 1936, no writ). .. ........................... 22
Early v. Bums,
142 S.W.2d 260 (Tex.Civ.App. - Beaumont 1940, writ refd) ...................................... 22
Entergy Corp. v. Jenkins,
01-12-00470-cv (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 11-6-2014)................................... 23
Ex Parte Preston,
833 8W.24 515 (Tex.Cr.App. I 992) ... . .. ..... ................................................... ....... 20
Failv. Lee,
535 S.W.2d 203, 207-08 (Tex. Civ.App. -Fort Worth 1976, no writ)" .......................... 22
Fin. Comm'n ofTex. v. Norwood,
418 S.W.3d 566, 578 (Tex. 2013) ...... . .. ...... ......... .............. ....................... .......... 23
First Coppell Bank v. Smith,
742 S.W.2d 454, 460 (Tex.App.-Dallas 1987, no writ) .......................................... 16
Fortune Prod. Co. v. Conoco, Inc.,
52 S.W.3d 671, 678 (Tex. 2000) ......................................................................... 16
Gomer v. Davis,
419 S.W.3d 470 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2013) .......................................... 11
Gym-N-I Playgrounds v. Snider,
220 S.W.3d 905 (Tex. 2007). ................................................................................. 21
In re Estate ofFlores,
76 S.W.3d 624, 630 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi 2002, no pet.) ................................ 16
In re United Servs. Auto. Ass'n,
307 S.W.3d 299, 309 (Tex. 2010). .......................................................................... 24
V111
In Re Guerrero,
440 S.W.3d 917 (Tex.App.-Amarillo-2014). ............................................ .. .................. 20
Johnson v. Rancho Guadalupe, inc.,
789 S.W.2d 596, 598 (Tex. App. -Texarkana 1990, writ denied). .................................. 22
Loejjler v. Lytle Indep. Sch. Dist.,
211 S.W.3d 331, 349-50 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 2006, pet. denied) .................... 12
Low v. Henry,
221 S.W.3d 609 (Tex, . 2007) ................................................................................. 11
McMillan v. McMillan,
72 S.W.2d 611 (Tex.Civ.App. - Dallas 1934, no writ). ............................. .................... 22
Nath V Texas Children's Hospital And Baylor College OfMedicine,
12-0620 (Tex. 8-29-2014) ....................................................................................... 10
Pierce v. Terra Mar Consultants, inc.,
566 S.W.2d 49 (Tex.Civ.App. - Texarkana 1978, writ dismd). ................................... 22
Sinochem Int'l Co. v. Malaysia Int'l Shipping Corp.,
549 U.S. 422, 431, 127 S. Ct. 1184, 1191 (2007)) ............ .............. ........ ...... ........... 23
Solano v. Landamerica Commw.,
02-07-152-cv (Tex.App. -Ft. Worth 12-4-2008) ...... .............. ......... .............. ........... 16
Swanberg v. Swanberg,
01-12-00375-cv (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 8-22-2013). .................................. 11
Travelers Companies. v. Wolfe
838 S.W.2d 708, 714 Tex.App.-Amarillo 1992,no writ ............................................... .15
Univ. of Tex. at Arlington v. Bishop,
997 S.W.2d 350, 357 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 1999, pet. denied) ........................... 12
Univ. of Tex. Sw. Med. Ctr. v. Loutzenhiser,
140 S.W.3d 351, 359 (Tex. 2004). .......................................................................... 24
Walden v Sanger,
lX
250 S.W.2d 312,; Tex.App.-Austin 1952, no writ. .................................................. 22
Will. v. Nolan,
58 Tex. 708, 713-14 (1883); ............................................................................................. 22.
STATUTES
TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE§ 10.001; .......................................... 10,.11, 24
Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann.§ 10.004(d) (Vernon 2002) ...... .......... 7, 11,24
Tex. Gov' t Code . § 51903 ............................................................................ 7,13,25
RULES
Tex. R. Civ. P. Rule 11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... 7,20,21.25
OTHER AUTHORITIES
25 *., p. 385, et seq.;... . .. .... . .... . .. ............ . .. ................... . .. . ..... 21.
49 C.J.S., Judgments, § 173, page 308, et seq. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... 21.
x
STATEMENT OF CASE
Nature the case this is an appeal arising out of the granting sanctions for a
fictitious filing and attempted withdrawal of a Rule 11 Agreement. 3CR 229.256.
Course ofproceeding. The On November 5, 2013 1 CRlHelvetia filed the
lawsuit giving rise to this appeal as an "action on fraudulent lien on property"
pursuant to section§ 51.903 of the Texas Government Code. Hon. Judge John
D. Gabriel signed in order stating that the deeds are fraudulent. 1 CR 76. On
December 11, 2013 Hon. Karen H Pozza signed an order setting aside
November 5, 2013:2 CR 11 On April 1, 2014, Judge Tanner signed a Final
Judgment and Order of Sanctions against Kahn and his attorney 3CR 229.
Judge Tanner denied Kahn's motion to reconsider, vacate, modify, correct or
reform the Sanctions Judgment on April 11, 2014. 4CR 23 9.
Disposition Of The Case, Kahn filed his notice of appeal on May 14,
2014. 4CR 243. On November 3, 2014 Appellee filed its Brief and Motion. This
reply is in response to that Brief and Motion.
Xl
STATEMENT REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT
Kahn does not believe that oral argument is necessary as the arguments
in brief hopefully will convince the Court to reverse the sanctions
STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION
Appellant appeals final judgment setting aside the 224thjudicial District
order set aside judicial findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding a
document or instrument 40 to create a lien or claim on December 11, 2013.
There is no dispute regarding the fourth Court of Appeals have appellate
jurisdiction over this matter.
Xll
RECORD REFERENCES
The Reporter's Record will be cited as
follows: [Vol.] RR [page]
The Clerk's Record will be cited as follows:
[Vol.] CR [page]
Comments about the Reporter's Record
Recorder Record in Exhibit 5 has the exhibits presented at the hearing
and the record and Exhibits of the December 9, 2013 t December 11,
2013. The following is a table of contents of this volume.
Table of contents volume 5
Exhibit 1 Motion for case 2013-CI-18394 pages 6 - 81
Secretary of State page 41-64
Exhibit 2 Order for case 2013-CI-18394 pages 82 - 88
Exhibit 3 order setting aside motion case 2013- CI-18394 pages 89-91
Exhibit 4 stock certificate pages 93-94
Exhibit 5 Corporate Minutes pages 95 - 96
Exhibit 6 tax return page 97 - 113
Exhibit 7 Paradiv warranty deeds pages 114- 127
Exhibit 9 Order case 2013-CI-17516 pages 128 -139
Exhibit 10 Commission v. Howard Kahn pages 140-144
Exhibit 11 Rodriguez v. U.S. Tank pages 145-171
Exhibit 12 Routh v. Bank of America pages 172-179
Exhibit.13 Draxz v. American General pages 180-189
Exhibit 14 USA v. Revels pages 200 -203
Exhibit.15 Powers letter to George November 4, 2013 pages 204-205
Exhibit 16 Powers letter to George November 5, 2013 pages 206-208
X111
Exhibit 17 Barkley letter to Peterson November 2013 pages 209-210
Exhibit 18 Powers letter to Peterson November 6, 2013 pages 211-213
Exhibit 19 Gonzales letter to Kahn, September 17, 2007 pages 214- 216
Exhibit 20 Kahn letter to NA Title November 25, 2007 pages 217-225
Exhibit 21 Handwritten by Ripley September 17, 2007 pages 226-227
Exhibit 22 Settlement statement November 13, 2007 pages 228-235
Exhibit 23 Ripley e-mail to Kahn September 20, 2013 pages 236-238
Exhibit 24 Ripley e-mail to Kahn September 8, 2013 pages 239-241
Exhibit 25 Motion to DA Re Joseph Lobley 1990 pages 242-249
Exhibit 26 Summary Judgment Kahn v. National S 1988 pages 250-254
Exhibit 27 Order Jacobson v. Kahn 1983 pages 255- 270
Exhibit 28 Sellers/borrowers affidavit, page 271-272
Exhibit 29 Haynes Boone Time Sheet 3/3 2014 pages 273-274
Exhibit 30 Haynes and Boone time sheet pages.275-281
Exhibit 31 Haynes and Boone time fee sheet pages.282-283
D Exhibit 1 Attorney client contract Pederson Kahn pages 284-292
D Exhibit 2 City of Roanoke v. T Westlake pages 293-294
D Exhibit 2 Kahn's Counterclaim v Ripley pages 295-305
D Exhibit. 3 Organizational Minutes forged by Moore pages 306-311
D Exhibit 4 stock certificate forged by Moore pages 312-313
D Exhibit 5 Motion case 2013-CI-17516 pages 314-340
D Exhibit 6 Secretary of State page 341 - 3 62
D Exhibit 7 Secretary of State page 363 - 365
D Exhibit 8 Vol. 4 of Hearing December 10, 2013 pages 366-525
D Exhibit 8 Vol. 5 of Hearing December 11, 2013 pages 526-559
D Exhibit 8 Vol. 1 Excerpts Hearing Dec.9,10 11 , 2013 pages 560-665
D Exhibit 9 Vol. Master Index Hearing Dec.9- 11, 2013 pages 666-674
D Exhibit 9 Vol. 2 of Hearing December 9, 2013 pages 675-713
D Exhibit 9 Vol. 3 of Hearing December 9, 2013 pages 714-839
D Exhibit 10 Trial EXHIBIT 39 pages 840-882
D Exhibit 10 George letter to Morrison September 19, 2007 page 883
D Exhibit 11 Gonzales letter to Kahn, August 22,, 2007 pages 884-885
XlV
ISSUES PRESENTED
Issue 1) The Trial Court sanction order was an abuse of discretion due to
the A Party cannot be charged monetary sanction under Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem.
Code Ann. § 10.004(d) when the party is representative by counsel.
Issue 2) The Trial Court sanction order was an abuse of discretion due
to filing a fictitious suit is that the filing was not in accordance with Tex. Civ.
Prac. & Rem. Code Ann.§ 10.001
Issue 3) The Trial Court sanction order was an abuse of discretion due to
t5he Rule 11 Agreement was unenforceable and the Court did not have authority to
impose Sanctions.
Issue 4) Court Abused Its Discretion Because It Lacked Jurisdiction To
Rule On Ownership Of Stock.
xv
STATEMENTOF FACTS
After Helvetia Asset Recovery Inc. ("Helvetia")terminated Burton Kahn
("Kahn")'s employment (no evidence of Kahn was employed by Helvetia)
Kahn was a one third owner of the stock in Joabert Development Company
("Joabert") (Owner and builder of the Royal Crest Subdivision) and was working
for benefit of Joabert. 3RR 82
Helvetia was a conduit to accumulate funds for Joabert. Robert Ripley
("Ripley") testified that the funds go to Joabert. 5RR 793. Kahn testified that the
funds go to Joabert. In Helvetia' s original petition funds were earmarked to go to
Joabert. CR m 3 Kahn testified that the money in Helvetia went to Contour and
to Joabert. 5RR 483 Maple Bush Holding Ltd(" Maple Bush") purchased John
Ripley's loan notes on Key Largo Subdivision, using funds of EFG Bank
(Bahamas) to Falcon International Bank 5RR 819. Maple Bush foreclosed on
these loan notes 5RR 820 to become owner of Key Largo subdivision Maple Bush
sold Key Largo to Helvetia 5RR 229
1. Kahn Cannot Be Charged Monetary Sanction Under Tex. Civ, Prac. &
Rem. Code Ann§ 10:1004(D) When The Party IsRepresentative By Counsel
Kahn on November 1, 2013 hired Jay R. Peterson, Attorney at Law, PLCC
("Petterson") to represent him in several cases pending in Bexar County, Texas.
5RR 284, DF Exl
1
Case 2013 CI 18394 was filed on November 5, 2013 and signed by
Petterson. lCR 1-95, 5RR 6-12, 5RR 210, Pl Ex 1
Kahn fired Peterson on November 22, 2013. 5RR 444
2. Appellant filed under the § 5 1.903 because he was President and
Owner ofHelvetia Kahn 'sfiling under §51 903 are not sanctionable.
On October 23 , 2013, Puerto Verde Ltd. a Bahamian Corporation, claimed
to be a 100% stockholder Helvetia filed a lawsuit 2013-CI-17516, Order 5RR
128-139, Motion, 5RR 315-340 in the style of "Action on Fraudulent Lien on
Property. " Ripley swore that the documents in this suit were true , showing
proof that Puerto Verde Ltd. is the owner of Helvetia . These documents were of
Certificate of Formation 5RR 321, Minutes Of The Organizational Meeting Of
The Board Of Directors Of Helvetia Asset Inc. A for-profit Corporation dated
August 17, 2015 (:Original Minutes") 5RR 322 and a stock certificate 001 dated
August 20, 2007. 5RR 327
The Original Minutes stated that the offer of stock was to Puerto Verde Ltd.
5RR 324 But the stock certificate stated Puerto Verde Inc. The stock certificate
was signed by Kenneth Moore ("Moore") who was named president in the initial
minutes. 5RR 323
On November 5, 2013, Kahn claiming I 00% stockholder Helvetia filed a
lawsuit 2013-CI-18394 , in the style of "Action on Fraudulent Lien on Property.
2
Motion lCRl,, Order lCR 76. In that Motion Kahn's Attorney Jay R Petterson
("Petterson") claims that the documents included in 2013-CI-17516 are forgeries.
The form of the stock certificate was not the correct form. 5RR 10, 5RR 68
Ripley did not contact Terry George ("George") the organizer and attorney for
Helvetia for the proper form of certificate. 5RR 536, 738 George testified that he
never provided any copies of the minutes to anyone but Burt Kahn. 5RR 544
Ripley stated he did not have the form of the stock certificate so he made one up
and faxed the certificate to his brother John Ripley from Toronto, Canada. 5RR
797. There are no fax markings on the certificate so that faxing is questionable.
Ripley never contacted George until September 2013, 5RR 738.
Moore testified that he never issued any shares. 5RR 503 Moore testified
that he never sold any shares. 5RR 503 Moore testified that he never received any
money for shares. 5RR 503
Moore testified that two of his signatures were Moore's but not the third
signature. 5RR 509
Moore testified was not the custodian of records 5RR 504,
On August 21, 2007 the Title Company sent Kahn an email wiring
instructions for the $1.2 million money trail exchange. Robert Ripley took this
document and crossed out sender and in his own handwriting that stated "Please
transfer 1.2 million USD to my escrow agent as outlined in these instructions. The
3
funds will be used to capitalize a Texas holding (-hold) co. and in return Puerto
Verde will receive 1000 shares." 5RR 227 Robert testified that this document was
a receipt from the title company however Robert crossed out the name of the Title
Company' s sender. 5RR 831 Ripley testified that the funds for the transfer came
from the Ripley family trust. 5RR 571 There are no Bank records of this transfer
and there are no records of the title company that this document was in existence
and was given or received.
Robert testified that Scott Morrison ("Morrison") was the trust officer for
the Bahamian bank 5RR 705 and as of October 22, 2007 he did not have any
documentation on the ownership. 5RR 704-705 These instructions were never sent
to Morrison but Morrison sent the transfer funds. Ripley testified that he owns
both Maple Bush and Puerto Verde Ltd. 5RR 799 Ripley testified that the funds
used to purchase the notes were from computer company he closed down. 5RR
746 On February 8, 2008. Ripley's sent email to Kahn again questioning
ownership 5RR 573. Ripley does not have the original stock certificate 5RR 801
nor the receipt from the Title Company nor the minutes of the original meeting,
that he claimed in his affidavits and testimony previously cited above.
Ripley submitted to the court Exhibit 39 5RR 840, DF Ex 10 which he
called a kit. 5RR844 Ripley claimed that was provided by Mr. Terry George.
5RR743 George testified that he never provided any copies to anyone but Burt
4
Kahn. 5RR 544 Exhibit 39 was comprised of transmittal and instruction letter, By
laws and the Minutes Of The Organizational Meeting Of The Board Of Directors
Of Helvetia Asset Inc. A for-profit Corporation dated of August 8, 2,007.(" August
8, 2007 minutes") The transmittal does not have any information on who has sent it
nor is there a signature but it does state to review and call if there are any changes.
5RR 851-882 The By laws and August 8, 2007 has George's signature on dated
August 8, 2007 as of these documents are final. George testified that he never
provided any copies to anyone but Burt Kahn. 5RR 544 George testified that he
Exhibit 39 was not his work. 5RR 549-557 The shares to be issued to Puerto
Verde, Inc. 1000. are written in pencil. 5RR 553 Also per August 8, 2007 minutes
state that George resigned on August 8, 2007. Ripley testified that he received
Exhibit 39 by courier in Canada but does not have any envelope that it came in.
5RR 738 Ripley testified that this document was specially flown in to San
Antonio from Canada for the injunction hearing. 5RR 711 The bylaws state in
pencil the offices to be 6751 Walzem which is different from the minutes of
August 17, 2007 which has George' s address. 5RR 393
3 Court Did Not Have Authority To Impose Sanctions
On Unenforceable Rule 11 Agreement.
On November 15, 2013 Appellant's attorneys and Peterson and Kathleen
Goodman ("Goodman") signed a Rule 11 Agreement without Kahn' s, consent to
5
any of the details 5RR 442. Kahn fired Petterson and Goodman. 5RR 444, At the
injunction Judge Pozza stated that she could not enforce the Rule 11 Agreement
5RR661
4 Court Abused Its Discretion Because The Court Lacked
Jurisdiction To Rule On Ownership OfStock.
The Courts first statement twas "So we're not on the merits today? 2RR 5
The court stated on the issue of who owns the stock, "Well that's a subject of
a different type of motion that is the one right now. But you're certainly welcome
to urge that to some court when you file a proper motion." 3RR 20.
6
SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT
Tex, Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 10.004(d) does not authorize the
award of monetary sanctions against Appellant for an act when Kahn was
represented by counsel. Appellant was represented by counsel and any monetary
sanctions should be stricken .
Appellant filed Under § 5 1. 903 Because He Was Owner And President Of
Helvetia and the filing have evidentiary support and him was not fictitious and
should have not been sanctioned for making a legal contention claim of ownership.
Court Did Not Have Authority To Impose Sanctions On Unenforceable
Rule 11 Agreement.
Court Abused Its Discretion Because It Lacked Jurisdiction To Rule On
Ownership Of Stock.
7
ARGUMENT AND AUTHORITIES
BACKGROUND
Burton Kahn ("Kahn") ("Appellant") and John Ripley founded the Joabert
Development Company ("Joabert") in 2006 to develop and sell housing lots in
Northeast San Antonio. Appellant did all the work and John Ripley supplied the
funds. John Ripley sold some of his properties in order to supply funds for
Joabert. One of these properties was a subdivision named Key Largo, which John
Ripley foreclosed on himself. The foreclosed property was sold to a holding
corpora ti on named Helvetia As set Recovery, Inc. ( " Helvetia " ).
Appellant' s responsibilities was to purchase properties, secure funds, design
subdivisions infrastructure and roadways. construct the design and to do all the
necessary paper work including dealing with local authorities. Kahn never got any
compensation for the eight years that he worked. Kahn had invested
approximately $100, 000 of his own money.
Appellant was selling lots from the subdivision to provide Joabert with
construction funds. The relationship ended in August 26, 2013 and Appellant was
holding approximately $290,000 of funds slated to go to Joabert. Robert
Ripley("Ripley"), John's brother was not a stockholder in Joabert. 5RR 809-810
Ripley wanted to take the Helvetia property for himself. The shares of Helvetia
were never purchased and to protect Helvetia/Joabert from Ripley, Appellant
8
purchased the 1000 shares. 5RR408-410 Knowing there was a $1.2 million debt,
and the property would go to Joabert like all the other items Appellant purchased.
On September 16, 2013, Robert Ripley and John Ripley went to Randolph Brooks
Federal Credit Union and submitted over 50 pages of documents to the bank to
take over Helvetia' s bank account. 5RR 794 John and Robert Ripley were refused
access.
On October 23, 2013 Appellee filed a lawsuit 2013-CI-17516, claiming that
Puerto Verde Ltd. ("PVL") owned 100% the Helvetia stock. EXHIBIT A. 5RR
314, DF Ex 5 Included in the motion was documentation of Puerto Verde Ltd. 's
ownership.
On November 5, 2013 Appellant filed a lawsuit 2013-CI-18394, claiming
that Appellant owned 100% the Helvetia stock. EXHIBIT B lCRl, DF Ex 5.
Included in the motion was detailed explanations why documentation of 2013-CI-
17516 was a forgery.
At an Injunction Hearing was held on December 9- 11, 2013, Appellant
was ordered to place the funds into the registry of the court . A sanction hearing
was conducted in March 3 and 4 , 2014 and Appellant was sanctioned for filing a
fictitious suit but not his attorney who signed the pleading and for withdrawal of
an unenforceable Rule 11 Agreement. (EXHIBIT C Order Final Judgment
and Order of Sanctions ) 3CR229
9
ISSUE 1
KAHN CANNOT BE CHARGED MONETARY SANCTION UNDER TEX.
CIV,PRAC. &REM CODE§ 10:1004(D)WHEN1HEPARTYIS
REPRESENTATIVE BY COUNSEL
On November 1, 2013 Kahn hired Jay R Petterson as his representative in
the series of lawsuits involving the case EXHIBIT D.
On November 3, 2013 Petterson spent 7 hours reviewing documents and
preparing Motion For Findings And Conclusions Of Law, review and organize
exhibits and statute.
On November 5, 2013 Peterson spent 4 hours reviewing emergency motion
for discovery filed by adverse party, prepared final drafts of Motions Findings And
Conclusions Of Law and travel to and from court. Peterson signed the Motion and
had an Ex Parte hearing with Hon. Judge John D Gabriel, who signed order.
EXHIBITB
The employment contract (EXHIBIT D) between Kahn, and Peterson shows
Kahn as Client and Petterson as the attorney.
The motion for § 51. 903 is outlined in the statute EXHIBIT E ." Movant
further acknowledges that movant may be subject to sanctions as provided by Chapter
10 Civil Practice And Remedies Code, if this motion is determined to the frivolous." In
Nath V Texas Children's Hospital And Baylor College OfMedicine, 12-0620 (Tex.
8-29-2014) states:
10
However, Chapter I 0 provides that a claim that lacks a
legal or factual basis - without more - is sanctionable.
TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE§ I 0.001 ; see also
Low, 221 S.W.3d at 617. Legally, the claim must be
warranted by existing law or a nonfrivolous argument to
change existing law. TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE
§ 10.001 (2). But Chapter 10 expressly prohibits monetary
sanctions against a represented party based on the legal
contentions in a pleading. Id. § I 0.004( d) ("The court
may not award monetary sanctions against a represented
party for a violation of Section 10.001(2). ").
Accordingly, the trial court could not have properly
awarded sanctions against Nath for groundless legal
contentions in his tortuous interference claim.
Chapter I 0 requires that each factual contention must
have evidentiary support or be likely to receive it after a
reasonable opportunity for discovery. Id. § 10.001(3);
Low v. Henry, 221 S.W.3d at 616-17.
InSwanbergv. Swanberg, 01-12-00375-cv(Tex.App.-Houston [I st Dist.]
8-22-2013) States
"But section 10.004(d) specifically provides that "[t]he
court may not award monetary sanctions against a
represented party for a violation of Section I 0.001 (2)."
Id.§ 10.004(d); see also Benavides v. Knapp Chevrolet,
Inc., No. 01-08-00212-CV, 2009 WL 349813, at *5 (Tex.
App.-Houston [1st Dist.] Feb. 12, 2009, no pet.)
(overturning sanctions award under chapter I 0 when trial
court's monetary sanctions "could only have been based
on section 10.001(2)"). Because the order awarded
sanctions based on a violation of section 10.001(2) and
Mark was represented by counsel when he filed his
petition, the monetary award against him was a violation
of section 10.004(d).
In Gomer v. Davis, 419 S.W.3d 470 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2013)
11
states:
Section 10.004(d), however, provides that the trial court
"may not award monetary sanctions against a represented
party for a violation of Section 10.001(2)." TEX. Civ.
PRAC. & REMCODE ANN.§ 10.004(d) (Vernon 2002).
Here, the trial court imposed $5,000 in sanctions against
Gomer, a represented party. Under these facts, therefore,
section 10.001(2) cannot support this sanctions award
against Gomer, although Gomer's attorney may be
sanctioned under this section. See Univ. of Tex. at
Arlington v. Bishop, 997 S.W.2d 350, 357 (Tex.App.-
Fort Worth 1999, pet. denied)~ see also Loeffler v. Lytle
Indep. Sch. Dist., 211 S.W.3d 331, 349-50 (Tex.App.-
San Antonio 2006, pet. denied) (holding that because
attorney decides which legal claims to file and party
provides, at most, factual basis for claims, party "should
not be punished for their attorney's conduct unless the
party is implicated apart from having entrusted its legal
representation, and trial court abused its discretion in
sanctioning party under Chapter 10).
In this case Appellant's only action was the claiming of his property. Each
allegation in 2013-CI-18394 was supported by a nonfrivolous argument. The
injunction hearing of December 9 - 11 , 2013 showed that the statement of facts
and all the allegations made in the motion were true. Petterson did all the
necessary investigations. George had no final say in the motion and was too ill to
participate. George was also a represented party as stated in the Appellee's First
Amended Motion for Sanctions 2CR 135 That is the reason why he recommended
Goodman who then recommended Petterson.
CONCLUSION ISSUE 1
12
Based on above, the trial court abused its discretion by sanctioning
Appellant who was represented by attorney, Peterson.
ISSUE 2
2 .. KAHN FILED UNDER THE § 5 1.903 BECAUSE HE WAS OWNER
AND PRESIDENT OF HELVETIA KAHN'S FILING UNDER §51 903 IS
NOT SANCTIONABLE
The shares of Helvetia were never purchased and to protect Helvetia/Joabert
from Ripley, Appellant purchased the 1000 shares. EXHIBIT H 5RR 93 PL Ex 4.
Appellant was president and director of Helvetia according the Secretary of State
except for the period from September 20, 2013 to October 4, 2013.SRR 41-64 The
issue in the dispute is who owns the shares of Helvetia.
STOCK CERTIFICATE
Robert Ripley claims that he purchased the shares for Helvetia from Moore
on August 20, 2007. 5RR 327 EHIBIT G, DF Ex.4 His claim is based on the
stock certificate. 5RR 796 Ripley claims that he did not have correct form of
certificate 5RR 10, 5RR 68 so he made one on his computer 5RR 743 and did not
contact George the originator and attorney of Helvetia. 5RR 536,738 Ripley who
was in Canada then faxed the blank certificate which he had just created to his
brother John in San Antonio. 5RR 743 There are no fax documentation on the
certificate 1 similar to the fax sent by Appellee to Secretary of State .. 5RR 300,
13
5RR 354 Ripley then claims that he was faxed back the certificate after Moore
signed the certificate but does not have a copy. 5RR 801 Again there are no fax
documentation marks on the certificate. Moore testified that he did not issue any
stock. 5RR 501 Moore testified that he did not get any money. 5RR 503 Moore
testified that two of the three signatures on his but not the third signature. 5RR 509
Moore testified that he was not the custodian of records which the stock certificate
stated he was. 5RR 504 .
The name on the site certificate is Puerto Verde Inc, yet Ripley is claiming
that the owner is Puerto Verde Ltd.
To sum up the testimony at this juncture of the testimony and
documentation of the stock certificate: Ripley claimed that he faxed without faxed
documentation on the form that was not according to the official minutes to his
brother John Ripley who had Moore sign and issue the certificate that Moore
claimed he never issued. The certificate had a third signature which was not
Moore's.
EXHIBIT F.
Ripley claims that he received a receipt from the title company $1.2 million
and payment of $1,000 for shares in a Hold co on September 17, 2007 5RR394
EXHIBIT F, PL Ex.21 Although the receipt states Hold Co Ripley meant
Helvetia. This receipt is only written on a Tile Company memo of August 21,
14
2013. It does not state who received it. If it is wiring instructions why would the
title company give a receipt?. Who in the title company gave this receipt?
When EXHIBIT F was submitted to the Court it was objected by Appellant
on the grounds of hearsay and authenticity. Afterward Appellee's attorney asked
"this is your handwriting. Right? Answer "That is my handwriting. The court then
admitted the document. 5RR 687 This document was written on the Land America
Lawyers Title Company of San Antonio ("Title company") s email on August 21, 2007
and the document was handwritten on September 17, 2007. The self serving handwriting,
does not make the document authentic ..
In Conner v, Johnson, 02-03-31 6-cv (Tex App -Ft Worth 10-28-.2004)
"The facts: stated :should not be. self-serving.
Travelers Companies. v. Wolfe 838 S.W.2d 708, 714
(citing Duncan v Smith, 393 S.W.2d 798, 80304 (Tex. 1
965)) (holding that not only should the statement be
against interest but also that the "facts stated" should be
against interest because that increases the. likelihood of
its truth)
This document EXHIBIT F is completely self -serving and should not
have been admitted and the Court abused its discretion by allowing EXHIBIT
F to be in evidence and has caused an improper judgment of the Temporary
Injunction. Hearing of December 9-11,2013 and this Final judgment and
Sanction Order.
15
The document EXHIBIT F was not presented in 2013-Cl-17516 as a
exhibit to show Ownership. Ownership was questioned by Robert Ripley in a
email dated February 8, 2008 .5RR573 The Banker Scott Morrison, 5RR 705
who issued the $1.2 million transfer on September 17, 2007 but on October 22,
2007 did not have any documentation as to the ownership of the stock of
Helvetia . 5RR 704-705. If Morrison did not have any documentation , then
Morrison did not get EXHIBIT F. Robert Ripley testified that the funds came
from the Ripley family trust.5RR571,
It EXHIBIT F is proof of ownership, then the stock certificate mentioned
above must be of forgery. There was only 1000 shares available so there can be
only one sale.
In Solano v. Landamerica Commw., 02-07-152-cv (Tex.App.-Ft. Worth
12-4-2008) states:
If a person signs another's name to a document with
authority to do so, there is no forgery. See In re Estate of
Flores, 76 S.W.3d 624, 630 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi
2002, no pet.) (explaining that "forgery is defined as
altering, making, completing, executing, or
authenticating a writing so that it purports to be the act of
another who did not authorize that act"); First Coppell
Bank v. Smith, 742 S.W.2d 454, 460 (Tex.App.-Dallas
1987, no writ), overruled on other grounds, Fortune
Prod. Co. v. Conoco, Inc., 52 S.W.3d 671 , 678 (Tex.
2000) (concluding that forgery was established because
the witness testified "unequivocally that she did not
authorize anyone to sign her name to the deed of trust");
16
In this case the stock certificate was altered by placing a signature that was
Moore's and thus is a forgery.
MINUTES OF THE ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING
In order to get the minutes to correct the Inc. or Ltd. suffixes,, Ripley
submitted to the court Exhibit 39 EXHIBIT J which he called a kit. Ripley
claimed that was provided by Mr. Terry George. 5RR735 George testified that he
never provided any copies to anyone but Burt Kahn. 5RR 544 George testified that
Exhibit 39 EXHIBIT J was not his work. 5RR 549,--5RR 557 Exhibit 39
EXHIBIT J was comprised of an instructional transmittal letter, By Laws and the
initial meeting minutes of August 8, 2,007. The transmittal does not have any
information on who has sent it nor a signature but it does state to review and call if
there are any changes. 5RR 851-882 The By Laws and initial minutes have
George's signature on dated August 8, 2007 as if to make these documents final.
George testified that the signatures looked like his but the documents were not the
documents George gave to Kahn. 5RR 548 The shares to be issued to Puerto
Verde, Inc. 1000. is written in pencil. 5RR 553 Also per August 8, 2007 minutes
state that George resigned on August 8, 2007. Robert testified that he received
Exhibit 39 EXHIBIT J by courier in Canada but does not have any envelope that
it came in. 5RR 738 Ripley testified that this document was specially flown in to
San Antonio from Canada for the injunction hearing. 5RR 711 The bylaws state
17
in pencil the offices to be 6751 Walzem which is different from the minutes of
August 17, 2007 which has George' s address. 5RR 393
QUESTIONS FROM EVIDENCE PRESENTED
1. What was the date that Puerto Verde Ltd purchased the stock?
a)Was it on August 20, 2007, on the certificate form signed by Moore
who never received any funds and never issued stock and was never a
custodian of records and who did not sign the third signature on the
certificate that was faxed without fax markings?
b) Was the date September 17, 2007 the wiring instructions from
Morrison who never knew of the transfer instructions and from the funds of
the Ripley Family Trust and not from Puerto Verde Ltd. ' s Bank account.
2. Who purchased the stock of Helvetia?
a) Was the purchase on August 20, 2007, Puerto Verde Inc or Puerto
Verde Ltd?
b) Was the purchase on September 17, 2007 Puerto Verde Inc or Ltd ?
c) Was the purchase on September 17,, 2007 Stock was not for
Helvetia but for Hold Co
d) On September 17, 2007 the transfer funds came from the Ripley
Family Trust per testimony of Ripley, 5RR 571 Is the owner of the
shares per the handwritten note, the Ripley Family Trust?
18
e) There are no bank statements for these transfers. Who did them?
3. What is the date of the minutes of the organizational of Helvetia?
a) Was the date on August 17, 2007, as per Case No 2013-CI-17516
or August 8, 2007 per Exhibit 39 EXHIBIT J?
b) Was the date per Organizer, attorney George or was it according to
the specially flown in to the hearing document with blanks and
penciled fill ins?
The maneuvers of Appellee show that a conspiracy occurred and that there is
a great deal of perjury in regards to the ownership of the stock of Helvetia.
Appellant requests that this Appellate Court inform the District Attorney of Bexar
County to investigate the possibility of Subornation of Perjury by Werner A,
Powers and Lisa S. Barkley.
CONCLUSION ISSUE 2
Based on the evidence presented and in the questions that have arisen from
this evidence establishes that Petterson did not file a frivolous motion because he
had evidentiary support for each allegation.
ISSUE 3
3 Court Did Not Have Authority To Impose Sanctions On Unenforceable
Rule 11 Agreement
The trial court Judge Tanner imposed Sanctions on Appellant. April 1, 2014.
Court Order 1.... based, on the attempted withdrawal of the unauthorized Rule
19
I !Agreement. 3CR 229 At the Injunction. hearing on December: 9,, 2013 to
December 11, 2013 the issue to enforce the Rule 11 Agreement was brought to the
court, Judge Pozza stated .".Well I am not. sure ..... You can brief it if you like, but
I'm not sure the Court can enforce the Rule 11 Agreement, because it does not seem
that Mr. Kahn perhaps either never consented. or withdrew his consent"' Thus Judge
Pozza ruled orally that without a motion or a briefing she could, not enforce the Rule
11 Agreement. There was never any further motions or briefing. In InRe Guerrero,
440 S.W.3d 917 (Tex.App.-Amarillo-2014)
Rendition of judgment is the pronouncement by the court of
its conclusions and decision upon the matter submitted to it
for adjudication. Buffalo Bag Co. v. Joachim, 704 S.W.2d
482, 483 (re App -Houston [1 4th Dist 11986, writ refd nre.).
A trial court .renders judgment when it officially announces
its decision either orally in open court or by a memorandum
filed with the clerk of the court CometAluminum Co v
Dibrell, 450 S W 2d 56, 58 (Tex 1970) (ong proceeding) If a
trial court's order is adequately reflected in the reporter's
record, a formal written order is not essential to obtaining
mandamus relief
Prior to any additional motions or briefs the Court had stated it was "not
sure". This is defined as reasonable doubt, Ex Parte Preston, 833 8W.24 515
(Tex.Cr.App. I 992). The issues were decided not to enforce the Rule 11
Agreement at that time unless subsequenfAction was done to further litigate the
validity of the Rule 11 Agreement. No subsequent action occurred and therefore
the Court could not enforce the Rule 11 Agreement. This makes the Rule 11
20
Agreement unenforceable. With no subsequent action the Rule 11 Agreement was
fully litigated and collaterally, estoppel will prevent the Rule 11 Agreement from
any other action.
Kahn did not review the Rule 11 Agreement prior to it being signed by
Petterson. The employment. contract (EXHIBIT D) 5RR 284-291 between Kahn and
Peterson states on page 3 that "it is the attorney's responsibility to advise you on legal
ramifications of the decisions but-you must make. the actual decisions" Kahn did not
make that decision to sign away I 00% of Appellant' s work that he had done and get
0% back When Kahn realized that Petterson had signed away Kahn's rights including
a jury trial Kahn fired. Petterson. 55RR 464 The withdrawal of the rule 1.1 agreement
is a Contract RIGHT. In Gym-N-1 Playgrounds v. Snider, 220 S.W.3d 905 (Tex.
2007)
Texas strongly favors parties freedom of contract BMG
Direct Mktg.,Inc.v. Peake, 178 S.W.3d 7763 ,767 (Texas
2005)
In Burnaman v. Heaton , 150 Tex. 333 (1951)240 S.W.2d 288
" The judgment was rendered on the agreement of the
attorneys and was therefore a consent judgment. 25
Tex.Jur., p. 385, et seq.; 49 C.J.S., Judgments, § 173,
page 308, et seq. A valid consent judgment cannot be
rendered by a court when consent of one of the parties
thereto is wanting. "
This sentiment is echoed in many cases:
In City ofRoanoke v. T. ofWestlnke, 111 S.W.3d 617 (Tex.App.-Ft. Worth2003)
.9
21
"We agree that an attorney retained for litigation is
presumed to possess authority to enter into a settlement on
behalf of a client. Williams v. Nolan, 58 Tex. 708, 713-14
(1883); Walden v Sanger, 250 S.W.2d 312, 316; Dunlnp v.
Villareal, 91 S.W.2d 1124, 1125 (Tex.Civ.App.-San
Antonio 1936, no writ). This is a presumption of actual
authority, however, and may be rebutted by affirmative
proof that the client did not authorize his attorney to enter
into the settlement. Walden, 250 S.W.2d at 316; Johnson v.
Rancho Guadalupe, inc., 789 S.W.2d 596, 598 (Tex. App. -
Texarkana 1990, writ denied) (op. on rehg) (noting that there
is no implied authority for an attorney to release the very
right or interest he is employed to protect); Fail v. Lee, 535
S.W.2d 203, 207-08 (Tex. Civ.App. -Fort Worth 1976, no
writ)"
InJohnson v. Rancho Guadalupe Inc., 789 S.W.2d 596(Tex.App.-Texarkana1 990)
An attorney is a special agent and is presumed to have
authority to act for, and institute legal proceedings in behalf
of any person whom he professes to represent. Slattery v.
Adams, 279 S.W.2d 445 (Tex.Civ.App. - Beaumont 1954),
affirmed, 156 Tex. 433, 295 S.W.2d 859 (1956). However,
there is no implied authority for an attorney to release the
very right in interest he has been employed to secure and
protect. Cetti v. Dunman, 26 Tex. Civ. App. 433 [26 Tex.
Civ. App. 433], 64 S.W. 787 (1901, writ refd). By virtue of
his employment, an attorney does not have an implied
power to compromise an action which he has been engaged
to defend. Early v. Bums, 142 S.W.2d 260 (Tex.Civ.App. -
Beaumont 1940, writ refd). A compromise by an attorney
without his clients knowledge or consent, which has the
effect of depriving the client of his day in court, is an
unauthorized act. Pierce v. Terra Mar Consultants, inc.,
566 S.W.2d 49 (Tex.Civ.App. - Texarkana 1978, writ
dismd). Where a substantial right has been violated by the
attorneys entering into an unauthorized compromise
agreement, a judgment based thereon will be set aside.
McMillan v. McMillan, 72 S.W.2d 611 (Tex.Civ.App. -
Dallas 1934, no writ).
22
CONCLUSION ISSUE 3
Thus Appellant had a right to withdraw from the Rule 11 Agreement and it was
an abuse of discretion for the Court to make an arbitrary and unreasonable order.
ISSUE 4
Ruling on ownership was not set for the Sanction Hearing.
The Courts first statement twas " So we're not on the merits today? 2RR 5
The court stated on the issue of who owns the stock, "Well that's a subject of a
different type of motion that is the one right now. But you're certainly welcome to
urge that to some court when you file a proper motion. " 3RR 20.
Thus the court declared that the ownership of the stock was not in her subject
matter jurisdiction at the hearing.
In Entergy Corp. v. Jenkins, 01-12-00470-cv (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.]
11-6-2014) states:
"Subject matter jurisdiction is 'essential to a court's
power to decide a case."' City ofHouston v. Rhule, 417
S.W.3d 440, 442 (Tex. 2013) (per curiam) (quoting
Bland Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Blue, 34 S.W.3d 547, 553-54
(Tex. 2000)). "Without jurisdiction the court cannot
proceed at all in any cause~ it may not assume
jurisdiction for the purpose of deciding the merits of the
case." Fin. Comm'n ofTex. v. Norwood, 418 S.W.3d 566,
578 (Tex. 2013) (quoting Sinochem Int'l Co. v. Malaysia
Int'l Shipping Corp., 549 U.S. 422, 431, 127 S. Ct. 1184,
1191 (2007)). "The failure of a jurisdictional requirement
deprives the court of the power to act (other than to
11
23
determine that is has no jurisdiction), and ever to have
acted, as a matter of law. 11 City ofDeSoto v. White, 288
S.W.3d 359, 393 (Tex. 2009) (quoting Univ. ofTex. Sw.
Med. Ctr. v. Loutzenhiser, 140 S.W.3d 351, 359 (Tex.
2004)). Thus, 11 [a] judgment is void if rendered by a court
without subject matter jurisdiction. 11 In re United Servs.
Auto. Ass'n, 307 S.W.3d 299, 309 (Tex. 2010) (orig.
proceeding). 11 [N]ot only may an issue of subject matter
jurisdiction 'be raised for the first time on appeal by the
parties or by the court', a court is obliged to ascertain that
subject matter jurisdiction exists regardless of whether
the parties questioned it. 11 Id. at 306 (quoting
Loutzenhiser, 140 S.W.3d at 358) (emphasis in original)~
City ofAllen v. Pub. Util. Comm'n of Tex., 161 S.W.3d
195, 199 (Tex.App.-Austin 2005, no pet.) ("[T]he
question of jurisdiction is fundamental and can be raised
at any time in the trial of a case or on appeal. 11 ) .
CONCLUSION ISSUE 4
By the Courts statement it had no jurisdiction to determine ownership at the
hearing. Thus the Sanction Order is void.
CONCLUSION
This Appellate Court should reverse the Final Judgment and Sanctions
Order based on Tex, Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 10.004(d) does not
authorize the award of monetary sanctions against Appellant for an act when
Kahn was represented by counsel. Appellant was represented by counsel and any
monetary sanctions should be stricken .
24
This Appellate Court should reverse the Final Judgment and Sanctions Order
based on Appellant' s filing under § 5 1.903 because all the allegations had
evidentiary support and was not fictitious.
This Appellate Court should reverse the Final Judgment and Sanctions Order
based on court did not have authority to impose sanctions on the withdrawal of an
unenforceable Rule 11 Agreement.
This Appellate Court should reverse the Final Judgment and Sanctions Order
based on Court Abused Its Discretion Because It Lacked Jurisdiction To Rule On
Ownership Of Stock.
PRAYER
For the reasons, Appellant prays that this Honorable Court of Appeals will
reverse the Final Judgment and Sanctions Order
Respectfully submitted,
.~/~
Burton Kahn. Pro-se
1706 Alpine Cir.,
San Antonio, TX 78248
glentrail@yahoo.com
Tel (210) 408-9199
VERIFICATION
State of Texas §
County of Bexar § Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 132.001
25
My name is Burton Kahn. I am over the age of 18 and am fully competent
to make this unswom declaration. My date of birth is in August 1933 and my
address is 1706 Alpine Circle, San Antonio, Texas 78248. I declare under penalty
of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed in Bexar County, State
of Texas on the day of August 5, 2015.
~/~
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
Based on a word count run in Microsoft Word 2010 , this brief contains
5,889 words, excluding the caption, identity of the parties and counsel, statement
regarding oral argument, table of contents, index of authorities, statement of the
case, statement of issues presented, citations to record, signature, proof of service,
certificate of compliance, and appendix, pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 9.4.
``
Burton Kahn Pro-se
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify that a copy of this Motion was served on Appellee, Helvetia Asset
Recovery Inc. through counsel of record on August 5, 2015 by
Elizabeth Conry Davidson
Attorney at Law
926 Chulie Drive
San Antonio, Texas 78216
(210) 380-4899 telephone
(210) 225-2300 facsimile
conrydavidson@gmail.com
Burton Kahn Pro-se
26
APPENDIX
A. Motion 2013-CI-17516 5RR 314 DF EX 5
B. Motion 2013-CI-18394 lCRl. 5RR 6 PL Ex 1
C. Final Judgment and Sanction Order 3CR229
D. Petterson Contract.5RR 284 DF Ex 1
E. Statute § 51. 903
F. Wiring Instructions Handwritten Receipt 5RR 226 PL Ex 21
G.Appellee's Stock certificate in 2013-CI-17516 5RR 327 DF Ex 4
H. Appellant's Stock certificate 5RR 93 Pl Ex 4
J. Exhibit 39 5RR 840 DF ExlO
EXHIBIT A
." .•
Jl,{llE~ A PURPORTED LIEN §
.@R: CLAIM AGATNSTHELVETlA §
ASSET RECOVER.Y ~ JNC, §
§
Property Owner §
§
JlJDICJ,,(L FINDJNG OF ll"A:CT A.ND. m1aus.ION OF;J.A)V
REGARQ~ A DQCUMEN.T U&lMSTRUMlGNT
PllRPQl[lNG TO.ClfEAfl;;;\ EIENt>R CLAIM
On the ~!l-Y of 0~ . -. ~·lt`` .m. the abo~. ~iitltd and oumbe1Cd
.cause~ this ~µit ·Q;.t.<.iewcd a mo~ veriti~ Pl afr~vit, of Robert "R~pley and the
doourmmaq1m [*bed. tltereto. .Adgi"tiona.lly, t'he ~ reviewed .the -~1.wammty .Deed' 1 and
. . . ~
there any ootfoc,_ofiM'Coun'-~ l"(:V.B;.wi .tb@ eQ'1.11 having made t}l:euetennination t.¥tll)Beci:sion
rourd be made sc1ie1y on review of the docum.en1ation ~ ih..c authority vested in ·~e Court
undt1-S~apter J, Chapter 5.:t.el1he Texas f'.s0v~ Co&=.
~ Coun finds -as fq~: the W.manty De:edy attached hereto as Exhibit I; the Re~
A
_,.
w~ty l1eed, attache4 bmrto· as Exhibit 2~-and the Correction Wammty Deed, attached tum:f:i>..
~ as Exhibit 3 {CQUectiveJy, the "Wattanty D~tl's!'}, are KOT created bY ·implied or expr~.
i .
consent or agre.e.m.ern ·&r~· ob1igor, d``• 6f the~ owner of the rea.l property or by impli.ed or
~e Watranty o•:1i'tjac~· hereto as ·sx1lil11ls l"'31 do nol ~t Pan;tdw OOrporation any interest ~n
4 the proper~"1d~scribed therein.
l
.4
!
•
Tbe· G()uti makes ,oo :finding· a \l'i! Jwf: iti((dcdyiug claims Qt~ -``~ involwd. and
p . expressly limits its ~of mcl and--co~l111iM1J>f~1,t0 the- teView of ·a m1.~aJ act. The
G
& J!jll!``°'"'"'...;.._.CONCLfSl~_~J!````~--,·-'
~ _ •.....,'A~:ORfNSTRUMENTPURPOR~\WRf.FJW~1lt'tA1M
. . . .. . . .
...
. .. .. .
'•··Mn OF A FACT AND CONCLU~'i"IFJ:.AW
Pitt~
"'T.¥1lr"I
t ()t:l 2-
REGARD!
&ook 164a3 Paoe 313 12r:las
...... .,. •• ...., .... '" .. 11 •• 1· 1 11•·1 • tJt 1A111M'f' ui 1· p ,, "1 ...... ) d ,......... ..... . ± • ... ~ .. - ..... b. "'',..
'Signed On thil! the u rd' day· of . och, ~I .·~. 3
d;;,.~
[
... :,..,~..·.. .
1....
f.
••.
,: ..... .
,: .'
.•.•
•• • • • · . '
·' •
....
.
" .
~
'
' . .
~S11\!CT JUOOE·
/143lzhi8iaW ~-It '11>'1--
BeJ NOIJOO IJOi.l.AR:Sanr;J:.po(lanc! val``~ ··... ·
``~>"
~ (UdUiliiJiiiyfatpow:cmmni}
~-~ LOTt :etocx l LOT~ .~OCKJ LOT l ,BLOCJP Bl.OcXl .LOT' .
``'19f 6, BLOCK 3 µ)T 7, :Ql..O(X.3 LOTS. B.4{~,:l_lHf 9. BLOCK 3 LOT lO,
wt<•.
``J.OT lJ • BLOCK :3 lOT U, BLOCIO LOT· 1);. BLOOK 3 LOT J6 •.BLOClU LOT 17.
8\tXX':3LOT 13~BLOC);3~19' . .
,BLOCK4.Jm''.l,,BiQCl.4Wf5,~l(.4i;Q(~7 Q'tOCKHAlTt,ji.OcK'4LQT9.
=·:tgf.~1;:,=;``·.~i.r/BJ'``'4 ~J~ ~B~1~1-``·
4 3
=:``:·:~i~i!::tat``·:-~:`` 1 ~NLOT24.
,,~' I.OT::a .,.noocx ~ WJ::itt~ $ wr 3 ,nLOOt' ~-~ . ~OCK sLOT$.
9tOCJC,! LOT6 .·~ ji LQ"t::~'i';~ .5 LOTI .BLOCIC5 WT,'P.,.BLOCK SLOf.10,
~ '.!-O"f u . BLOCK' Wt ~,,,.-BLOCK H.ap~. Btc:X;X~UJ)T 14 I BLOCK~ LOT l5.
BUXX:.5.·.Len' "·._'~ LOt 18.· a~,i-ltir J9. ,B~.- .~LOT 20,
. ·_.· . 16. BL<>CK_5JgQ'i''t7,B_t.OCK_.
BLOClt1.U>Tll • BLOCX.:SU>T 22, MCK~WT~-.~'.·51.0T 24 .. ~OOKS LOT25.
Bl.OCX$)LQTJ6:,m.oat5:t()T27.~.n.or:il'.Jll~s LOT~g·``ocK, s LOT 30.
BLOCK H:.OT 3'1 • BLOQ{P:•LOT 3~ ~ ,, .. . . ..
BLOCK 6 UlT1\..'BLOCX 6 UJ:r'.2 .~BLOCK 6;"1$1''3•. BtOCI{ 6:Ldt·A·;:m:.ocx 6 Ld'l''.! .
.BLOCK. 6 LOT6)BUXX6 LOT7;,,-'BLOCK (i LOT' . BLOCK 61.::r:.rr.9 BLOCK~ J..OT.'lO •
J
.et.OCX· 6 LOT n .Bl.OCK 6 LOT J.2-;,.BtOCK nm 13 • BUX!k.·6,t.OT l4 'BLOCK 6 LOT l'-
•.BOOCIC::61Df 16 ,·BLOCK~ LOTU., Bl..OOK6LOT1B. BLOCK6.t.OT 19, BLOCK6 LOT20 •.
BUX:X,l'i.~21 • m.acxis, 411:~. ,'BLOCK 6 rmn ,8LOCK,it::t,QT2-4. Bf.OCK 6 LOT 2$ •·
... · 6 lprl6. BLOCK 6 ~[tJ.~ BLOCK 6
BLOC)( LPT 28.• $.()CJ{ l)';_l;PT29. BLOCK 61.0T~O •
BLOCK,6.:tOT ll • BLQCk -~ ®"32 I
B~ 1 LOT 1 • aLQC'.I( 1 wi;:;zii m:.tJtK 1LOT3. su~:t(~:t"® •. BLOOC. 1 LOT ~ •
~- 7 tor 6. BLQCK 7 LOT1l j,BLQCX 7 LOT I • ~L0\¢1; 1tOT9 • BLOCK 1 LOT 10 •
BLOCK 7--LOT 11 • BLOCK 7``·. $LOCK 7 L01' ~3.J'.`` 7 LOT t4 BLOCJ( 7 LOT ]~ I
.BLOCIC 7 LOT 16 .BLOCK 7 . . ·BJ.QCK 1 LOT 18-. ~ 7 LOT 19. BLOCK 7 ·LOT 20 .
.Bt0(11 LQT-2:1 ~BtocK 7 LOT' .•iJLoCK 1I.Ofn•.~·7w24 I BLOCK 7 LOT~ •
BLOCK.,7·~ 16, BLOCK 1 ~; .· , BLOCK 7 LOT 28 .-'.~ ,7li>T 42. BL()CK,7 LOT 43,
. . ,... ., -.--...,.-.--..,,,,,_,.-...,...-t[ .i=.xHIBIT 1 ~
6oc:umenlT``JudlclAL FINOJNGOFA FACT AND CONCLUSION OF LAWREGARDI
Page3 nf12
•• dbl 11:
.·-n -~"'····I , 1· ft( ......
'RESaRVATIONFmmud~1o``,)'~:·
~ -rishfl-ol-~)l; .. pracripti\'C, .·~. -~ pf m;otd, (It rt.Qt;_ tll ,~y
`` ~ tlD liftll *-' ~.. u.~·-i:bi; pro:pmy; ~tor~-,~
~. fhe-·~·ofniciHJRritec •tuma· .
~ tar.:thnixlriiidimian,:ftltie~·of;wham fneknowl~ -~ 10 thP! ~s
'I . . . . . and
jj'Olll ~- · · '\....._.~
. -r.',l'OJf,"¥ · · '~·- · · ..
...... -~,pan-. sel_It . ``~·to Gnmce the. ,.,nM~
. and co-_n . .,.,,,,..,,f.
!. ~-tth ail ...,~tbe npsoMd `` mm'lf,iiSt •\cmtPftl to-``-~
' bQfif;~ lO ~ ``. hd1i. ·c-.; idimniat«s. ~ or usip ~. ·Qiu.lot
t,l~. 9fllHfm' _. OliUitOr'a hi:in.·"1cf..,.11, -1mi~11o '°'11 ,~ 11:i wanan1. and fv~
dChd an . i si1J8111ar tbe -~ ·m Grao1ce lrtCf ~is-~ ex~ a..binimrOll.
~·l!Mlusigni lphl:il ~t*so1 ~·1awfidlt~ or to claim the same or IUIY
1mdhcao( CKCDt um~ iam:YatioaS tom ad ~om m::~ and~·
I'••,,-'"-·-"·'"
~'fype: JU(ilCJALFlNDING OFA FA£:f,ANiJOONClUSION OF LAW REGAROI
Page•t'of 12
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _..,__...,,:'·"'"'~·~''i'i!.;``~:::.-,....- - - -..--- ·- ·--·-·-..·- .
- • •••- IP\M" t ... •1 • ;JCdb f ~- . ·u. f .... ~... ..~'Ji l .. PJ")i.tJBflt ltlf•'tl•trM&: A
_,
vl
p
4
t
G
~1_
~ N~ 2o13Cl1.751$
' -~--
--· ,,;._ ____ ···--·-.. -·
OQOUl'l'letttl-~;pe: JUDICIAL FINDING Qr; A FACT tiNO-OONCLUSION OF LAW REGAROI
PageS of IZ
..• ..•. 11 u '·": .· .............. --~---
Gf'llMIW·:
Mut>rv ~fl(ji
BBX'.Alt. CCM.B.rY~'TEXAS
``iJ$.A.ND NOllOO:~/JtSana obir gooQaJ!i:!.r.el~c:onsidtmion · ·
``~
·~(.ncJaclina•m,y impDW112114sj_
&L(Q. 3 um i'BUU..31.Qt~ ,;Bt.ocl.1 LOT J. BI.9CK§ EOT4. BLOCl n.ar j .
;~ 1 .ujT ~. BU)C,K ~'.~'.7 .Bl,CICK 3 LOtt.. ~ 3 l.OT 9, Bi:.O(:k 3 LOT 10 •
.ai:bc.K 3 LOT l l BLOCK l"IDf 12. BLOCK 3 LOI' ll B.UJClt;9 LOT 16. BLOCK. 3 l..0Tl1 •.
1IOOcK 1LOT1s:sI.OCKJton• • • ......
• ~4LOTI .BLOCK'.~'Wt·6,lllOCK.4 LOF2,!J•f.O(X4 WT8 .. BLOOK4'L0T9.
JUOCl::'4lDT JO .:Bt.OCJtcX 6 't(j.t :Jft:~ Ii LOT"'``~ YJ. • . • ·.r, - , • .
i. bLOClc1 tOT 1,, BbQCk,1 l.Otl ,isl.OOK:'1'LOT3'`` 7 toT-4, ~:>fttn' S,
·v 9LO(r'l.7'LOT 6 I mxd::"l'LOT 7 ,. BLOCK ?itQ'.ll'IM~ IJtOCK 7 LOT·9:•.J)LOO&,''T LOT 10.
p B~TLOT 11 •.~7U)T12 .. ~)l. ·.,'. lJ.\;,Dux..'1{ n.OT l4·~,l~UlCk1LO'f U
·B1Pm'S.WT1~.D``l:LO'Tl7,~7',:, ~.``K71.0Tl.9i.~JLOT:!:O.
DtqClt 1··LOf 21 BU>erU:LOT22,;.BLlXIC 7 · at1:DCK 1 LOT24. m:.OCK 7 lDT2S
4 Bl£a. i.urt''A:BLOCk 7i.Or27.:"~1wT2t,8li,lcl(: '1tttr-42,8LQClt? IDT 43:
!
p:
G
i~Number.
--.-.2013Cl17S~6
. ----..~, ...
...•.• ~ ...\..~d, ....... D., ...... ."
r:~: ``T·2
DdCtiri14mType: JIJDICIA\,. FINDING Of A FAf;r~!)'<;ONCLUSION OF- LAWR£GARDI
T-
Page6of 12
-------------------·........ __________________
,
. "'""'
-~ :;·
·.•. ~,;...
flLOCK 9 L0f.·1. Bl..OCl 9 uJn,,·9~9 LOT 3 t BLOClt'9LOT 4, B~K 9 or.rt: .. _l'C;t.'i~
:BLOCK. 9 tor 6,,;ISLOCK "Wt i •. :or.ocx.
9lOT a. DL0Cl\>9;LQ.t:9 ~BLOCK. 'P LOT lO.,
BtOCK g LOT' fl •BtOCK 9 wrt1?.9t0CK. 9 LOf 13, IJ~ifi.OT .... BLOCK 9LOT" 1S
•. BLOCK 9'1X1f 16. BtOCK 9~lJ01"17 • BLOCK. 9LOf lit, BLOCK 9UH 19 •. BLOCK 9 LOT
20 .• BLOCX 'l.OT ll .JWX!KUDT ZZ. BLOCK. 9'1.0T 2)., 9LOCK·9 LOT24, 6LOC~ 9
.EQT 2S • m.nctt 9 LOT2&.:8C.Q€K. 9".Lm" 21 • IH.OOK uqr za~.~BLOCIC. 9 .LOT 29 ~BLOCK
ttar :10. BL()CX 9LQT11 ,..~ sa.x.or J:z,. BLOC({' 9·Wfll • BLOO,IC'9LOT14.
````==``TEXASASPIAT'UCOIWWlN
,=``===l';:::
·~.1m1n1-.. .... ~
of~cr ~Iii~
bll llfRd lbt:"""'*t • fudhlt: LWRl'ilC
lirlm .....______ Ario. taxC5
yea-.```````` . . JIYl"W"'"1 . .. . .
tJantm. fbr~.~;of".Wtiiah is~,.•shuf,Jc todm~
;tiom a:I ~·tD·``~h-raaiy, pm:U. IClbi ``·to Gmuice tlm ~.
~with.ID.aaiisiJJ&uls·tbe--·-ldd·~tbmJo·manywiie·belongjngiohhe•l
· finva- o..riori
'"-. . . _.., _ . , - - - ... ~· or 8l!li11118
i...u iUo n--- o..tlCC~• .i...::.:.. _ _ ,,._. -!=Wstmh- a
-~ . •
.~ ..~..cl~·~-```` -:i14;~ '9 ~---i~·
AbliM tll nd ....... lbe ~ to ~ Md `` ~ r:~ adniinistialoB,.
iilliCmt111wuad miptpinltmt,,JICl'flft ~-``or to etaim the .suntor 111.Y
p8n dlllleof. ~ u .0.1he ~ m:.m iwt ~tt(~j;jme hd wanwtfy.
This ``~d,'611.~'4.'2()13'by BUitage 7of12
·- ··-··.-· ""':"ll',,,---.-,.--.
~. W 44 $$ L£4t.• It--..~ ... 'II .I I J~ 6*'-!) , ....... F I. iI •• .. ..• 4 • k.zaiit-"' ~-- . .... 1•·j··-~ M . •.
•·
·'
I,
0
I •
~
i !
:! l
Document Type: JUDICIAL FINDlNGOF A FA.Ct A.NO CONCLUSION OFlAW REGARD!
Page R~f l2
___ _________________
.,.,,,,.,......,... ... - ....... _____
'
~
·
'
'
"
'
.
.
.
.
.
,
.
.
_
,
_
.
,
.
.
.
,
,
.
~
·
-
~
'
'
"
:
.
.
.
·
·
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
qaq. w:"·aF .
, p- lk-1)7' - .~ I •• .;: • • • !W"f ~•'ill• ~ ..
...
PM@WfiJllGIAl.l)f
anM-GJl)lni.'IBXM
~.Mi1DlOIC!l.QOIU.U:•d!llill:·pat1Jii11f._..• ~- r rm.
• 2 ~,... -......... _,:_,_. -a) . ' ., ..•... ' .. ''' '
::t:~·:"',1RL~= s~tBl;~4t~s:Ji~w..
3
•QQi•~&I_I waC~,u .IK«%tiiiti~_:.ill.cD!:r.oi 11 &ua-,t.ai-17
.,_
-~);IOl"ll:•.o,Q(:'ij;·,n· . . .. ~ . ~ •
~-·
p
G.
" -t.~·~·>.
2
4 - .
- - -. -....
., ~ "'''"'~ '~- -~·
-- . ..... .:..:...-=:.::_·-_·-~-. --·....-------
!case.~.``rl75~6 - i}o(;umentl)Pl[Y. JUDICIAL ANDING OF A F#\C'f MDCONCL.us!ONOF' LAmEGARm
Page IO "fll
________________
. ........,,.,.,..,......,.,-... , ____ __ __ ____
---."- ............,,. .,....,.. ....,. ,....
-•1.j ?~t
··~· .i¥t P. ·"' · .u.-4r
• I I •T F ·1• I I I R. - r ll
r·
\I
i
l
'j
II
.,I
I
I
l
0...-: t-
~J
'i.
.. 1
.1
J
Kj
~ .
I Docu~nt scanned 'as
·,
~ filed.
!-'-=-----_-_-"'_-._-_--~.--.----~-
. . . . . --------.-_-..,.,..-.-.,--~\·=-==--·::;::;::j.33~:==__=,=_=_ ..,.........
``Number: 201sc111s1e '~T~pe: JUDICIAL FlNDING.p!\A'fACT AHG·GO!'ICLUSION OF LAW REGAf(DI
~el'lofU ·
--·. . . ···-··----------------``"'!'····- .-
'-'*.!1" q_;;s mr lllJ fl ·* rrn:·;· _; __
Odo/Jer 24·t 1013
_,.,_
OCT 2 ~- 20\3
~l!lnl Type: JUOICIAL FINDING Of A FACT AN.D GQNJi;l,.,"'SlON QP I.AW REGAR DI
F>age: n -arn
·-~-~--....---........,,., , .,1"."~•-T-"tW'.',.:,:;.·~....- · - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
.......
. '
MonoRrOR~liVUWOF~A'l10N.OR
1*DJJMBNT PJl&ft)l\TING ro·CRlm:AMJ;BOllCLc\IM
J'o{ow OOrDcS MoWnt ~.!A&Kt R.;.oveey1 lnc. t~i ud files 1]iis Motion fur
JudlcfaJ. .~l!W -
~;~lous.
-~·-·
••
rRADI
~.pmniaes (;()'~ Movant Helvetia :Asailt Reclcwtty. Inc_ resptedbl~
~that~ ~'mtew tbe~ ~.a . . . .' sworn,
~and ·staes a follows:
I. My rusme i!J:Rtitiert llipJey, I am ~:~W.l!ni!Ninc t2J) ~ ``.ap. and j ha'Vtl
fttlq bOC1'I ·00nvi'1;;d ,,Of~f flk)ny or Of ..,. ~t itlV.QIVing mOi't1 'Uj)!tudc. l • ·6.J~)i
~t cu uaDJddsi'Atnlla111t undcr..>mtn; hm abk l\11-wcar; • r l !im:b7 do awmr.-l.hilt'alt
of'tha f&cts Mn! mthiiAffld~truc and cortcet and wilhlnlftJ ~ knowktf&C.
2. Attached he~ 'u "Exhibit •w• is a true &ml. ~ ·COP)' of Helvetia A$Sei·
IW»v.try, Inc. •s ("'HclYciia~•·1. Ccrttfk:lle of Fcmn•ti~. eff``t1g111t 2, 2001, ·lfioWma that
RtlW&;is mthorizc4fto-JiM J,000 sblris:Cfttock.
-~, Atta~ llc:rcto • Exbibif ~9'·~ •··Wt: and ~ .~ of tfio Mim.itm•o1aho
()rpniUtkm M.~iif'The Board ~b-rs of Hclffria A~vi.ry, Ine.. a Por·Pr.ot'ti
Corporation, daWI:: ii'-~• J7, 200~. `` -'1,000 9h1r:H or :ttotJ;'W..l"uerto Verde, !Ad. $«
.lixhibit "'8" i.t ••
EXHIBi,f 1 l
rA~.'f·
..
',i.!. ..
·e
4. t\ttal:hccl ht!I'~ ·.s Eit~t ..(; .. ~·."! ,trUe and corr=t :copy of Slwe Certffi~e
Number O(fl, datc0 Augast 2(1~ 2001., ~i.t~ Verde Jn;. owm 1.000 mares of
~
l.. I am )nlllidc:nt of'.Puc:.rm v``; i.¢rUNY.~,Ttt!~-'Purportt~ t0 D:litifir property
U~o''ft»m .HBivmia ta l'aradiv Corporatii~L,[l~"Bt``p may upon~
~·ll.libc'Soald.,.~ffi:.Iif»i~r~dnn may~Ji!µeBLi\bor~'tl'iaraoflW;i·.
~·~ f0r·..onai~'i1~•ft!\icti~ nf any;~·rir inianslblC 'l;lelldlttO the'
~,..~mothcr'_,
""'``"';"- ...-``.:< . .ll!Y ~indornat1d1i*l.Da"
......h•1CJ1'1 . .• ,... U\8 ~-·
. -~
· t ll90'Y· otJteS
- ·' ·
~pct~dllit.nCt!I fol_~tec. w ~ p:rrorma:S,.Olhrz_.uitiiil~'f$1;.~
~- Qr sa:vi'l"ttes of.il!fy 9.hrt Olrpuralion. dom$i~,W Jm;tign, oidtber tntity.
MNK AceiWNT
3
--·
.
Upcm. ii:sotioD dD1
. . }'-~ · ~td. lil'lrl l!drri'll~t~rm•oft11eSiam'OJ''fmsa11d~
~uifog.~'lid ~t'l(l "-ilhMldiiie lll'Ci,aiflrer·~
l1pcn.~oa~Y-·``-``·ti,,.riod. it was
. lttSQLvtPiiJt'lhtrliit!Ei::fiJ?~iflhc Hwira,..(~ e aoi``· t~f~!l``!i·
~fof.tJR``ion a·n ``n~!I ancl P'l"'t$ `` bel!Ollai~:"*-``~·
~J:I to ``'Lill lawful bWii~Hntf.aetMtir.s, 1md·-t.
'
~AUFICAT.ln`` OTlft'rR )ll'IUSDJCTSONS
Upon ~Oii duiyll'.l. .)'Mecmckld PTid~tricd. ilWts
'RF.SOLY!D.~:fcr thepurpl:il:orawhctri:ting die 1Ni•~on'16&>:``
Ui.~·~·~'°11 Dli`` tiC~i.;Mni~$w~orany fercip:ooUr'tty in wbich'it i!I
,... ., m ~ped'ii!u .for~ `` cl.=im~!``,"' b11r\WJcL lrotiii'le!l!J, ·t.M prciper nffi~ r:tf
1lMI austrieu ~o·we here~..aid.Jum``m:qpP.Oint andsutii!itituEelll ~·agmwcr
~ Jbt:·~ct af~,ti) CbteruUc'a111hb11DF,-Ow. locaiicn'Of,all ~ lllltutor)I
~ ._.,10 make and fil• all ll&'C!IAAl)·r.crtinwtes..iepom. ~.of~ 111\d other
t~!lilrli'maJtll: r£qUiJed,.~tM •111•~ltf~Ut:l·~1erritixy. ~·OTCOW'IEI\' ti)
IUlbi'.riia ~ 6ulincss Corporation·u1 tll.ll).'l*!L hul41WS!!.1~.
JlUR.TH£.R l!'fS'fltllm"IOl'i8 TO OF111C£'RS
Qport moJfoi1 •'Yi....~;~d.. jt was
4
-
Upon ~tJJ. iljlym111&, t.eCOUWan4 ~it ~
D._c: Wal, Feb.,2Q; iji``tJ0.:43 Ml:
Subjelll: Fwd: J(ey'Uijo
To: .Bob A ~.ipley <:ranclier®OO@!milili.oom>
Dc:ar Bott:
S~-``ied minures ofmeetlnt wi({'llh dcc:liriii
o~ip.
Please conttct if you ticc:d.ttiOtt.
Burt
!No.li!o~ E~arded mCSSl&C ....-----..
Fl'W?_; a..x-M
To; ~ Sluu Nlitiunal <5!d1Yla@hatw0J>
cc:-
Datc: Sun. 25°N&vis
kl(cyl.m'IQ
Dear~
E1ldMed is a coP,Y oftbe~·ofthe&ard l'.i~bfHelveda:Ucfzi\~JPtCtt­
Cammiler DfPoolic At:COO!ttl ahawl1tl};,lt\e 'D!nmtor Mr., L1Qt4:Gi0rge.
. Mr, George. wu~ attomey wile> inwrp~tt:d,ofHtM!tQ.. His plane;numbcds 2 JO
4ll1'~1. if ``@lf!tUr1het al'~.
Plea. `` ••Y" !!J!.,..,-.. .u
~ ··· ··if.you ............._'iliiMI...;,. · .-...11 .im.;;.w-wl!ed·W!
•JU et me.M;l!I ·- .. can dose.
If l wi be of UJY .furlber-~.PJeR contact me.
11\lnkyou ~ muds
·~:.
. ..
.
if~if;;j f 1'I~dt~I:~ if; f.- ~ 1
ih . j ·, 1'•
..·'~i .,. ``-1.
;. . . . I· . ..lll; .~I_
Ii .'
i_ r·r_ r· t~ ~111 - ·, .· ·r · •
· rf .I- ·" :f..;l_ i I
l'il: ~-· 1 ii.~
.
'.I 1, :l
;;>-: •. . ..
8
. . .. ~ .
!
a-I 11 1 .,..i. I !-!"'11
.f-. ~. 1· ~ ~- I . a,
. ·. ·S;:a .
,;,_·J_
.~ ... :. ....: . : .· . "·; .. ...
> ..
1~·1:i~-
'.· . ;, -~• ·i
j.1· ~.-.·..: .!_~ .~.· e:·.t:f1i·:f·~. ·.2~
·.·~ i·
. .. ! . p ·• .
.. .•.cu;. ·"'· ,. . .
rif.,...'
'g . . :: :Bi
!ii'·
.Jl'..·i:·.1.ee
. ; ,,..
..i ·r·
, .i;. ..i ~- ;·1·!.1:·
Ii! .!f; ·. ·,. _,,_.
.~ ..··;·'F :1·: ;I -~ -~ ff kl. ·, .~ ,,.§.· o.,....~" '. ' .... .·.a
'·1· .
ik 1f_t1! fiUi i ·t ~ltl tl IHI: .·
w; !!!.
1 1
s.
. ·· ~:_·
t r~,,.·
·i:; ~.... ~-·
~ .., ·
: :r· ·i'·i ~
I.
> ~ .. I 11' I ..
:f ·.r:i·_·~: · ~"-l -~
[~f I_.(, ·f::·~.· ,-1 ·~
I · . ,. .,.., . ·
lf .• jyjlf · I e
H1~! .
~
-
1ltfl iJUI l ftt j~···
·i ~4
1``
1 ``m
~ ~
·i!J
9
I'.
'I
MINUIEMK``Q``B:l.COlUJiB.
tl.•Sec.etuy.1ulimttteilto1ha~i!w:C01J)Dtate1a:ottUiaakfur~of1k
``emi·nccmia. JJpoa~dtdy sudt,·~ lnd·mrlcd. itwu
· d.$OLV;t.D, ``;``'.mconl book is~•'the``lq~ftbci
-~ Qllfiµ1ha:, '
RtSOLV:U. tbltthc:lkmincAOBpomiartfl'llkllli%i·~·~:i@idi'in
the. ``~
· · · ~. . 1.u.i...1.:..-but.not
``-~ .. • orcertl£ed-oae•
• • · , . •.. :...1 t10 PJOS.
. tn~._~WJr.u-S. · of.the
B~·``'tl,l'riainil``•mcni:llr~'Ji~ QI ~-~odpOiit-of
Fi-·~-~.r``·· •~-~f~ofshmholifa:s anddiRctots, imd
writtm~d~'--4~. . .
omciaUI
'1lic Cminnan of the ndiDllhcn calW for 1hc dccliun of oftiQc:rs 1>f 1hc BusiDac Cmpimldoa.
1
~ :tbHowmgpmons WB•nomiJJl!:ed.1Q'lbe .office ~tq'.dldi: narne;
NIUilf
K«lblthB. M~
~B.Moet,e~·
'.k~'E. Moere '
Nc,.fiatl:as.iommattmui being madi! thencxnim.ti.om wm; eloled aod tbe·clilecfora ~to
"'*on tili nomhaf:Cs. The Cbliimao 8rrAoutad that the ~nominees wme elec:md to tbe
~$Ctbd"•thelti~ Dlin*·to MWI 0:aich1Ube~of.ta Board of.Directors
``10"1Htmni:Oitny'\Ytitttilt. .ployment~·.eaentea by1hc Businm
~un a8d taiospciCCl~o~
``:CD.TD'JCA.TES
'tl»S~tu1omittm``~f'.~lhuecenif``-~··u·~
corpc;nre cortif1caae far ...... Upon mo~9n"dUlyn,.ide, ~-~·camtd, ttw
USOL_
......·. . .m;,n..: ..........,-"'."" of..t.c
,~,~ that-~ -``... "'-~'"'.Kiiitc ~tomcctu~fPl.....y
ym;;_...~ oecatcKt · • · , ~-to
.....
l'epl"""·lb:ail~.·
'Sbiita Ofibe:~'Osponliun;·d1ahoy issmlcl tlceQftbC.~bt'tic:-J~
Upan mm:londilly made; ~ a:I wria. ttwu
RESOLVDJ lbll:UDJ,4'.~ill!li;iif.d\n:m·~ Ind dfiflmr cifthe ~
~.mUtllit~.,_.~.
lbe~e.stea~·~'
. '' ,.,. . ·· ·· m
'WU8D)' :rwtm:·~ oomcbefG:t the Dirticto?&at tt:U
~ mi!'ftiirlH1'Jns no~. the ftWting wu~
DATE: Aijjjt
--·
11:',)007;
'·.
·wJJVU.GJ·NOTIQ·ANDCONSIM
' :usoLVJW. um:``j;``~e sci~ mea1~e(c#,~ LDilial.lMld «'
Dbecrtth
, . . . Qflfe~. Alli!itcu-,;;...._,
. 1~6 .~.:.,&J..- n. • ..:--if".I``.
· ,,...~........ _.
=--~-J•,IU'iOr.-ii.oURD!PUWllO_.J"N:,..VBl...,...._11,u.
FDmLl.tion.fi.lcdwith~S~ofS~·~tt't~"-v~tila~ottlw::
OraaJ~1>f~"£,l~1 ·d·by~j$ieaol.Wian., di*~Wlivc·DOtfetDflbe
time IDd pl•- -. • - : • I •I I '. ' '. ~ '1. ·1:. l .··~,1~ 1 ") .,..,
• '. ~ ... • • . j 1 .....
Pip 1 vfl
~ •.
* .
0.ilicets'.and DiredOrS
1
HF.Lvh'nA ASsEtU .1...wnaida!nl,-
'l.rpon ~- dl:ii:y ..ao; ~ens UrriCd..-i111i,f~l~w.tn1 MRI. OIO.:Moel diKIOtOr1I ~ Gtnoai;
"> tcpl...,.. tlic.``·~iiie_.: JOc' OM:' r`` yinv;
.-....
•L .. .. ___ > . J. _ ..- J. .A- J.. J.. Ii' .f"· . ):n" 4 b ~:o· Q_ _J J .A n . . -b --- .
LU_~-`` M.~:~;A~k-~Jh``
'.l"htre ~t$. ~'``1f~i~ ~- ~·'~ns. ~ mO'lionckllll' ~-
.,.,``.Cl..~ mudy ClllYrii:d. .h wiut 4dio~.
...._
-----,"S
"'"' 1tf ~ (j
----- P.orward(d in~_.___
nacb•.rtbob ..qy'~im•iJ-~>
f«n1;
0 . Prl, S~20~201Ht ll:.13AM ,
Subjcct: ~inures ofl~:N!eet1111 Clflli: Shaft.'noJd~. of!'§t,.tlla ./15~ ;t.~ery lno.
To:.Bim:.Kahn . . .-. - .
. , f'ICUC nno anacnea-~ Mtnuu:s{lcfthenxD'IOfwmwe.t1JJ'.busine&1 rtcar.ds, pa)'J"Oll rcc:ords. i RS fllinp
or
and retumSt 11 woiJ;``atiy comracts oi:ber miieiia`` r.):He.lvetia. Y® .mun also ~dcr 1oi new ·
management a!Lliari.k aooount5 lmd·prOYideJ comJi-~!l'C!)Jl1tin& for a!hecei:1:11SWld dlsburscmc:nisup 10 d•.
l'hank )'OU,
Robert Ripley
Praidc:111
HeJvma Mset tlC®~·fDC.
,. I
,.ill_.!
~ I
J }
l
.t l,~ I
EXHIBJT"G' l-· _ --
•
~··-am·t &Ux%tLOr'1 aocx.tU>T:1·_11W~\ftor4.~'wr!.
Bi.Oct 9toT 5:uuq.,~.m"(,~lJ~9 l.DT a.'~ffilr 9. Btock 91.0T H,,
~i'Lql'lL •!S'li.ar.1i.l!U'.:lcx HDT l3. Bl..OCX9IDr1.c 1 111.DCX;'.9'.UJf'.15
,·'.Bl.OCS::H:OT If, BU'IC& SI LOT fl.. Bl.OCK 9 LOT l ' ; IW)(X·9 00('19 ,lED.'9 tor
lV_,"BµJCK.,tor:il,m.oc::;K.'LQ(.~,.:,B~.9WT.~:.:1!1':DCX9$.``~'9
t»T». 8Loat9 LOT~····~,•``-.o owns the real property described
in the six (6) Warranty Deeds with Vendor's Lien attached hereto and made a part hereof by
reference as Exhibits A. B. C. D. E & F. See attached Exhibit 1. Affidavit of BURTON KAHN.
President of HELVE TIA ASSET RECOVERY, INC., and Exhibits A, B, C, D, E & F.
II.
On September 18, 2013, in the exercise of the county clerk's official duties as County Clerk
of.Bexar County. Texas, the county clerk received and filed three Warranty Deeds with Vendor's
Lien ana recorded tbe a.t-o -wa:t not chane;cd by the IIBLVBTIA ASSET R.TICOVBRY, INO over tho
weekend ofAugust 17, 2007.
"7. .. . The fraudulent Stock Certificate pwports to bear the signature ofKenneth E. Moore
as President and Secretary. Known documents bearing Kenneth Moore's signature were sent to
Mr. Curtis Baggett, a document examiner and expert witness, to compare to the signatures of
3
~· . . .: .
Kenneth E. M~re :on the fraudulent Stock Transfer Certificate. Attached as Exhibit M and made
. . . !
a part hereof by referenccjs Mr. Baggett's report concluding that Mr. Moore's signature is forgery a
;.· .
on the fraudhlent Certificate identified as Exhibit J, including both signatures on the certificate as
president and secretary on the fraudulent Certificate, identified as Q-1 in Ml'.· Baggett' s report. Mr.
Baggett' s qwtlifications are also attached to Exhibit M.
"8. .further, the Organiz.ational Minutes otHELVET!AA:SSET .llliC..:UV bK y' INC..:, page
3, (Exhibit L) 'reads in part: "Resolved that the Business Corporation issuing shares of Business
Corporation•s authorized shares of common stock (no par value) for price of $1.00 each ....
Cu.uijill~wliun 1,;w;h." R~olv...mmonl;r known t>~ 3?30 011~11 W"Y• ConYPr~.-, Tv>n•I Wo.u"rtrf Dc.ed wl\1-. i'/~'.lds-1'n " ,..,i..,~1...ig..d l:,,.f1>•• mo
o · IZ,'2013 ,20Ja,byRobertR1 ,P fandon behalf of HELVETIA
ASSET RECOVERY, INC.
----~-
·a·,r..o i!®l AIMNlli\GIBSONTIOMORe
·~ ,..::_.A; Notary Pii!JV~
• ~'' STATEOFTEXAS
· f)] "rq~t1t1111.l•MlltJIZOt4
-~-~ ........ ...........................
~....,
'.'it '.Hi.'
AFTBR RECORDlNO RETURN TO: :i..
2 ' '
.CERTIFICATE
Thr pDge 10 which this c•r11flcntc I• Dm~•d 111 ny h••·r bo•n nllercd lo r<0duT.f:.D~. _ _ _ _ _.......,_
GERAnD C. RJCKHOFF
COUNTY CLERK
DEKAR COUNTY, TEXAS
DY;~·
11>1.3\ .~ d
Dc11uty Dole
' ' ~= '
Dae# 20130199236
#Pages 3
09/23/2013 11:27AM
e-Filed &. e-Re<;ordeu In U1e
Official ?ublic Records of
BEXAR COUNTY
GERARD C. R!CKHOFF
COUNTY CLERK
Fees$20.00
STATE OFTEXAS
COUNTY OF BEXAR
This is to Certify that this document
was e·FllED and e-RECORDED in the Official
Public Records of Bexar County, Texa$
on thi$ "c been 1lfcrcd lo rcdac:tco11Rdenrtol pol'50nol Jnronnallon bul
Is olbon1·lso n ruil, lruc ~nd corrccl copy orlhe (lrfglnol on nit nnd orr.cord In my office.
Arn:.sTtD:.____==--
GEMRD C RICKHOFF
COUNTY CLERK
BEXAR COUNn', Tl!XAS
Jo,3\.13
Deputy Dale
...
Gerard Rickhoff
COUNTY CLERK
•
BEXAR COUNTY COURTHOUSE
100 DOLOA.OSA, SUITE 104
SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 78205
BEXAR COUNTY
CERTIFICATE
STATE OF TEXAS§
COUNTY OF BEXAR§
I, GERARD RICKHOFF, COUNTY CLERK OF BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS, DO HEREBY
CERTIFY THAT THE FOREGOING ISA TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE OFFICIAL
PUBLIC RECORDS OF REAL PROPERTY OF BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS, NOW IN MY
LAWFUL CUSTODY AND POSSESSION AS SAME APPEARS OF RECORD FILED IN:
VOLUME f ~ -'O 5 tf PAGE ~ li),f)
. THIS COPY MAY HAVE BEEN ALTERED TO REDACT CONFIDENTIAL PERSONAL
INFORMATION AS REQUIRED BY TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE 552.147.
JN TESTIMONY WHEREOF~ WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL OF OFFICE
GIVEN IN THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO, BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS, ON TIDS 31.st
DAY OF O~+<>hft'- A.D., 20 =.t-=:3'----___;
. ·.
GERARD RICKHOFF
COUNTI:" CLERK
BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS
ANY PROVISION HEREIN wmce RESTRICTS THE SALE, RENTAL; OR USE OF THE
DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY BECAUSE OF RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, SEX, HANDICAP,
FAMILIAL STATUS OR NATIONAL ORIGIN JS INVALID AND UNENFORCEABLE UNDER
FEDERAL LAW.
Book 16352Page1"838 3pgs Doc#20130198632
WARRA!'ffY DEED WITH YJ!iNDOR'S LIEN
NOT~CE OF CONFIDENTIALITY RIGHTS: IFVOU ARE ANATURAL PERSON, YOU
MAY REMOVE OR STRIKE ANY OR ALL:OF·.THE FOLLOWJNG INFORMATION
F'RO.M ANY INSTRUMENT THAT TRANSFERS AN INTEREST IN REAL PROPERTY
BEFORE IT IS .FILED FOR RECORD JN !-HE PUBLIC RECORDS: YOUR SOCIAL
SECt;JRITY NUMBER OR YOUR DRIVER'S LICENSE NUMBER.
mite: . , 2013
Gral'!tor: HELVETIA ASSET RECOVERY, INC.
Gnn,1or>s Malling Address: 13123 F.eather. ``i?t, ~Ill\ Antonio, Bexar County, Texas, 78233
.......
Grantee: ACSBLDR, lNC dlb/a Stellar H;~es ..
Grantee's Malling Address: 3910 Bogie Wav. Converse. Bexar County. Teirns78!09
Consideration: The Sllll1 ofTEN AND NO/lOD DOLLARS ($10.00) and other 11ood and valuable
consideration to the undersigned in hand paid by Grantee herein named, the receipt of which is
hercby.acknowlcdgedt end the further consideration of the execution and delivery by Grantee of · ·
his/her/their one cenain Promissory Note of even •dale herewith in the principal sum of ONE
HUNDRED TWENTY THOUSAND ONE HUNORED 'FOUR and N0/100 DOLLARS
($120, 104.00) payable lo !he order of PLAJNS C~ITAL BANK as therein provided and bearing
interest at the rates therein specified, and providing'for acceleration of maturity in event of default
and for attorney's fees, the payment cfwhlch note·is secured by the Vendor's Lien herein retained,
and ts aclditionally secured hy a Deed of Trus! of even date herewhh to DAruIBLL G. ADAMS,
Tru.stee.
·: ...
Property (lneluding any Improvements):
.; .LOT 14, BLOCK 7, KEY LARGO s.tJMnvtSION, BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS,
ACCORDING TO MAP OR PLAT THEREOF RECORDBD IN VOLUME 9573,
PAGE(S) 13, DBED AND PLATRECORDS·.OF BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS; also
moi~ (;Qmmonl7 known a~ 3954 Bogie Way, Convcroc, TcxP:> 78109;
Reservations from Rad Exceptions to Conveyance end Warrant)':
· . ·This conveyance is made nnd accep!ed subject lo the following matters, to the ex.lent same
arc lq ~trcct at this time; any am;I all restrlcllons, ~ovcnants, conditions Bl1d casements, If any,
relating to the herein above described property, but only to the ex lent they are still in c!Tcet, shown of
rc~o~d in the herein above mentioned County and State, and lo all 20ning laws, regulations and
ordinance.c of municip2I and/or other govemmental.auilldrities, .ifany, but onl~ to the extent that they
am still in elfeel, relating ICI the herein above described property.
·• '1 ;·: •
J I-/'3 . Exhibit B
ID-Dato
Dopuly
- ....--· ---· ...
'-- ~
,.
..,·. .~. !t.1~;·. t \:
: ~ . . t·;·.l~r·r .
. .·. Grantor, for the consideration and sulU~c~ ,to the reservations from artd exceptions to
conveyance and warranty, grants, sells, and conveys to' Grantee the property, together with all and
singular t!ie rights and appurtenances thereto in any wise belonging; I=
Dcpuly
;' .
".
Doc# 20130198632
# Pages3
0912.012.013 3: 13PM
e-f'il<:S 0.FREALPROPERTY OF BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS, NOW JN MY
LAWFUL CUSTODY AND POSSESSION AS SAME APPEARS OF RECORD FJLED IN:
VOLUME lb 3 5~ PAGF. I«$~
. TIDS COPY MAY HAVE BEEN ALTERED TO REDACT CONFIDENTIAL PERSONAL
INFORMATION AS REQUIRED BY TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE 552.147.
JN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL OF OFFICE
GIVEN JN THE ClTY OF SAN ANTONIO, BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS, ON THIS 31.6± .
DAY OF D~--\-p'b.m.- A.D., 20 z;J.?~--
GERARl> :RlCKllOFF
COUNTY CLtRK
BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS
BY: ~ MCJerk
&..- Dep~unty ~-»1
ANY PROVJSJON HEREIN WHICH RESTRICTS THE SALE, RENTAl,, OR USE OF THE
DESCRlHlW REAL PROPERTY HECAUSE OJI' RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, SEX, HANDICAP,
FAMILIAL STATUS OR NATIONAL ORIGIN IS INVALID AND UNENFORCEABLE UNDER
FEDERAL LAW.
\
Book 16352Page 16103pgs Doe# 20i3019&589
I. ti
. \. WA.KKANTY DEl!:U WITH Yt;NUUK'.S LJ.l'.iN
NOTICE OF CONFIOENTIALlTY RJGIITS: IF YOU ARE ANATURAL PERSON, YOU
MAY REMOVE OR STRIKE ANY OR ALL OFT.HE FOLLOWING INFORMATION
F,ROM ANY INSTRUMENT THAT TRANS``~S AN INTEREST IN REAL PROPERTY
BEFORE JT IS FILED FOR RECORD IN TIIE PUBLIC RECORDS: YOUR SOCIAL
SECURITY NUMBER OR YOUR DRIVER'S LICENSE NUMBER.
Date: ~W 148, , 2013
Grantor: HELVETIA ASSET RECOVERY, INC.
... , Mailing AddreHl 13123 Fea1her Point. San Antonio. Bexar County, Texa:1: 781)3
Grantor's
Grantee: ACSBLDR, INC d/b/a Stellar Homes
Grantee's Mailing Address: 3910 Bogie Way, Converse. Bexar County, Tex!lll 78109
Consideration: The sum ofTEN ANO NO/I 00 DOLLARS ($10.00) and other good and valuable
consi~cration to the undersigned 'in hand paid by Grantee herein named, the receipt of which is
hereby acknowledged; and the further consideration oflhc execution and doll very by Grantee of
his/her/their one ceraiin Promissory Nbte .or ev~11lil&ie here\vith In the principal sum of ONE
HUNDIIBD EIOHTV-~TOHT TIIOUSA NJ)' and iJdftlfla DOLLARS (S 188.000.00) payable to the
order of PLAINS CAPITAL BANK as tberein,.p``idce ana tearing interest at the rates therein
spci;ified, nnd providing for acceleration offuaturiiy'in event of default llJld for attorney's fees, the
payment of which note is secured by ihc Vendor's Lien herein relained, lllld isaddltlonally secured
~y ":Dod. .,fT'l'UCt ,,r ovon d..to h•r,.with to DAP.RE:Lt. Q. ADAM~, Truct.•.
Property (including any Improvements):
~: .;·:
:~ .. LOT 22, DLOCK 9, J<.m' Lr'ill.00 SUDDIVIStON, omu.n COUNTY, 'l"OXAS,
ACCORDING TO MAP OR PLAT THEREOF. RECORD8l) IN VOLUME 9573,
PAGE(S) 13, DEED AND PLAT RECORDS OF BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS; also
more commonly known as 395 I Bogie Way~ Converse, TX 78109:
Reservations from and E11ccptlons to Conveyance and W11rranty:
: ·This conveyance is made and aeccplcd subject to !he following matters, to the extent same
11re In .effect at this time; any and all restrictions, covenants, conditions and casements, if any,
rel~ti11g to 1he herein above described property, but only 10 the extent they arc still Jn effect, shown of
record in the herein above mentioned County and State, and to all zoning laws, regulations and
ordinances of mlll\icipal andi'or other g(jv.emn1tntill autlitllities, ifany, but only 10 the extent that they
are st1!1 in effect, relating to the herein above' des'crib'edipropeny.
.. ,\.:l.····
· Grantor for the considerati6n and subjeet to the reservations from and exceptions to
conveyance my omt.,,
:ATTESTED:_--=........,,..,....--
`` C. RICKUOFF
COU1'TY CLERK
D£.XAR COUNn', TEXAS
BY: ..)-./ JD·{)/. /3 Exhibit c
Deputy Dntt
'------ ·-·--·-- --··-- ·-- . -- -:--··
\
..
:;
singular !he rights and appurtenances thereto in an~·wi~e belonging, to have and hold it to Grantee,
Grantee's heirs, eKccutors, administrators, successors, or assigns forever. Grantor hereby binds
Granier and Grantor's heirs, executors, administrators, and successors to warrant and forever defend
all and singtdar lhe property to Grantee and Granlec's heirs, executors, adminlstre(ors, successors,
and assigns, agaimt every person whomsoever lawfully claiming or to claim the same or any part
thereof, except as to the mervations from and ~x~eptions to WM"anty.
. It is expressly agreed that the ~NDOR'S~JJ;:N, os well as 1hcSuperiorTitlc in and to the
nbovi;: de11nrihed premi~es, fa rettihi'~ ~lti~i 1 :ii.fi.~·li1io.,,~ described pr C. RIC:KHOFF
COUl\'TI' CLERK
nµAR COUN1-Y, TEXAS
. nv~:...;· ...· -=-=-------- 10 ...3[.J~
: • .,:, nrpuiy Dalt
\
. ·~· ..
..
Doc# 20130198589
#Pages3
09/20/2013 2:54PM
e-Filod & c-Rccordcd in the
Official PubHc Records of
BEXAR COUNTY
GERARD C. RICKHOFF
COUNTY CL.ERK
F~s$20.00
STATE OF Tl::XAS
GOUNTY OF 61iXAR
Thfi; is lo Certify that this document
was e-Fl~ED and e-RECORDED in the Officlal
Publfe Records of Bexar County, Texat.
on this date and time stamped thereon.
09/20/2013 2:54PM
COUNTY CLERK, BEXAR COUNTY TEXAS
CERTIFICATE
Tilt pngc lo wl1lch this ecnlf1C11le Is offi1cd n1ny hn,·c llw1 nlltrcd fl> l'tdncl Cohfldtntlnl p 1'&.
THIS CO'.PY MAY HAVE BEEN ALTERED TO REDACT CONFIDENTIAL PERSONAL
JNFORMATION AS REQUIRED BY TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE 552.147.
lN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFJCJAL SEAL OF OFFICE
GIVEN IN THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO, BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS, ON THJS .3 irl-
DAY OF De.~bQL. . A.U., :ZO .L~. •
GERARD RICKHOFF
COUNTY CLERK
BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS
``=.:.=~r.Ju..,..~__i,,;,M~©-J)~a
BY:
Dep~nty Clerk 1 i--
ANY PROVISION HERElN WHICH RESTRICTS THE SALE, RENTAL. OR USE OF THE
DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY BECAUSE OF RACE, COLOR, REL1GION, SEX, HANDICAP,
FAMILIAL S'l'ATUS OR NATIONAL ORIGIN IS INVALID AND UNENFORCEABLE UNDER
FEDERAL LA'Y!
Book 16411 Page 718 3pgs Doe# 20130225299
First American Title l
Gf# ~"'kQfr~ ·
~.nC'iot.;ONFIDENTIALITY RlGHTS: IF YOU AREA NATURAL PERSON, YOU
MA,f JttMOVE OR S'r~ll(E ANY OR ALL OF rim FOLLOWJNG lNFORi'fATION
FR.OM ANY INSTRUMENT THAT TRANSFERS AN JNT.EREST IN REAi, PROPER'l'Y
B:.t:FORt JT JS .FU.ti> FO.R RtCOR.l> J.N TB'.E PU.BLlC Rl:CORDS: YO\'JR socm:.
SECURITY NUMBER OR YOUR DRIVER'S LICENSE NUMBER•
.' '
FATCO·S~ WARRANTY DEED WITH VENDOR'S LIEN
Oc1oberZ.~2013
·Gratitorr HELVETIA ASSET RECOVERY, INC.
'
. l.
Griuitor's Mailing Address:
-~-m33
Grantee: ACSBLOR, .INC. db.1 STBl.LAR HOMES
o_.ant4CiJ4 }'..f,..il:ng Acfdrc»I
~l``Way
Coiwcrs~, Tcxa$ 78 !09
Hex;ir CounlY
Co11sidcrntion: C:ish aud a note ofeven date c.~ccu1cd by Gmn!Ql and pay.iblc to the otdcrofBROADYWAY
~A;i'IONAL BANK in the principal Amount of ONE HUNDRED TWEN7Y SlX 'JiiOUSAND FOUR
lil).NDRED ANIJ OU/.IOOTiiS DOLLARS ($126,400.00) which represen1spart paymentofthopurclw.c price
Tlwnotcis sceu~b}•a first and superior vendor's lion and supcriortttlcrctained in this clt'.:4
1•1y Date
·- .. -· ·- ·- -
' ..
forever dcforul all and singular the Pro`` ta Grantee and Gra11t~s heirs, su~rs. and assign~ ag1insl
every person wuoms~r 1awruuy c1aimins e>r 10 c1a1m 1n~ same or any p'111 1ncroor; except as 10 111~
Rc!iOl\l:llioll.!I from Comiey:tnce and tho R.~cepliom to Conveya11te and Wnnanty.
Tho vendor's Ue11 agairu1 and supcriorlitlete> the Propony~re retained until oacll note described is fully
p111id ('Otorropcnytl1a1 iscvidc11ced by lhcnotc. The first and superior vendor's Jienapist end
C11J\'!pnr 1il!e In the Prnpezty nrA rel2it!M fni lllo benefit ofRROAOYWAY NATIONAL BANX and arc
1~f~r1ed lo BROADYWAY NATIONAL BANK without recourse against Oranror.
Whon the context requires, slnp,ular noons and pronouns include tho plur:il.
STATE OFTEXAS ·
COUNTY OF BBXAR
------:"- ~GlllSONTIDMO!!E .
a
Notti, l'IJlllc
STATEOFTEX~
MrCollm. f111.1111212D14
" ~·"
.. ~:;;:;;....;,:;;;;,;;:,;;;;:m,:;~;..;.;...11
(~ .
AFTER RECORDING RETURN TOi
ACS:Sl.DR, JNC. dbA STELL~OMES
66~4 ~SoadxWlly31JC fDltJ(
Conytt.t'l'0 1 T~xu,ilCIP
WARRANTY DEED Wi11l VENDOR'S LIEN
PAOIHOF2
CERTIFICATE
Tho p11gc to which this certtncolols affixed nony hDvt been Dltrred to ,..dnd conHd•r>tfal personal lnformnllon but
is olbcrwisr o r..11, true nnd correct copy or !hr originnl on file ond or record In h•)' offi«,
ATT~Tl1D•
GERARD c.'"m=cKH=,_,o....F"li'--
COUNTv CLERK
BEXAR COU.Nyj•'}f-XAS
DVi L(':J I /-q-rJ
Drpuly Dnte
.,......
Doc# 20130225299
#Pages 3
10/30/2013 2:35PM
"'-l=il<>d R. o-Fl..,,,ordod in lh<>
Official Public Records of
BEXAR COUNTY
GERARD C. RICKHOFF
COIJfllTV Cl FRK
Fees$2o.oo
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF 6EXAR
This is lo Certify that this document
was e-FILED and e-RECORDED In the Official
Public Records of Bexar County, Texas
>)fl thl~ dole and limo; ~!otllj.l<:J lhcr<:i;in,
10/30/2013 2:35PM
COUNTY CLERK, BEXAR COUNTY TEXAS
CERTI.FlCAl'E
Th• pag• to which thl• ccrtlnt11tt Is o!IDcod may hnv~ brcn "ltcn:d t<> redact confidentlal personal inronuollon but
l• olh~nli~e a full, !rue 1111d torrtcl copy orlhf orfglnnl on Olr and af reeord in my office.
ATTJ;.ST.ED1 _ _ _ __
GERARD C. RICKHOFF
COUNTY CLERK
BEXAR COUNTJ.iTIJXAS
B\': _ _,_;lr;;.....~SJ.,,.______ /I- t..f-r_j
Dc-puty Dale
Gerard Rickhoff
COUNTY CLERK • BEXAR COUNTY
BEXAR COUNTY COURTHOUSE
100 DOLOROSA, SUITE 104
SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 78205
CERTIFICATE
STATE OF TEXAS§
COUNTY OF BEXAR§
I, GERARD RlCKHOFF, COUNTY CLERK OF BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS, DO HEREBY
CERTIFY THAT THE FOREGOING IS ATRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE OFFICIAL
PUBLIC RECORDS OF REAL PROPERTY OF BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS, NOW IN MY
LAWFUL CUSTODY AND POSSESSION AS SAME APPEARS OF RECORD FILED JN:
VOLUME J&,4 l I PAGE Q- L8:
"'l'HJS COPY MAY HAVE BEEN ALTERED TO REDACT CONFIDENTIAL PERSONAL
INFORMATION AS REQUIRED BY TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE 552.147.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL QI; QFFJCE
GJVEN IN T~ITY QFSAN ANTONIO, BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS, ON THIS 4(1<
»AY oF [Jjfj_Ye m !:&c. A.D., 20 I2 .
GERARD RICKHOFF
COUNTY CLERK
BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS
nv: - '-'a~ ~e~pu~ty-c-ou-1~- - 'er" "'~. L. .<. >C12c~ .=L.-
ANY PROVISION HEREIN WHICH RESTRICTS T.HE SALE, RRNTAL, OR USE OF THE
DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY BECAUSE OF RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, Sl!:X, HANDICAP,
FAMILJAL STATUS OR NATIONAL ORIGIN IS INVALID AND UNENFORCEABLE UNDER
FEDERAL LAW•.
,Book 16411 Page·732 3pgs . Doc# 20130225301
r11:;r iVTit5i~on Tiile .
GF# \ Cft.cB33rrATCO-SA
$ ~ .
. J\TOTIC~ OF CONFJDENTIAt.nv rue.ins, IFVOU All.EA NATtmA.t.l'lmSON, \'OU
MAY ~MOVE OR STRIKE ANY OR ALL OF THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION
FROM ANY INSTRUMENT THAT TRANSFERS AN INTER.EST IN REAL PROPERTY
BEFORE IT IS FlLED FOR RECORD IN TIIE l'lJBLlC RECORDS: YOUR SOClAL
SECUl.U'l"ll ?-TUMllJ:n on 'iO\JJ.\ DIUVEn·s LlCENGl'HWMlnm. .
WARRANTY DEED WIIB VENDOR'S LIEN
!Jate: uctoller~ ZUIJ
•,
Grantor: HBLVfil1A ASSET R.ECOVERV, INC.
Gr~titvT'> Mnl\11111 tularcn;
Gr~11tee:
-~ACSBLDR, INC. dba STELLAR HOMES
Grantet's Mailin2 Address:
.·. ~o~
4 Wny
Converse, Texas 78109
BcXllr County
~o~sider~tion: Cash and a note ofeven date c.~ceuted by Grantee arid pnyabl~to tlt~ordcrofBROADY\VA Y
· NATIONAL BANK in the principal amouni of ONE HUNDRED FOR.TY 1WO THOUSAND FOUR
HUNDR.EDANDOO/JOOTHSDOLLARS(Sl42,400.00}whichrcpmentspaltpa}mcntof~purchascpri~
. +£"th. -pfC.~rty, ilw, ``W \D KWrM. lty C'o fu.ot llni 'l'IJ)Mf~t ..,C.ndcu1Q- L\'IJC'a Aftd. a.~po-nO'I' tiU. n.toiftcd. \~ i.hi:s d,...d,
in mvorofBROADYWAY NATIONAL BANK lllld bya firsl·lien deed oftrvstof evcndateftomGrantcelo
D'LAYNE RHYNSBURGER, Trusteo.
Pro11crtY Ontludinf. any imi>rovemtnls):
LOT 52, BLOCK 7, .KEY LARGO SUBDMSION, DEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS, ACCORDiNG TO MAP
OR PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 9513, PAGE(S) 13, DEED AND PLAT RECORDS OF
BEXAR COUN1Y, TEXAS.
Resnv~!ions rrom and Emptions ti) Conveynnce nnd Warranty:
Validly CKisting casements, riS)lls-of·way, and prc.miptiw rigllls, whether of r~rd or not; all
pt•.e.n1ly raeotdtd ~ftd '':tlicll~ •nios.:",g R-tetnm~itnt11, ~tho,1h~ oon~•i;uJ:t!Ov ol°th• C!\ir·H.o.ei f'H o``ta, thstG.A'"~t
tbc Proimty; and ta."tionsto
. Conveyance and Warr;mly, grants, sdls, nnd canvcysloGran!~the i>iqierfy, l<>gctherwith all and singulaiihe
rishtnnd ~pp11nenances 1hc1CT0 in any way belonging, to bave and to hold it to Grantee !llld Gfl!lllce's heirs,
successor$, and assigns forever. Oranror binds Grantor and Grantor's heirs and su=sso~ lo warrant and
WARRANN OEED WlT.H V£ND0R'S L!EW
l"l\OJ: 1 or i.
CERTIFICATE
Th• pag• to which this «rtlflcat~ Is affiXtd m~y have b••n Olt•red to l'iy !"'""' wh"'"'"' la.wtullr c;blmlng or lo ~lo.Im ~ sant; or ~ny pan lhcrwr, o;,;o;p1 "' 10 th•
ReSer\lali~ frnm Co1111ey:mce and the Eicceptio!1$ IO Conveyance Md Warrt1nty,
·. · The ~dor'$ Iicn against and superior title to the Properly •re TClalned un1il cacb notcde$C:tl"bcd is fully
p~id 11ourdi119 lb it< IOl'llU, 61 whi•ll bll'l6 thi• deed wlll l.eoom• ftboolute.
BROADYWAYNATIONALBANK,etGran1c.G'srr.qu=t,haspaidincoshtoG11111onhatponionof
lhepur`` priccoflhoPropcrtylhat ~ C\'id~ by thcllOfc. The lim 1111d supt;riorYGlldor'~ limapimtand
siipmor title lo the Ptopcrty arc tttainr.d ror the bClle.lit cfBR.OADYWAV NATIONAL BANK and ~re
1mnsferred te> Bl1.0ADYWAY NATIONAL BANK without !'CCCIII~ asninst Granto:.
~n !he con1cx1 requires, sinsular noun$ and pronouns include tho plum!. ·
"L·
11$:
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNiY Oil f.lCXAR
AFTER RECORDJNC RETURN TO:
ACSBLOR, INC. dba STEL````~, l..
UJ.dKc1•SQ111blllay~/() ~\
CunviorK, Tcxu 7810~
wAJW.i.m' DEED WITH VENDOR'S LIEN
J>AGR201't
CE~ruiCATE
Tho paco 10 which this crrtlRc:itr ls affix..t moy hn"e b<rth• <>rlglnol on Ill• ond <>f rctorll In my officr.
ATTFSTED: _ _``­
GERAlID C RlClCl'!OFF
COUNTI' CLERK
JlExAR <:OVNTY, TEXAS
B\': ~ JI- t/-t:J
~u!y ' Datr
Doc# 20130225301
#Pages 3
1013012013 2:35PM
e•Fited & e-Recorded in the
Official Public Reeords of
BEXAR COUNTY
GERARD C. RICKHOFF
COUNTY CLERK
Fees$20.00
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF DEXAR
Tliis is lo Certify that this document
was e-FILEO and e-RECORDED In lhe Official
Public Records of Bexar Countv. Texas
on this dale and time .sfampcd !hereon.
10130/2013 2:35PM
COUNTY CLERK, BEXAR COUNlY TEXA$
CERTIFlCAT£
Tiie pngr Co which this tt111Rcnte ls llffittd moy hll\'f hem ollmd to redact conRdtntfal pe!'lonnl fnfonnaflon but
Is olhtrniSt' n full, tn.10 nnd ~nrttol copy of lh• orlglnnl on nl• nnd ~f ...cord In m)' om...
A1i.ESTED:._ _ _ __
GERAJU> C, RJCJ):·
tc:_'2_
TEXAS
Deputy
' .
Gerard Rickhoff
COUNTY CLERK BEXAR COUNTY
BEXAR COUNTY COURTHOUSE
100 DOLOROSA. SUITE 104
SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 78205
.- .
"· CERTIFICATE
STATE OF TEXAS§
COUNTY OF BEXAR§ .
I, GERARD RICKHOFF, COUNTYCLERKOF BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS, DO HEREBY
CERTIFY THAT THE FOREGOING ISA TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE OFFICIAL
PUBLIC RECORDS OF REAL PROPERTY OF BEXAR COUNTY. TEXAS. NOW IN MY
LAWFUL CUSTODY AND POSSESSION AS SAME APPEARS OF RECORD FILED IN:
VOLUME Ila r..111 PAGE 1. ):)
THIS.COPY MAY HAVE BEEN ALTERED TO REDACT CONFIDENTIAL PERSONAL
INFORMATION AS REQUIRED BY TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE 552.147.
_ IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL qi}5>!FlCE
GlVEN 1N THE~TY OF SAN ANTONIO, BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS, ON THIS ~ -
DAV OF -i
tJ/1lk{J.,tJljb()r A.D., 20 /3 . •
GERARD RICKHOFF
1r"'"'1HfltJ1'
•• -•' ·- ti,,-<,. COUNTY CLERK
,«' ·;.~ 1. 0 1,,,
. r~··~"). ._..,.9-. ••••.'1 0 /': ~.. BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS
: ," ......
J1'
·-.:``;..\
:
/ .·o-·...•
• J
• <> ~
~·~:
-.·~i:
~
'5 -?
9'~.
. ,I`` ~
-
:·n~
•
~;: '3. ;.: -·
':-
'j; ,.J. • I ,......_ .:
~ ~ .....
./... ••
: r'
. ··... ...•..
":-;-,,,:~{,,.,. . - ... "·i~
..--., ,~
,,
:./')....
';,, 1r, ·S ·~. \,\.'' .
'1,~ "'·
I l,11 111 \I\\
\\~' ., . . .
ANY PROVISION HEREIN WIDCH RESTRICTS THE SALE, RENTAL, OR USE OF THE
Ut;~t:lUl:UMJ REAL l"KOYJl.ilff:Y BECAU:Sl!i OF RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, :5l!'tX, HANDJCAr,
FAMILIAL STATUS OR NATIONAL ORIGIN IS INVALID AND lJNENFORCEABLE UNDER
FEDERAL LAW.
.. '· Book 16411 Page 786 3pgs Doc# 20'!30225306
First American Title
GF# 12>~oa'11- ~FATco-sA
$ NOTICE OF CONFJDENTlALITY RIGHTS: IF YOU ARE A Ni\TURAL PEKSUN, YOU
MAY REMO\I.~ on STRIKE ANY OR. ALt mr Till: F()LLOMNG lN'FORMATION
·FROM ANY .INSTRUMENT 1'HATTMNSFERS AN lN'fEltEST lN REAL PROPERTY
DEFOnE IT 1$ men 'FOR ll\l:COltD JN 'mt PUllUC RECORDS; VOU:R SOC1Al,
SECURITY NUMBER OR YOUR DRIVER'S LICENSE NUMBER.
WARRANTY DEED WITH VENDOR'S LIBN
OctobcrZf. zo l3 •
Grantor: HELVETIAASSETRECOVllRY,INC.
Gr~ntcc: ACS6LDR, INC., a Texas wrpora1ioq
1
C.,.n"too o M4"1:11g Add.-oPPot
. . 8lJO~'t
~a4~Way
Converse, Tox;is 7KI09
llcl!ar Countv
. Coiisidcrntion: cm and II note of even date ~llllUICd by GrllOIC¢ and payablo lo the order ofJEFFERSON
· BAj-1.K in 100 principal nmaunt ofONE HUNDRED TWF.Nli' SBVBN THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED
FORTY AND 00/l OOTHSJ}QLLARS (S 127,440.00) which represents part paymcn1 oflhc purcbascprlce of
111011ropcr1y. ·me note is socurcd tly a11rst aJlCI superior vemlo(s lien ana supcrtortl!I~ rei.11noa in lllisacec tn
favof'of JEFFERSON BANK and by a .first-lien dcoi of Irust of CVcn dato fro1n G!'lllllec tel DANNY B.
BUTLER, irusttc.
LOTS, BLOCK 9, KEY LARGO SUBDlVISJON, BEXAR COUNTY, TEX/IS, ACCORDJNG TO MAP
OR PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLlJM1!957J, PAQP.(S) lJ, DEED AND PLAT RECORDS OF
BEXAR ~OUNT'I'. 'l'EXAS.
Ru,rvRtions rronl ~nd Exceptions to ConveyAnc~ aqd Warr:nlty:
Vo!ldly exiS1ing cascincnls, rlghts.Of·\\'3)', 3ruJ pructiptivc ri~hts, whether of n:eord or not; all
prcscmry rci:oraell a11\I valldlycxl5llng ll1'Ullll1Cn1:<, mh<;r 1han cuuv~1••n1;'" ur1h~ ·~·r•w (l;o .,......., ll•w.nll\M
th~ Property; and ta"cs for 2013, which Grantee assumes and agrees 10 pay, and subsequent assessments for
that and prior ycius due lo chnnac in land usage, ownership, or bolh, Ille pa}'ITIClll ofwhieh Grantee mumcs.
Cl":t.nt~r 1 thr th@ t'tint;~rntion nrtd ruhj~rt tn tfw!. ~P.t'i9n1.Minnr: f'rnn1 ~nH~)r.'n~.I! nnd 1hr. E."(rJ".l\llMt: In
Convey1mcu1111d Wiirflll•ty, gr,1111$, ~ell~, :u1d conveys 100r.11u~ thePropcr1y, wgclllcr with all MdsiJl811Llrthe
rlghis and appurcennnccs thereto in any way belonging, ro h:ivc and to hold ii to Grantee and Grnn1ce's heirs,
sueccxsors, nnd assigns forever. Grnn1or binds Granter and Grantor's bcin and successors 10 1Varram and
WA!lRAN'l'Y DEED WTrn VENDOR'S L1£N '
PAGJl I 01'2
.; ..
...
CEllTpi!CATE
Tlit jJng• to which lhb ccrt10m1• ls nffixed niny hove bctn nllcrcd to rcdllct co11Hdc11trAI pt1'!0onol lnformnllon but
l~ 'nilltrwl•c n Ml, Irut nnd cotccct copy o£thc ortr,lnnl 011 nle 11nd of ~ccord In my olllce,
AITl"..'itf.01_ ___.,.._,..._ _
GERARD C. RICKHOFF
COUNTY cr.imK
BEXAllCOU~T'.TEXAS
.
BY:· ~ Exhibit ·p
uty
''--.- -~-~----···
•. ·~
forever defend all and &inllllar th11 l"rollerll' lo ON DANK
· without rer.o1usc againsl Gnmtor.
·;, When the conlo~I rQq\liTC9, singular nouns and pronouns include Ille plural.
!. .
.....
Us:
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF BEXAR
AF;TER RECORDING RETURN TO:
ACSBLDR1!NC., a Tc.us to``~ ~ 1 \cUJ..
B631JfoSe~tb.Wa.,.M1D~--- ~
--~:r9f~o. T..u, 78109
WM'RANTY l)EF.'OWl'l'fl VENDOR.'$ tlEN
J>ACZ!l Of 7. •
CERTIFICATE
Thf page lo wldch 1hL-; ccrtlRcalC' •~ anb::C!d rnC'l)' h"AV-t beC!n altered lo rC!dnd confkfentlnl personnl lnrormnUon but
i~ oth~nrl'~ 1 full, lruc nnd cnrrcd copy nf lh~ orlglnnl on mi and of r~rd In my offirc.
ATTESTED:..----..,..,..``-
GERARD C. RICKBOFF
]):\'; _____________
COU.N1'YCL£RK
llEXAU COU~NT ',TEXAS
If <../-0
uty 'Dnlr
Doc# 20130225306
#Pages 3
10/3012013 2:36PM
e·Flled & e-Recorded.in the-
Official PubUc Records of
BEXAR COUNTY
GERARD C. RICKHOFF
COUNTY CLl:RK
Fees $20.00
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF BEXAR
This is lo Certify lhat this document
was e·FILED and e-RECOROED in the Offl~lal
Public Records of Beltar County, Texas
on this dale and lime stamped thereon.
10/30/2013 2:36PM
COUNTY CLERK, BEXAR COUNTY TEXAS
CERTlflCATE
Thr pu11t to which this ~uilficn!r ts uffixtd mn)' havt brt11nllmd10 rtdna conOdrnllnl ptrsonnl lnfor111Cltlon but
l,r i0lf,t'rn'bc- n fulJ 1 tru~ ttnd ~tu-red <'Op)-~ (\rtho (\rlglnul an m., 11nd (}rf"O'C't:ird In tn)• 4)ffi~e-.
A'Ji~:STEO:
GERARD c."'RI"':"':CKJ='l~O"'"n:.,----
COUi\'lY CJ.ERK
n~co,r,\' Ti;:XAS
R\': u.5 Deputy
JI- c.;-O
Dute
Gerard Rickhoff
.IH •
£ "'
COUNTY CLERK · · BEXAR COUNTY
BEXAR COUNTY COURTHOUSE
100 DOLOROBA, SUITE 104
SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 78205
CERTIFICATE
STATE OF TEXAS §
COUNTY OF BEXAR§
I, GERARD RICKHOFF, COUNTY CLERK OF BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS, DO HEREBY
CERTIFY THAT THE FOREGOING IS ATRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE OFFICIAL
PUBLIC RECORDS OF REAL PROPERTY OF BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS, NOW JN MY
LAWFUL CUSTODY AND POSSESSION AS SAME APPEARS OF RECORD FILED IN:
VOLUME
! 1 .
Jin L/ I I
'
PAGE'----'2-1--'£..,._...,,&_
THIS CC)PYMAY HAVE BEEN ALTERED TO REDACT CONFIDENTIAL PERSONAL
INFORMATION AS REQUIRED BY TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE 552.147.
JN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIALSEALOf'J~FICE
GIVEN JN THE!!TY OF$AN ANTONIO, BEX,4.R COUNTY, TEXAS, ON THIS !:/I:-
DAY OF &J_Verr7·{2§__ r A.D., 20 t..:L.. •
GERARD RICKHOFF
COUNTY CLERK
BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS
BY:-4-a~nm``1~'1_..~a7~Qv~·ot,~_
Deputy County Clerk
·., .
ANY PROVISION HEREIN WHICH RESTRICTS THE SALE, RENTAL, OR USE OF THE
DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY BECAUSE OF RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, SEX, HANDICAP,
e FAMILIAL STATUS OR NATIONAL ORIGIN IS INVALID AND UNENFORCEABLE UNDER
FEDERAL LA\Y.·
... •,
Corporntions Section John Steen
P.0.Box 13697 SCl.:lC\acy of-State
•
Austin. 'rexas 78711-3697.
Ihe undersign``( as Secreia.ry of State ofTexas1 does hereby certify that the attached is a true and
c.orred copy of.r~i:-h doc11ment on file in thf~ office :1.1: de~cribed below:
·~
Helvetia Asset Recovery, Inc.
Filing Number: 800851624
~r.tificate of Formation August 01, 2007
TUK 'For::foituro h1.15'1ll"I 2~. 200!>
Reinstatement November 02, 2009
~ublic lnformati.on Report (PlR) December 31, 2009
Public Information Report (PlR) December 31. 2010
Public lnformati.on Report (PTR) December 3 t, 2011
Public lnforma'.tion Report (PTR) December 31, 20·12
·Cliange ofRegister.ed Agent/Office September 16, 2013
Coe;1 lifi"'iiLoe; vf A.1111;;111.!w~:al~ i3eptem1Jta 27, 201J
Certificate of Amendment October04, 2013
In testimony whereof, I have hereunto signed my name
officially and caused to be impressed hereon the Seal of
i'.State at my omce in Austin, rex:as on uctooer JU, :.::uu.
~ .
Tnhn St1um
Secretary of State
Come visit us 011 the itttemet at ltftp:llwww.sos.stcrte.tx.us/ .
PhonP.'. (.51 ?.) 463•.'1<;5'5 D'.-..... '"''1\ .1..::::., .r..,nn Di21· 7-1-l £0.r~l~v SeL"t:focM:
Prepared by: SOS·WEB Document: !i l 1S63800002
Exhibit G
.. ..
.
i:``````1=:``::``-~==~:::~:=~=:~·~J ~--···-~···-··~ ·-··-·-·:::·~;···········--·-·--·-··-·"···· ~:::: ::``-~===:~:=~::::~,:~:-~===:~===:~:\
\secretary of State " · ~. I' Filed in the Office of the .
· . Box 13697 . ··
a.:n, TX 78711-3697 : . . !• Secretarv of State of Texas
Filing#: 800851624 08/01/2007 1
l'AX~ 5121463-5709 " r Document#: 180560590002 I
j · ;· Certificate of Formation I Image Generated ~lectronlcally :
!Fi11no Fge: $300
..::..::.;:..::..
:.,.::...~
:. For-Profit Oorpo.-ation
...."... -...-.-..--.........._,_.,........._ . . __
J. .. ____ ....................``~.``~ ~.~'.``!... \:
..- - ._ _ _ _... _...,_..... .....--.....
"::..::,~::..::..::..:;~.:-~..:.~.::.,:.:";-,..t.,::..:.;.- ...._...~ ~ --'lfl. ,_. ._.. ,_. . . . . . .-...
l~eruina1!fai``eina-rormia1s·aSarii-~,!!~-~;Me``!``iy is: t...c,~,---- J~... ·=,,~--~·-``~"~"'~=~.1.·
lHeivetia "ASSefReC:overy, inc:----~---~-------. -----
: •1,
:............................................ ·····-··· ................................... ····~···· ······-····-· ·-··~·············"
·-·----·---·--
:c.-
.... ,....... -··· ............ 1f
1
iThe name m1.1$t c:onleln the wvr11 "'90rporillon," "GOmpany," "lnoorporated," 11mlted," or an abbreY!allop:ot one of these lemt~. The nilme mll1t not
: be the same liS. decepllveiv slmllar lo OI' slmllar to that of an existing corporate, limited llablllty company, or llmlled partl'lflrslllp name on file with I
iU\IQ OC'-rc:ilary . , o\atc. A pre.um1nary"h~k r41'r ttn~mp eYGn111blH•~ f.a l'Goomm.e:ndt;;d. . . . {
o;_lL=·'"~J.LJ.11!1.11 .•..l l.,,.J!~!ll.Bl·.IJ.'11.ilbe!§if@;l~ll·IHliidJJ_li J .....``·~-l,,". JlJLJ. L. U
!I....F:A.
,,. ___ The il'!ltial registered agent Is an organl%etlon (cannot be corporation named above) by IM name ot. ! --------------·-------·---1
I OR
\~e·. Tileitifli91 'reg\$tered agenfisanfudiViduai'"reSidenfofiiieSiatewhose nameTs~setforth "below:--·----·---!
I
i~E~.:````~;,,````!-````~-:````-~-:-~.~-``-::.~:.: ·. :
~-~ ~ ``-``-~-~-~-``-`` ~ -~-:.~.~:-~ -:.: .~_:. ~ ``-~-: ~-~.: .~:,.~ -~ ~.: :.~.~
i~-: !!1:~. ``L~!S``````~.~fJ~J!````. ````..<1..m,~.~P``. ``~.~.``~J``==-=~·~'".,.. . ,..,.~..-· ·......... ·I·
;street Address: ·
:. :. . . :\.
1-.................,.............. ".................. " ..................................... "...................................................................... ·1I
I 1715 HaClbury Lane San Antonio TX 78248
If iiurriller.etdireci<>~'cons1ituuii'Q.itieTii1tiiii-iiaai·crc;1direciarn·aii~ -uho oro to :>erv,o'o::> dlrc.:.toro until \he 1ir:il annual U1¥C\l11~ of ::>h1:1rct11:1~cr:i QI i,iulU \hc-h :.u~u1::> i1t c
.......... t
f
)~!``~-``2::````~ .~.``1,~j````;.~.:...::.::.:.:.::,:..:1.::.::.,-,.::.:;.``::..::.,!:..l:,::."·'"i::.::.:.·~:..::.::.::.::..;:..::..::.:.::.:;..e-".!!.J:.:.",:;.".::..::.~.::.::.::..::..::.!:.;..~.:;.::.;:..;;~.. :l"
j0lrec1or1: L19yd . Ge.9rge [
! .i:..!:.'!.~....~_!.:'w::..!f,.'~ ,:•,.::.I~':,.:'.',!,::.,!!°.'!. ``..=..·.:',.'!,!.".!.,:!,.U'.~..?J.~.!:J:.:-.:-.,.~;, : ..~ 1::,.-::..::..:.1.,:,:..:.-::~::..:.:..:;.:..::.~,::'~ ,~-;.~:.::.::..: .;:.,::..:;_.:.:...-...:.::.~.."::..!!o":!'-!.'.~.~..";. ,~.,:~..::.;:_,::..!!.::.,!'.~..'.!.,:!'..~... :I
jAdd•o:- P. o~ lifo,K '1Q'09,07 s~n Antonio TX, USA 78246
! Arlie le 4 - Aut11ori~ed Shares
!nieTotainuinber of shares:the corporation lsauthorized to Issue andttle-parvalue of eaciiofSucfiSllares, Ori-----
l``*fi~!'J!````~h-~-~1r·~·~ ``~uMi~r````i~ar~ci-~:1~;~1ihiri"0Ta>-·---·-·-·-~:ciii"ss ____ i~e~es. . . . . . 1
! · · I · !l \t_
l ... " .. ~..... - ........ "............... J ... - - .. - ... " .... " ................................ " .. - .... - .. - ................ - ... -..:t .. "...........!•.. - .......... .
!.~-~,:~.,-``~. ·. ·``,``::.:.e~;JP~t~!;~;~:``~::~:.``.``~"~-``,-=k``=-~-=~-··=~,.``=J
1If !he sharGs ~re or
. .,``--~-~l.~..:-=.``=-~:
to be divid ad Into clas11es, you must set fortfl \he designation Of each class, the NJmber shares or each olaw, and lhe par value
!(orstatemert of no par value), of each cf1ss.1rshares of a class are to be lssuedln $erle$, you mll$1 provide lhe dcslyriaOon of HQll series. lhe
· ipreferences, Dmltallons, ancl relat!v~ rlghls oJ ell(:h elm or serte.s ~)-~ .``t~.!ll ll~f:l!.l!``~J.<:!~rl..f2!:.~!!lm~!ll~ll.UQf9Jffi!!n!?!L ..... --· -···---·-· 1
: l
lriWpurf)Oseror"'W'iiioii"ttte corporati0niSoroanized1SforffietransaeTi0nof any'anci'illaWrul businessforwhicil"-·-·~·1
Icorporations may be om.~n_l~!!d under the Texas Business Organizations Code.
::>upp1ementa1 Prov1swns 11ntom1at1on _
[·
I
! .. . .
l (TM attactted addendum, If any, (&Incorporated hereln by rererence.J
! .. :'. .
``# :~ .. ''.
l
j Effectiveness of F11lng I
-~;~!g~--?§§````I.``:§-~iii-````¥.~F.~.~-````~fi~.``~ijj``I``-fi.f``-.~;1~.--``r~f``i-``~!~=-``-.:``-:=--````=-````~--:-~.``-~--~li
I . • "• Oft.
!~a:TiliS.Cfoc~-~P-nlbaq9``s effec11ve'9TSiaterdafe-;'Wtifct1is·n-01-rii<>r0-r11·0ii·n1ii6tYcso> days iroiii"iflerp1.1mtious Section · Hope Andrade
P.O.B~ 13697
Soo>-o1n"Y or St,,to
AUstlll, leJi.11$ "/!fll l-3617
Forfeiture pursuant to Section 171.309 of the Texas Tax Code
or
Helvetia Asset Recovery~ Inc.
t'ile Number : -isuu~:>l62.4 ~ertiticate I cnarter torteited : August 28, 2009
The Secretary of State finds that:
L The Secretary has received certification from the Comptroller· ofPublic Accounts under
Section 171.302 of the Texas Tax Code indicatinJl that there are J..rrowids for the forfeiture
of the taxable entity's charter, certificate or registration; and
2. The Compttoller of Public Accounts has determined that the taxable.entity has not
revived its forfeited privileges within 120 days after the date.that the privileges were
forfeited.
Therefore, pursuant to Section 171.309 of the Texas Tax Code; the ·Secretary of State hereby
forfeits the charter, certificate or registration of the taxable entity as of the date noted above and
r~re!s this-notice oftorterture in the permanent files a11d records of the entity.
Hope Andrade
!)ecretaiy of :State
~·: ..
Come visit us on the 'tntero.et@.hltp;/(www.ws.st!l.te.tx.\1s/
(5 !2) 463-5555 FAX (:512) 463-5709 'ITV1-l-1
. ;~- .
.. ..
. : ..~·
omie or the Serretney of St!lte Filt!d in the Office.oft~
secretary ot ~tate of Texas
Cnr;P~r.ation& Section Filing·#: &0085162411102/2009
PiLBox 13697 .Document #: 28206290D002
Atis~iii, Texas 78711-3697
_______ __ ________ ____. __ ______.. _________ ___
lmaae Generated Electronioallv
(Form 801) for Web Filing
----··---.....-...-......-... ...,..._,
:- ,.,., .... ..... , , ,_ ,"
APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT AND
. REQUEST TO SET ASIDE REVOCATION OR FORFEITURE
l-lamo oflintity:
Helvetia Asset Recoverv; Inc.
1'ilo Nurnbu: 900&S1624
The taxpayer identification number is: 32033458269
1. The entity named above .was forreited or its authority to tran.sact business in Texas was
revoked on. OS/2812009 for the following reason:
to
Failure file a. fi:anchise tax return and/or pay state franchise tax.
~:; : ..
• 3.
The e~tit~:has cO``i~ted the· default and has paid all fees.. taxes, end penalties due.
· ..
':.:
·..
,i
The entity appli~·s for reinstatement and requests that the Secretary of St.at~ set aside the
forfeiture of the Texas entity or the revocation of the foreiun entity's authority, m transact
business in Tex:as, as applicable.
By BURTON KAHN
Pr~-'idcmt
FILING OFFICE C~ PY
:... :'
.i
·.. ·.
r . . ·····-·-". . ·-·---· , _____ . . .··---;)'" .
•
: .
_ _ _ .... _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .,,...,_,..,,,_ _ ``·-·
T'E:)'Ubl.11;: Aor;olJ·~ 'i!;
• IU-'TOI: TK 71.1 t• I '-'8``
.
PT"li
,I).,,.,.. •
-
b:::.:~=••••l.l":..'~r·•·===•.. • _,, .. ,,,, ;;;.:l .aJ.:., fc-CU1cll1ae !;;,,:... ;.:·(l;yui.rement:a (lml f.w ~l i\j.l.bl.e
:o'.!'." :r.eim1tatem.l!!nt tbroua!. :May l,7 r 2010.
:t-lrCHJIEI, .i\L~
En1:·0.rce-.G11.:t;. - SllD l\r.ton:!.o NE
.riekl Oper~t:i.f:lnl!l - ::?11:oi:cement
l2l0)64(,HJ'.$~,
:•, ...
'1Yre reiosle:tfsm1nr 111w1 be mea
with tile Tems Secretaty of State Pfl or 11,ram th~ txf'/tati«J date of lhls
fetter. FOIUlS and itlSfl'/il:tbls for ~ln$tstemant can befoUnd at w11tiw.sos.stste.tx.US/c~1'orms_optiais.shtml
or by calltng (512) 4fi3~5581. This tlDt ofearancs letter mut:t l'Je itttacf?M 10 ma Mmmrsmmzr tDims.
NOTE: ff i'he fltltlly falls to re/Jlsrere on or before me ta~ otear~cs oate indiGalBd Fn thrs terter, ttiiatlllcnhlp
'the file 1111mber mewl ED the fitms entity by tho~ of 111ate 11: 0 f t!J 0 g's:'"! &2-c/
1.'he da~of~on Qftht cntJ.ty 1! A~r ~/ 2-ao.7
1 Aalauled N«me
' ' :. (ICClm'PWP"~cd'*1i~uf"''''''lllbcntb 1111·...._ .,..._,.altfii::'~llly._.lba MIU>fl»s-...iJ
.'11= mmn#ent ~ die cei;tifioa~ of fO?Dtlbon to olwl,gc mo a.rflcle or J1t0"1$1on the:t names the
films Cllht1 ~ « p?V'/Ut1J1111 emen4ed. io ~•follows
. . ;.. :'The
. . . ·
n.e-.eote1t:.milym.tcoittta1um.``or·~ di~ ar'11611:rm, •~lm1ilc.
l. Ant.ended· Registered Agentla`` omcc
Tbil ~ cbm:1ges lhe catifica1e of forrmdlon to dlange the sttlcte or ptoVi&lon atatl'Og the
ilamo' O! the rr:81stmcl s.ge&rt mid lbC R,StStctCd o(6co alfdtW TJf the illhtg amty. ~ articfo or
llt'0\'1B10D .. mnen!ltd. ta read as folloM
, r,
....
."
'• •, '
7/09ll01J ~Bs28 CMT+2 g9 Cai:ol Ad11111s HAT LTD l+l 786 SO& 0342) p`` +1 512 C63 5709
.Rol~AJtat
,/
(eov,plm aflhar A or·B, liattltit llotb .Ahia ee1BJ;11el8 C)
0 A 'I&e ~ agciat 11 aaorpmzab.OD. (-bollDll1r .-ed~)b,&enuie of
OK· ..
0 » '.Ihc~llplt as anmdlvldual ~atclent o!lb11-.~ r,w:a``
MiMl'WJol,t_. 'if~. ,_e.il.Li . ~ .
Tho pC:non eitecutmg thl111.Nlnlmmt idlinnd tbat thei ~ dC81pBtcd •.die new rcguktlSd Ajerit
hU~mcl 1o icin-elll ~agcn\ _ _ ~
C. 'Tb.•'bamal a~ of'ibe`` md th1uegt~!f ~ ~U!
· l3tL3.
lirM Mhlr (Hof' 0 BOllil •
ftA'fltd. ~r $+i CIP~ TX
l1ll,tJ
7G~
?iP t"'*
:J.. OIUr Added, Alta:c~ m;o Veleted PrnfdOIUI'
Ollila-dmpl cirailo1lllcmli '6diooerl!ir.ate 0H:11malfmt 11J&11ic-Utn. l»IJllCll priJv!Wbclaw ltlht lplllll p:ovi.tcd
Is ~mt.~ llu: lld4ltlotsl est 1'r;nw. . 1111.......,mrtrt t">fll.9·.tbml. llZea.,e hlll.d fJo lmtriiatlAJll to di.ls
I .f'clim mz
&rdlcrlllfllcmldtllil Ila~ '
-r--'... (TM~ ............ tr11117,fl``- e ,;.,, k.'61!1
:Ad.d e.oh of tkc:i fi>llOWUl8 prcmaicma to tJie acxufitatc of:&mbat1cl! The idcntUicc.hcn 111:
tetilt'elll::e oft.be .&fidiinMs"iOI) lnld !ha f\11.1 feltt &ta U follMIVI
fH``Nr lo~ut R,;J, · S ftfl bO 'Sflfi `` is ~Wll> ;;- ~;~:,
l/.l(!E .~.o~i>I fl{et'I $GE:fl-1SetJ ,15/ .JA!.261 fbl9 #{ lfif6'11ti»7D~1·
1>•Cec."f<>1' ft,~ilf" ~--.· ~lt/2M:i (i~ tlll,.l 112 s;``,,,,, OtJ"r 1.0d ~
··.·
J.A'
Stat.enu=nt of Applln'•I.
Tlt1: •• ``~ to the oe:rtlticatc offuxm&tioll btwe beeis approwcl 111 ~c:i mahutteqwrcd by the
· Ttim encmtii Otpnmllons Code a Wthe govemmg doa!:mentsotthc mttty.
:~· .
1
, ,. "
. .
:"7/o,/ao13 19 48 CIKT-+2 De• c-.,01 ~d&lll!I HA~ ~ <•1 1aG so• oJ,a) Para• +1 s1a •6S 5709
2106379315 PAa:: e31aa
. ~·:
RECEIVED
Sf:P 18 2013
.. :. . Effectiveness of Filing (Sa\eetddler,,\,B.bl'C.) .se~retary of State
A 00
'I'his d.eC1ime:ot beoomcs cf&~wbcn.tbc do~ is filed by the JCC1'dar.Y of B1ate
B .0 Tll1S ~ont beCu!m;S drcctlw ,.ta lateT date, whlOh ~ n~ J;11C10 'Ihm mncty (9'>) dayB 1n1m
tht ·daf.c of ii~· Tfio delayed ~datefr
C D This di)ciumil!:ftttlka effect upcm the 'ocautmt~ of• tw:UJ:e ~t or f(lct, other sban the
p~ of'tlmi;. '.l'ho 90"'·d.cl;T a&r the date Of8'pmg IC . • .
I
EJtt.Otiftll
Tlle U!l.d.ersigne'1 "&lgll$1h18 cJomrndllt Nl>Jeet co dl.e pcawucs smposed 'by 11.w fin the Sllbmls&zon of a
tmteMUY. ihls.e m ftau.dolcat ~e)'lt md ccmfies under penalty 6!~ that me '\Uldemped is·
ambcm:ed uaacr me l)fOVJ$SDna ofblw ~& ihe cntu,y to`` the:filmg mstrunumi.
~. Jl;J::Jt;1$ .
lllmolt«~llllHDf~ Ai'icoiilliiiallllU)
. ~ ...
B
,
.,
•.
Form424 This space ~ed far office use.
(Revised OS/11)
Subinit in dupl.icate to:
Secretary of State
P.O. Box 13697-
Austin, TX 78711-3697 Certitiea te· of Amendment
512 463~5SSS
FAX: 512/463-5709
Filiri F": See imtnidieoa
The name of the filing entity is:
·.
!fe41'e-TJI} l)SSEI TCE'k."[/R~G
State Ille.name of the entity as Qlfll:lltly shown ill thr: rcoords of tJic ~ of state. lfthc amendment clumgcs the name
of thecntitY,, State the old name~ not die MWnarne. · .
The filing enti'-f ·is a: (Sdc.O. lhc 8PPn>Pl'illl: Clltily type below.)
~For11ro6t Corporation 0 PtofwlonAI Corporation
0 N!lD}ml~t Cprpotation 0 Professional Limited. Li.ability Company
0 CoO~e Association 0 JirofessitmAI Assoc!ation
0 Limited"Li11bility Company 0 Lhni~cd Pamitrship
``·:ruen``r~edtothefi``gentityby``erejUY_Qf~tei~;· ~p()'fs{&.hf
The date of f~ation ~fthe entity is:
:
{)~IZ/22_
- ........I'-"'-=+,.&e:I--....-------~-----
7
Amendments
l. AmendecrName
(Ifthe pwposc' of~ ccrtificale of.mncncfmcnl is la d1ange ~name ofJhc Clllity. USC the followiDS stalt:mcnt)
The ~endment ~hanges the certificate- r;>f fonnation to change the article or provision tJu4,. OQles the
filing entify. The.articlC? or provision is amended to read as follows:
The.riam~ ~f.~ filing entity is: (state the new.name of the entity belo"'.)·
The name or~ Clllity muslcontaiG an orpnbitional daignalioll m:j!CCCpU:d abblnilllion ofsudl term, a:1upplicable.
.•. ~ .
l. Amended Regiate~ kent/R~tered Office
The amendment changes the certificate o,f fo~on to change the article or provision stating the
name of the . registered agent and the1iregjstered' ~fflce address of the filing entity. The article or
provision is llinended to reatl as follows:f"'.. ·
··-~·......
.. .·
.·
I
Registered Agent
(Complete ¢ither Aor B, but not both. Also complete C.)
0 A. The registered agent is an organization (c11nnot be cn1i1y named above) by the name of:
FlrJ1 Na~ ·· '. · J:tr,;;JiC
M.f. , S11ffi~
The person executing this instrument affirms that the person designated as the new registered agent
has conserited to sc:rvc: as regi:itl:rt:d agent. ·
C. The business address of the registered agent and tlte registered office address is:
1706 /ttft1ff[ Cf ~j,.z;; .$M J/-/J:f/(!MI 0 TX 7 g_?-lfP-
$/N;t/ ;lc!Jrm /No P.O. Bo:c) City Stale Zip ('(}{ft
3. Of her Added, Altered, or Deleted Provisions
Other changes or-udditlons 10 the ~ertificate of formation may be made in ihe space provided below. lf the spa~c pTDvided
is insufficient, incorporau: the addi1iona1 tcic:t by providing an :ittnchmcnt 10 tltis form. Please read the lns1ruc1ions 10 this
form for fllrth~r in formation on fonnat.
'fc.-.:t Ar~':l {'Ole ~tt:i~h.cll·nddcndum, ihny, 15 lncorporal~d lu:reln by rc(crcncc.).
provisions io 1he cettifici;ite of tormation. ~iden~ficatlon. ~
~dd_.e11ch of. the following
ofthe·,t:JvJ{Vvision and the tull text nre ns follows;,.. !Ji-If "p-~µ r·
rcterence
B t} en>//.. /'/ ~t:~ St:::&flUT/J-f2J/f 'Pl'&~-1'8 . .
1101P·lf~111e czrq.c; L.~ ·
. /t-f{/(t>f 1&,.· (Y 7R?- r:r .
·
U A~ter·ench of the following provisions of the c·ertitkate of formation. The idenlitication or
reference of.the .altered provision and th~ full text 9fthe provision as amended are as follows;
.·.·: :.': Statement of Approval
The ll\t\lll - - - • -· • ·+' Tho SeCTetary of Stde'I: 01111e has f>!OCentd)'OI»' request. Please rind attGhedlhe paddn.11 sllp (oryo11r SCS$IC111:
>OOtiSMinl 103013~3338
engineer consu!!Prmt II• bulk order IA$ been pla;i=d please' llHoaon al htte:l/lfi"Ktsos.stilleb.us
Is rff1.Sf'l!"S Defm!S.
Julie P£chres. i;
I Oftice cl lite Seor$ry of Stab! dfTl!Xlls
KB
!curnenf Number Documert Tyoe stalU.<: . Reeelyed Oat~ D:!cumert Eiw
I NQNE l 51186~ corporations - Order Processed 10/30/2013 8:40:23 AM $32.00
TOTAL FEE: $32.00
PAYMENf DETAIL
9atcb Number Payment !Wmber Paymert Type .Reoetvesi Date
:rOTAL PAYMENT: S0.00
SESSION BALANCE: $32.00
IN=t:stis'llfri's``€ic':hll
Instn.ptiors:
ct. INST~l.CTIONS NEED WRITIEN FOR THIS SCREEN.
· .• ; l~ ... :
10130/2013 9:54 AM
' . t'jl1!1 ?-~(•>. E··``.•_o11;~-._````"!'**hic:ontouu.lcn I!!} ) er.~me Iools· .jl~hr',1 ~ AOOl6 "t:ielp .~ J ..
1
iJ:IJkiU!iU•lU#fu~lt.Mii•itiikf•Wfal AQi#Mi#dllf6$fflJld4if§i.-#iiBtilM?;~::,- - -------·- . lL !st,-, ,_, _ ..
E.lle i;dl~ ~ew' Hlstorv. ~art&C~X``........Mt • flib"e··
. ff;ime: tfelvetia ASsel Re:i'muy, Inc, . • -- r,....~
! Add1ess!
•
t : ·~@ 11
1706Al..PINE CIR
San Antonio, 1X 76248-210.C Us.e.
··"· ·· • d1 ·p.No , 1FDna~"'~--- ·;ftredlVeO:it• 'l!!."ccnd .....,~.ioecoum ``
1
....
' ? ... ,,......H ··-· -= ~
.... •
·1 1~·~·
'
~.;,:.,=
;-~-- r.,,
'if'Y
'-
'\..
-1111:~
- I . ·-· J_,.,.,.... · , - ·.,_ n _ , .. : -- : ``~:!012 ~·:?12 :=JNo ' ~ .. .... ~
II 11\U ~'l1~T..'Ql0'2 ~Ot'RUllttCll~m;.o ·~1B,:lOl3 :~rt&,21113
l~M>ber27,2'13
!.Nii. !rz 'i
-• ·- ..
~ . . . . . . . . . . . . _... . . _..___=!"~.['~-___,~---1w~,!J
jSIJllember21;3313 INo 3
· ·· -. r I
_fO'idiiil fRSiUm"b':'s~]
.
JnsJCUC1jDD~:
e Ta placo an order !or add~ionat nformelion about .a fi~ng PJ8SS the 'Orde1' button.
~
,o Firefox al..llQmatt~lly sen:1s ·~me ®"to M;;iu;;-;;-fr.lat we cm1mp-ove-you- e>p.ef'ltne. . · ~Q'loose:whaEl.stki;r::J '"·
iYst'ai-tl fmP&Lice R.eP'.. Jl~.--i>aµC"r~rt:~ · .--1r.~.·orag-o~a·r'--"~ ..-J~skyp;~H: E1s1 ... IJ~e&si&i:ss~;:-;f .I~ O.!l.~.:..?J19;_~ 1
.·
~
e e e
"https:f/ouro'ftil.Cpa.staw.tx.uslcoa/s~i~t1cpa.epp.coa.~aOfficer
• WmdowonSta.reGovernment Susan C'Dmbs Ttlt1t Comptroller of Publlc.Aaou1n:s
Taxable Entitv Search Results
Taxable Entity Search
. Officers and Ditectors
BELVETIA ASSET RECOVERY, INC.
Report Year: 2012
&tum ID: ISX!lblc Ertilv Search &sults
Officer end .!fircctor information on this site is obtained from the mostreceniPubl\c Information Report (PJR) proocssed
by-tho Secretary of Slate (SOS). PlRs filed with annual framhisc taxreporta Bre forwarded to tho SO.S. After ·_:,
propessing,·the SOS sends the Cnmptrolleran electronic copy of the inlbnnation, which is: displayed on this web &it.a.
Tho infonnalion will be updated 11$ <:hanees arc rc<:civcd from the SOS. · ·:
You may order e .copy of a Puhlfo Jnformation Report from gpm,r~s@cpa.s1ate.tx.us or Comptroller of Public
Accoum, Open Govemncnt Division, PO Box 13528; A~tin. TeXBs 78711.
:,,
TItie Name and Address
SECRETARY BURTON KAHN
~I:•• · 1706' ALPINE CIRCLE
SAN ANTONIO, TX 78248
PRESIDENT BURTON KAHN
1706 ALPINE CIRCLE
SAN ANTONIO. 1X 78248
DIRECTOR BURTON.KAHN
1706 ALPINE CIRCLE
,·:
SAN ANTONIO, TX 78248
texas.gov I Statewide Search from the Texas state Library I State link Polley I Texas Homeland Security
Susan Combs, Texas Comptroller • Window on State Government • Contact Us
Privacy and .S~urlty PolleyI AccesslbllltY Polley I Unk POiiey I PUbllc Information Act I Compact with
Texans
l ofl '· Exhibit H 11/l/2013 5:09 AM
. .i;ait
Ff.llllChisc
.
A:ccount Sl:atus .llltps://ourcpa.cpa.s!a!ll.tx.uslcoafserv Jc11cpa.app.coa.COll(JetTp7Pg=lpid...
: ,,;,.
Franchise Tax Account St~tus
As of: 11/0112013 05:09:23 AM
This Page.is Not Sufficient for Filings·'with the Secretary of State
HELVETIA. ASsET RECOVERY, INC.
Tex.as Thxpayer Number 32033458269
Mailing Address 1706 ALPINE CIR
... SAN ANTONIO,. 'IX 78248-2104
Right tQ 1ransact Busfuess ACTIVE • ELIGIBLE FbR TER..VIINATiONIWD·
in Texas
·~St~teofFonnation TX
·. Effectiy~ ·SoS Registration 08/02/2007 "
" ~·~. ;.."{_.. .oa~
Texas SOS File Number 0800851624
Registered Agent Name BURTON KAHN
....
Registered Offi.ce Street 1706 ALPINE CIRCLE
A.ddre:is SAN ANTONIO, TX 78248
:·• ..
1.ofl 11(1/2013 5:09 AM
·STATE OF TEXAS §
§
. COUNTY OF BEXAR §
Alt"'FIDAVlT
. B~FORE MB the W\dersigned authority, on this day personally appeared
-r-~..=:.:.....................'-'-1~'"'"'~-who by me being duly swom deposes as follows:
:My ruune 1s el
1 am over 21 ·years of age. of sound
mind, capable of making this affidavi and personally acquainted with the facts herein
stated:
I am employed by the CITY OF L,IVE OAK POLICE DEPARTMENT, and as
such I am the custodian of records of the said Police Department. Attached hereto are
c>2 pages reported of the incident of t."5Cf?-O 7 ( 5 from the Live Oak
Poli"c Ocpmtmcnt.
I have attached as put of this Affidavit a true and correct copy of the original
·record now in the lawful custody and posscs.gon of the RECORDS SECTION of the
CITY OF LIVE OAK POLICE DEPARTMENT, 8022 Shin Oak. Live 0814 TX 78233 .
•Thc .......d r=tdsarekept by me intbe"'~71ofbu~- . ,?
(4111.t&L .dau_
oflice.
Co~i~ion Expires: ~I
r 21Jli.o I? I
Exhibit I
10/31/13 Live Oak Police Department 368
10:59 Public ~nformation Report Page! 1
Incident Number: 1309-0715
Nature: C~vil Matter case Numbers:
Addr: 8022 SHIN OAK DR; LIVE OAK PD Area: B ZONE B
City: Live Oak St: TX Zip: 78233 Contact: BURTON !(thc "'"J?Pration. Tran;;frr t•'!.1rictions. if any. nrc s!town abo\'c-..
Dcucd th~
Exhibit J
r---------~-------------------------------1
COMMON·STOCK CERTIFICATE
L
THIS CERTIFIES THAT
ISTHE OWNER OF FULLY PAID 1000 SHARES AUTHORIZED Or COMMON STOCK IN REGARDING
HELVETIA ASSET RECOVERY INC. ~
.µ
·rl
THE CORPORATION IS ORGANIZED UNDER THE LAWS OF STATE OF TE~S ,Q
·r-l
~
IU
O.AT.ED. _ _ _ _ _ __ AT SAN ANTONl.O~ TEXAS
· ·PRESIDENTS.IGNATURE ',. DIRECTORSl.GNATURE...___ _ __
:r,
...
MINUTES OF THE ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING OF
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
HELVETIA ASSET RECOVERY, INC.
A FOR~l'ROFIT CORPORATION
I .
The Qrganizational meeting of the Board of Directors of Helvetia A~set 'Recovery, Tnc., a Texa.c;
business corporation (hereinafter "Business Corporation"}. was held at 1715 Hadbnry Lane, San
Antonio, Texas 78248, on August 8, 2007. ·
The 1.lndersigned, being the sole member of the initial Board of Directors of Helvetia Asset
Recovery, Joe. named in the Business Corporation's Certificate of Fonnation filed with the
Secre\al)' of State of Texas, was present. Tue undersigned waived notice ofth.e meeting as
evide~oed hy the attached Waiver of Notice signed and appended hereto .
.Lloyd George was appointed Chairman of the meeting and Lloyd George was appointed
Secretary of the meeting.
CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION
The Secretary then presented end read to the meeting a copy of the Certificate of Formation and
reported that the original thereof was filed in the office of the Secretary of Stale of the State of
on
Texas August 1, 2007, and that the Secretary of State issued a fonnal Acknowledgment of
Filing to the Business Corporation on that date. The Secretary pr~ented the Acknowledgment of
Filing annexed to an approved duplicate of the Certificate of Formatioµ as filed and it was
ordered inserted into the corporate record book.
BYLAWS
' .
The Secretary then presented a proposed fonn of bylaws. The proposed bylaws were read to the
meetirig, considered and upon motion duly r.nade, seconded and carried, were adopted as and for
the Bylaws of the Business Corporation and ordered signed.and inserted into the corporate record
book. The Secretary of the Business Corporation was instructed to maintain a copy of the
Bylaws at the principal office of the Business Corporation availab1Cil .fQr inspection by the
$hru:eholderg of the Business Corporation.
PRINCIPAL OFFICE
,· 1.
Upon motfon duly made, seconded and carried, it was
RESOLVED, that the Business Corporation's principal office be located and maintained
at 1715 Hadbury Lane, San Antonio, Texas, 7&248 and that meetings of the Board of Directors
from time. to time may be held either at the principal office or at such other place as the board of
direct(?rS shall from time to time order.
.·.: ·'
-------------
Exhibit L
~-------···~
MINUTE BOOK AND COltPORATE RECORDS
The Secretary submitted to the meeting the corporate record book for maintenance of the
Business Corporation's records. Upon motion duly made, seconded and calried, it was
.. ``OLVED, that the corporate record book is adopted as the record book of the
\X)tporatio~, and further,
RESOLVED, that the Business Corporation maintain appropriate co.rporate reuonh in
the C!>i;?Otate record book, including but not limitoo to original.s9 copies or certified copies of the
Business Corporation's original and any amended, corrected or restated, Acknowledgment of
Filing, Certificate of Fonnation. ByJaws, minutes of meetings of shareholders and directors, and
written consents of shareholders and directors. .
OFFICERS
'
The Chairman of the meeting then called for the election of officers of the Business Corporation.
The following persons were nominated ~o the office preceding their name: ·
Office Name
President Kenneth E. Moore
Secretary Kenneth E. Modre
· Tre0.l!urer · Kenneth E. Moore.
No further nominations being made the nominat[ons were closed and the directors proceeded to
vote on the nominees. The Chainnan announced that the foregoing nominees were elected to 1he
offices-set before their respective names to serve as such at the pleasure of the Board of Directors
or pursuant to the terms of any written employment agreement executed by the Business
Corporation·and
:. ; ....
the respective officer.
SHARE CERTIFICATES
: ~ .'
The Secretmy submitted to the meeting a specimen share certificate proposed for use as the
corporate certificate for shares. Upon motion duly made, seconded and earned. it was
RESOLVED, that the form of the share certificate presented to meeting is adopted to
represent-shares of the Business Corporation; that any issued certificates bear all legends and
n:strktions requiied by the Bylaws or resolution of the Business Corporation, contract or by law;
that any issued certificates comply with any requirements of the Bylaws or resolution of the
Business Corporation. contract or appli~able law; and that the Secretary of the Business
Corpoi;ation insert a sp&:imen copy of said share certificate in the minute book of the Business
Corporation.
2
-··-·-·"'. _____ __ ,,, ---··. --· --------···---·· . ·--- . - . ------
.. '.\.
ISSUANCE OF SHARES
Upon motion duly made, seconde.d and carried, it was
RESOLVED, that the Business Corporation issue 1000 shares of the Business
Co?JJoT!i~ion's authori:7.ed shares of common stock (no par value), for a purchase price of $1.00,
each, as f ci~lows:
~ No. of Shares Consideration Value
Puerto Verde, Ltd. l,000 Cash $1,000.
Upon motion duly made, seconded and carried, it was
:. RESOLVED, that upon receipt of the consideration. the officers of the Business
Corporation are authori:zed to issue share certificates to the persons named above and to obtain, if
advisable; representations from any purchaser that the shares are being acquired for investment
purposes and m:it for distribution, an~ further
RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors of the Business Corporation may upon such
terms as the Board of Directors in its discretion may dctennine, issue authorized shares of the
Business Corporation for consideration consisting ()f any tangible or intangible benefit to the
Business Corporation or other property of any kind or nature, incll!ding cash, promissory notes,
services perfonned, contracts for services to be performed, other securities.ofthe Business
Corporation, or securities of any other corporation, domestic or foreign, or other entity.
BANK ACCOUNT
Upon motion duly made, seconded and carried. it was
RESOLVED, that the Business Corporation establish in its name one or more accounts
with one or more fmancial institutions on such tenns and conditions as may be agreed with said
finanoial inst!rutlons, and that the officers of the Business Corporation are aulhorized to execute
any resolutions required by said financial institutions for such accounts and to designate the
person or persons authorized to write checks on such accounts on behalf of the Business
Col')lomtion'.
ORGANIZATIONAL COSTS
Upon'~o~ion <;lulY, made, seconded and carried, it was
RESOLVED, 1hat the attorney's fees, filing fees and other expenses and charges incurred
and that m~y he incurred by the Business Corporation. or persons acting on behalf of the Bu~iness
Corp.oration in connection with the fonnation of the Business Corporation are reasonable and
shall be p~d or reimbursed by the Business Corporation.
;.
3
-
·~-·-·-··
FISCAL YEAR
Upon motfon duly made. seconded and carried, it was
RESOLVED, that the fiscal year ofthe Business Corporation shall begin on January 1
and enq o~.December 31, provided that the initial fiscal year of the Business Corporation shatl
begin as of the date hereof. ·
TAXES
Upon motion duly made, seconded and carried, it was
RESOLVED, that the officers of the Business Corporation obtain infonnation and
iµstructio~ from the Internal Revenue Service, Comptroller of the State of Texas and other
app1icable taxing authorities regarding withholding and other taxes.
LICENSES AND PERMITS
Upon motion duly made, seconded and carried, it was
RE~OLVED, that the officers of the Busin~ Corporation are authorized to obtain on
behalf of the Business Corporation all licenses and pennits that may be required for the Business
Corporatfon to cauy out its lawful business IUl:d activities, and further,
....-.
. .. : ~OLVED, that the officers of the Business Corporation are authorized to do all things
and take all action necessary to qualify the Business Corporation to carry out its lawful business
and acti.yi`` in compliance· with applicable federal. state and local Jaws, _orwnances and
regulatio~.
, . ,,t···_.,' .
·QUALIFICATION IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS
Upon motion duly made, seconded and carried, it was
' RESOLVED> that for the pmpose of authorizing the Business Corporation to do business
·in any sta~, territory or dependency of the United States or any foreign country in which it is
necessary or expedient for the Business Corporation to transact business, the proper officers of
the Dusfoess Corporation aro hereby iiuthorizcd to appoint and :sub~itute all nc;ccssary agents or
attorneys ·ror service of process, to designate and change the location of all necessary st.ttutory
offices and 't.o make and file all necessary certificates. reports, powers of attomey and other
instruments as may be required by the laws of such state, territory, dependency or country to
authorize the Business Corporation to transact business therein.
FURTHER INSTRUCTIONS TO OFJ!'ICERS
,-..., Upon tiiotion duly made, seconded and carried, it was
'
.. ~
4
: .·-;,.,.
.· "
~ ..
RF~c;;OLVEO, that 1he officers of the Busines!: Corporation are authori'l".ed to do all thingi;:
and take all action necessary and helpful to carry out the above resolutions and al I acts of the
"Officers arid any persons acting for the Business Corporation which are consistent with the above
resolutions are ratified and adopted as the acts· of the Business Corporation. ·
Upon motion duly made, seconded and carried, it was
• RESOLVED that the signina of these minutes shall constitute full ratification thereof
and waiv~rofnotice of1he meeting by the signatories.
.. .
Upon motion duly made, seconded and carried, it was
· RESOLVED that Lloyd George resigned as an office and director of the Business
Corporation, and 1hat resignation was accepted."
The Chainnan asked whe1her there was any further business to come before the Direclors al this
meeting, Bnd 1here being no response, 1he meeting was adjourned.
DATE: August 17, 2007.
WAIVER OF NOTICE AND CONSENT
RESOLVED, that the UDdersigned, being the sole member of the inltial Bo:itd of
Direetors:PfHelvetia Asset Recovery-, Inc. named in the Business CoJPOration's Certificate of
F o~_ati.Qn filed with. the Secretary of State of Texas, by approving the Minutes of the
Organizational Meeting of the Directors, and by this resolution, does hereby waive notice of the
time ~d,place of the meeting, consents to the meeting and approves the contents of the Minutes
ofthe.Organiz.ational Meeling of the Directors.
Lloyd~
Date signed: Augyst 17. 2007
5
.~. . '
.. '/'._·,,
Curtis Baggett
Expert Document Examiner
908 Audelia Road, Suite 200-245, Ricllard£Ot\, Texas 750Q1
Phone: 972.644.0285 *Fax: 972.644.5233
S!O~.&Llltt@P!.m.ctim
````tl:ixsinin£!:&Q!Il
- - · - - - -Questioned
· - -Document
- · ·----·--·-------
Examiner Letter
Subject: K~nneth E. Moore
Date: September 27,20lp
I have exami``4 three (3) documents with the known signatures of Kenneth E. Moore. For the
pw pose of lhls· examluation I have labeled these e.xhibits "K 1•' and "K2".
Today I have compared the signatures ofKenneth E. Moore on the "K" documents to the
Kenneth E. Moore signatures on the questioned document, identified herein ss "Q l" to
detennine if the author of the Kenneth E. Moore signatures on tb.e "K" documents was the same
.,, . person who. aµthored the name of Kenneth E. Moore on the questioned document: A certificate ·
for 1000 shares for Helvetia Asset Reeovecy Ine. dat.ed August 20, 2007 and purportedly signed
by Kenneth E.Moore.
An examination of handwriting includes establisl1ing patterns of writing habits to help identify
the author. Handwri'fing i!.l formed by repeated habits of writing by the author, which are created
by neuro-pathways established in the brain. These nellfO.pathways control muscular and nerve
movement for wriung whether the wTiting is executed by the hand, foot, or mouth. ..
In support of my opinion, I ba:ve included an exceipt from Handwriting Iderztjflcation, Facts and
Fundamentals by 'Roy A. Huber and AM. Headrick (CRC Press LLC.1999, pp S0-51) wherein
the l~ing forefathers of document examination in the USA agree that one significant difference
in the fundamental structure of a wtl1ing compared to an.other is enough to preclude comnton
authOrship:
[Ordway] Hilton stated: C.} Conway expressed the same theme when he wrote: «A series of
fundamental agreements ~ jdentifying individualities is requisite to the concluSioa that two
writings were \•author«J by the same. person, whereas a &ingle iimdomental difference in. an.
identify.Qlg indhiiduality between two writings precludes the conclusion that they were exeeu.ieiJ.
by the same,p~on." ·· ·
t .,.
and finally;'·
[A1bert S.] Osbdm and others have generally·agrecd that despite numerous- similarities in
two sets.·of wi'itings, a conclusi9n of identity cannot be made if there is 0ne or mo~
differences in fundamental features of the writi11gs.
Based upon thorough analysis of these items and' from an application of accepted forensic
do~ument examination tool!;, principles and..techniques, it is my professi.ona! expert opinion that
a different person authored 1he name of Kenneth E. Moore on the questioned document.
Someone did indeed fo~e the signature of' Kenneth E. Moore on the gueslioned document,
"Q1:·.
·· · · I am .willing to ·testify to this fact fo a court of law and r will. ,Provide exbibits to the Court
showing that J ·had sufficient data .and that .my opinion is correct. My Curriculum Vitae is
attached and ini:.orpoxated herein by reference.
Respectfully subinitted,
~wJ'8..,,c.
Curt Baggett.. ,'· ,
State ofTex:as. §.
§
CoUl'lty ofDallaS §
l'h~ above .LP~er of Opinion was swom to and subs~ribed before me by Curt Baggett thisJ...1
day ;0f Septem~er 2013 .
..... '
~(·.
·"!~ ``-~:·
~-:
•
EXBIBITl
1: · .: Ac``fr:oGM``o~REqE1ProF$``~tr:!fA~;Nr:: . J
. BQY,-!ir. Helvetia Asset Recovery Inc,
sener: Maple.au&h Holdings, Ui;t.
S'ettfament Agent: Nnrth American Tltte Company
(210)4S4-0092
Placa·of~emement: 12wu sant>atiro Avenue,.su1te 406 ·
. . Sa1tAnton!c1 TI< 78216
SeWerneltl J;>afe: 1"wember 19, 2007 .....
Property looatfon: 215 Vimartt L!lls Key Largo SubdMslon
Sa11. Aatonio, n<.00000
Bexar COUnty, T~xas
215 Vacant l.ots, Key Largo
SUbdfV!sl;on, San AolDnlO',
Beimr Coul'l!y, TeJ!all
I hava c:erel\.rlly rav~ .the Hl,10..1 ~ettJement Statemeo1 end to 1he best of 01y ~ and t>ellef, It.is a true and
a~rale etalel\'\i!Jfll'.tif ~II raoelpbs and dlsbUrsements tnade·Dll my ao::ounl or by rM IQ fhls tra11S&cllon. I further certify
that I have rerelv.e~ a ~py·ot'the HU0··1 Sel\lement Statemenl.
- ........ ·"· .
•Helvetia AIP.)l``ry In~ Maple auSh Hold!n9s, Ud.
~l
``__,
BY:
_... -.
'.i·
,'· •.
.··;.
QDE EXHIBIT
~\
. /
EXHIBITl
accounts with ona or more tinaneial instill.ltions on suc;h t.ettns anti ~ohdmone as mey
be agreed Wllh -said financial lnstitullons. and 1J'lat the (lfficers of the a®tne~s
Corporatiari am authoriz.ed a execute any ms.ofutlons ~llired- by .said financial
.institutions for such accounts and to deeignate the person or petsons authorized to
wri1e cheeiks on such acx:ounts on.behalf of1he Business Coipora:tion,
FURTffe~ INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFICERS
Upon motion duty made, ~nded and carried, it was
RESOLVED, tftat fue e officers of t~ Business Corporatkln are authorized to do
.all things and~ .all aclion necessary and helpful to carry out the above resolutions
a.nd all acts of tile officers :and any persons acting for !he Business Corparation which
ara consistent With the above resolution~ are_ratffled and ooQPted as lhe acts of too
Business Cotporatiart.
Upon motion duly made, seconded and carried, it was
RESOLVED, Iha'- the signi~ of these minutes shall constifute run tatifkatior.i thetrof
anil wahrcrof notice oft'he meeting by rtic signatories.
Upon motion !iiJly nr.Jde, aecan.ded and carried, it was
RCSOLVl:D that K~neth e. Moore resigned as a11 officer and director of the
Business Corpora1ion ;rnd 1hat reslgnatton was accepted. ·
The Chairman a·sked whether there was any fwttier business to come before the .
Olrectors attlli.s:``ncl. thete being no response, t1'te meeting WfiS ~djo~51d.
l,)~TE: Qcltlber23,2009.~&\r(, ti~
Kenn&th 'E. Moore·
WAIVER Of; NOTICE AND CONSENT
RESOJ...\IED, lhat the undersigned, beirtg 1he sole trlember of the B<>Eird of
Oirectors ofHetvetia A!i!et Rcr:ovcry. me. namod in theBwi~ Coq1Qtalion's Certificate of
Formmion, flied with the Secietar;y of State of Texas, by ~p?fovlng tfle Minute~ 6f the
Oqjani.mtiomil Meeting gf the Directors, and by th~ m.$0lution, does hereby waive
notice of the tim& $nd place of the meatfng, comenls 1o the 111eeti119 and approves the
contem.s of the Minutes of the Meetin9.of1he Olfa~.
· ,..__,..... ...... -~!~i;igned P~o9er 23. 2009.
..
... : ``~(~
Kenneth a, Moore
./
•..
.EXHl'BIT3
··,· ;• ...
-· The snare~ represented by tbis ccrtiticaro hsYe not i><.'Ctl registered under 1hc Securities Acr bf
1933. as ~ndc9. or any applicablt state securities taws. and may not he transferred. sokl or
assig~P unll$S so regisccrcd or unlcs.s an exempdoo froin such reglc;tratioD is availabfc.
Ccrli ficarc Nwntx:rOO1 1,000 Sh.arcs
....
iNCORPORATfiD UNDER THE Lt. ws o``h·e~AS
... - ...
HELVETIA ASSET. RECOVE.lt~(L:~C.
This. t¢rUfies that Pu~rto V1mJ~ Inc. _ DWJlS 1.000 shftt'l:·Ji uf SOJ.lO par value CQnHl'n'in st-ock Df
Holvctii\ Ali~ ~ovcry l ttc.~ tmnsfcrrsbfo-only McNeesc State University, Lake Charles, Louisiana; and post-grad\lllte
studies at.the University of Houston, Houston, Texas.
Curt Baggett's library is extensive and incfodes literature on questioned doewnent examination, forensic
handwriting analysis, behavior profiling, and statement analysis.
Laboratory· equiJ)incnt used for examination consists of a Stereo Star Zoom American Optical 7'17. -'- 30x
twin mieroBcope; Micronta illuminated 30x mioroscope; stereo microaeope S/ST series; universal
DigiScop:ing adapter; numerous magnifying devices; protractor and metric measuring diwices; Pentax !vffi
camera; Pentax macro 1.4, 50nun flat copy lens; ovfilh.ead projector; light table, and transparencies.
Cu:rt B~ge1i'is Educ1atluq and Training i11 Handwriting and Document Exlll1llnatlon Include:
An ·in-person, two-year apprenticeship with Dr. Ray Walker a.s a handwriting expert and questioned
document examiner. Dr. Walker's qualifications have been affirmed in the Cowt of Appeals, Fifth
District of Texas at Dallas, and had historical .r:ulings in his favor. A leading authority :in the field of
handwriting analysis and document examination, Dr. Walker is the author of The Questioned Document
Examiner and the Justice System.
Mr. Baggett is certified by ~e American Bureau of Docvment Examiners. He also has a certifii:ate of
completion :from the American Institute of Applied Science.
Rev l l/1113
·.,,·.-· ;\·
,": -~ ···...
'·
Lectu~es. "conferences, and Classes Attended;
2004 School of Forensic Document Examination's Annual Conference, Dallas, Teicas
_ Att~ded cl.as&es taught by Reed Hayes, QDE, Katherine Kcppenhaver, QDE, Bill Kopp~aver,
qnE.
of
2004 School Forensic Document Examination's Teleclass Cumculum
· En~ation of Anonymous Writing by Reed Hayes. QDE
Dncuinent Examination Tenninology by Don Lehew, QDE
Notary Public by Don Lehew, QDE
AdviU,tced Forgery Identification by Don Lehew, QDE
JnstiuCtor
2005 School of Forensic Doc1llltent Examination's Annual Confe'r~ition and Cross Examinations by Dr. Richard Frazior, QDE
Medical Problelllll Affecting handwriting by Dr. Richard Frazier, QDE
Legathsues for Document Examiners by Dr. Richard Frazier, QDE
~eposition and Cross Examinations by Dr. Richard Frazier, QDE
Heal'-'1 Factors Affecting Handwriting by Dr. Joe Aloxand«, QDE
PrcsCnption Forgery and Medical Crimes by Diane King
Lecturer
2007 l~ndwr.iting University Annual Conference, Dallas, Texas
T1ainer and Instructor
2007 School;ofForemic Document Examination's Teleclasses
Instructor - Handwriting Basics and Exemplars
Instructor - Multiple Classes on C118() Studies and Examinations
2008 Handwritine Univei-Sity Annual Conference,. Lag Vegai:, Nevada
Trainer and Instiuctor
2009 &:hoot.of Forensic Document Examination's Live Teleclasses
Attended a varii;ty of cla55c;s taught uy Robert Baier, QDE, Police Instructor
2009 Handwriting University Annual Conference, Las Vega~ Nevada
:Critjcal Incident Stress: Statement Analysis and Intervjew v. Interrogation by Faith Wood
Rev 1111113 ,,,
4, ,
F``ic Document Examination Application by Robert Baier,.QDE, Police Instructor
T``in,~r,and Instrllctor for Introduction to Forensic DbcumentBxatnination
. ).':.
20 llCIAL n:NiHNG ·or J.'ACl'S AND CONCLlJSIONS OJ LAW ~ad!....
.JtEGAJlDING.ADOWMENTOR INS'riwMENt
'1J)tPORTING ro·CUA.n A LIEN OR. ttAIM
OittlM·~ day or Novem1Jw, 1013. ·in 1he ahow wtitled aad numblnd QSUM, thie
Court reviewed a moti~ wrified by .mdavit of BUR.TON KAHN and the docunwttarf9n
attacbc:d thereto. Additiomlly, the Comt micwcd die six ~w111111ty Deeds with Vaidor'1
Li.cm,. tttaclied Leretn an11Mu1lib A. B, C, 0. R It P. No teltirnoriy wac ~ ~any pitty.
nor wu lbere any notice ofthc.COW't'a imew. dae Cowl bivina bJlde the detaminati.on thM a
decdioa could be made::iOleJy on review of the doc:umeotation wider 1he aulbority VesltJd Jn 1be
Cc>mt under S~ J. CbllJCcl' SI Dflbc TCXll Govemmczt'Code.
The Coillt fiDdl as. folloWI:· Tue a Wmanty Deeds attached bmCD aa Exhibits A, B, C,
D, Ea. F, z.apectivcty, '1'C NOT c:rcaled by implied or cxpras s:oment or aar=ncnt of the
obli&or, debtor, or~ owner of the maJ praperty or by implied or expl'9ll ~or l&lT.emeut
:of an l8flDl, ~.or othei' ~·of that~ 1111:ldoc;WDCQll 'Mlle prClleDlc4
raiaina ilsUH u to 'Whether corporate documents ware forsed. The Wmnnt)' Deeds with
h~ 1M21 P••• 2107 2lpp
..,
i:ounty i:lesk lhalJ ·ftlt dli1 findlpg offa:t aad conduaion of law md\C umo '1m ofncxml& &1
ihe subject documentitioa or inltrume:ntl··Wf:l't oriainally filed,·IDCI the court di"rec1:1.6iidtiltf.,et~
'1k:ik lo iodox it uing Ibo MmC nunoa that Wllftl llled tn IOdcxlng lhc 1ub.joGt doll``!Ugf~QI;.......:.;
inmumcnt.
·Sipccl on dris _.£_day of.November. 2013.
2
Document Type: JUDICIAL flHDINGS OF FACT8·AHD CONCLUSIONs OF 1../1.W
Pa,e2of2t
·•
CERTl'IE!> COPY~TE STATE OF TEXAS
I, DONNot; KAY M'KINtEv, DEMR-COVNTY DIQTRlcT
CU:RK, t:CRTIP( ffl,tff lHE FOREOOING IS ATRLE
At«J CORRECT~ OF TIE ORiGIW. ~ECORDAS
INDICATEPB'fll£ VOlUME. PAGE AND.COURT Off
IAID DOCUtefT. WITNESSED MY OFFICIAL HAND
.llNDSEAl..Of'OFFICEON THIS:
November 05, 2013
DONNA KAY Mff11C OF F.ACl'S AND COMCL]J8IONS OJl'LAW ``'SP'
ltEGAHDING A DOCl1MENT OR ll'fS'l1llJMEN'J;
Pmh'ORTINC TO CD.A.TIA LIDI OR CUJM
On.thiti~ day or No~'*' 2013, ·in 1he abov. ..,titled and.numblnd--. this
Court reviewed a motl~ verified by aflidaw ofBUR.TON KAHN and tbe documentation.
lt'8Chc:d tbcrdo• .AdditiOmlly, the Court nMcv9'Clli the six "\Vmnnty Deeds with Vendor's
Li.ens11 atbched hereto as as Exlu'\lits A. B. C, D, R It. F. No testimony was t1km &om any ]*'tY.
norwu lbcrc any nodc:e ofthc.COUrt'a review, Ibo COUrt hlvina rmde the detaminstion Ma
dC:ciiion eould be ~.:iolely on.review of the doownmtatiozi under· 1b 8Ulbority vested In the
COm1 under Subchapccr J. CbaPW' n oftbo Texas Govcm.rnent Code.
The Com findS IS follow.: The six Warranty Deeds .uacbed heretO .. Exhibits A. B, c,
D, E .t F, rcspectivc\y, arc NOT c:mted by implied or expraa ament or lgltCinaJI of the
obli&ot. ~or the owner of tbc ml property or by ililplied or expns11 comcot or qiammt
of an agent, 6duciary. ~ othcl' ~'~fthatJICl'IOO, ~·doc:umaila were pcCllCDled
ISveK 11421 Pa•• 2107 21pp
' ..
county c;lerk _.I ·ftlo this fin&IQls of &ct aacl canclusi~ of law in the tame clan of ncotd& M
the lllbjccit docwnmli1ion or insttumena·wae orlainallY filed,·IDd the court di"reclJ~Q``
clcfk &o iadox it ming U.C MD10 ..mos that were u..t 1n fudQlng dlC 1ubje0t doJj~wtill.isl``L-_;
instrumc:m.
Sipod on this ...5:_ day of:Novcmbcr, 2013.
2
Ool;unwint Type; JUDICIM.. FlMDINGS OF FACTS AND CONCLUSIOHs Of LAW
Pagoe 2 of 21
,...
·•
camFIED COP'YCERTIFIOATE Sl"ATE OF TEAAS
I, DoNN4 KAY MCK..1'£\t, IJCxt.R-COUNTY PIBTRloT
CLERlt, CERTIA' THAT 1tte FOREGOINQ IS·A "f K\k
AN> COAAECT cf>Fv OF TI£ OIOOINAL ~ECORD AS
INl)ICATEDSY THe YOlUME, pAGJ: AHo.~roH
IJAIO OOCLM:NT. 'MTNESSED l,fY OFFICIAL HAND
AND 8EA1. OF OFFICE ON n.5;
November 05, 2013
DONNA KAY MCKINNEY.
BnAR COUNTY, TEXAS
tllV 05 2013
'
C... Numbw: 2013Cl18394 Document Type: JUDICIAl. FINDINGS OF FAcTS AND CONCl.USIONS OF LAW
.Pqe 21 of2 l
EXHIBITC
. . -llll J.``~Mlrllf·,
i 20llCI18394 -0224 ·
'------
CAUSE NO. 2013-CI-18394
IN RE; A PURPORTED § IN THE DISTRICT COURT
§
LIEN OR CLAIM AGAINST § BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS
§
HELVETIA ASSET RECOVERY, INC. § 224m JUDICIAL DISTRICT
FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF SANCTIONS
On March 3 and 4, 2014 came to be heard the First Amended Motion for Sanctions filed
by Movants Puerto Verde, Ltd. e'Puerto Verde") and Helvetia Asset Recovery, Inc. (collectively,
"Helvetia") against Respondents Burton Kahn e'Mr. Kahn") and his attorney L. Terry George
("Mr. George") (the "Sanctions Motion"). Mr. Kahn represented himself pro se at this
evidentiary hearing. Mr. George did not appear. 1
The Court, having reviewed the Sanctions Motion, Mr. Kahn's response, testimony and
other evidence presented, including the Temporary Injunction record in Cause
No. 2013-CI-18355, argument from counsel and Mr. Kahn, and having taken judicial notice of
the parties' pleadings and filings in related litigation Cause No. 20 l 3-CI-18355, enters the
following Final Judgment and Order of Sanctions:2
I.
FINDINGS AND CONCLUSlONS
A. Back2round.
1. Helvetia seeks sanctions under ( l) Rule 13 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure;
(2) Chapter 10 of the Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code, Section 51.903 of the Texas
Government Code; and (3) through the Court's inherent power to sanction litigants and their
p
G 1
Reporter's Record. Volume 1 (RR-1). pp. I-Lt
1
RR-2, p. 55.
~-- - ·- -~--,
FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF SANCTIONS I Document ~ Pagel of29
[ scanned_ as filed. J
counsel.3 Section 51.903 pennits, inter alia, an owner of real property to appear before a court
and have the co mt declare as fraudulent an instrument filed of record creating or purporting to
create an interest in real property owned by the movant. The owner/movant "mai' appear ex
4
parte. The reviewing court may not consider testimony or make findings on the merits.
2. The offending pleading that is the subject of the Sanctions Motiuu i!i uu ex ptArle
motion (the "Ex Parte Motion") filed on November 5, 2013 by Mr. Kahn in the name of
Helvetia. 5 This Ex Parle Motion was filed pursuant to Section 51.903 of the Texas Govemment
Code. Mr. George was designated as Mr. Kahn's lead counsel on the Ex Parte Motion. 6 Newly-
retained Jay Petterson in San Antonio ("Mr. Petterson") was designated as "associate attorney,"
and signed the document for Mr. George, who resides in Fort Worth, Texas. 7
3. As described in more detail in this Judgment and Order, the Court finds that
Mr. Kahn and Mr. George committed a fraud on the court and on the Movants for the malicious
purposes of claiming ownership by Kahn of Helvetia, and of clouding legal title to land owned
by Helvetia and sold by Helvetia to a bono fide purchaser for value. One day before the
Respondents filed and presented the Ex Parle Motion, Helvetia had :fi]ed a Petition and
Application for Temporary Restraining Order in Cause No. 2013-CI-18355 seeking to enjoin
Mr. Kahn from interfering with Helvetia's business or holding himself out as an authorized
representative of Helvetia.
3
First Amended Motion for Sanctions, filed January 15, 2014, pp. 5; See also, In re Bennett, 960 S.W.2d 35, 40
(Tex. 1997).
4
TEX. GOV'TCODE §§ 51.901, 51.903.
~See Exhibit I. The pleading was ft1ed in the name of"Helvetia Asset Recovery, Inc." The pleading was captioned
"Motion for Judicial Review ofDocumentatiotl or Instrument purporting to Create a Lien or Claim."
6
Exhihit 1, p. li; RR-4, p. 57.
'id.
FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF SANCTIONS Page 2 of29
4. While Helvetia' s counsel was negotiating with Respondents to secure a hearing
on Helvetia's Application for Temporary Restraining Order, the Respondents secretly filed and
presented the Ex Parte Motion to a Bexar County judge and secured an order (the "Ex Parle
Order") that was then filed in the Bexar County deed records to slander Helvetia's title and cloud
its buyer's title. g Mr. Kal111 had no authority to file a motion on behalf of, or in the name of
Helvetia, and his motion was a totally fictitious pleading filed for the purpose of causing hann to
others. 9
5. Jay Petterson, Mr. George's co-counsel who signed the motion on behalf of
Mr. Kahn and Mr. George, later signed a: Rule 11 Agreement whereby Mr. Kahn promised to
petition the court to set aside the Ex Parte Order. 10 Mr. Kahn later disavowed the Rule 11
agreement, forcing Helvetia to try a lengthy temporary injunction hearing that resulted in a
temporary injunction against Mr. Kahn and an order setting aside the Ex Parte Order, in other
words, accomplishing at great cost what Mr. Kahn had ear1ier promised to do in his Rule 11
agreement. 11
~
I
6. Helvetia was incorporated by Puerto Verde in August 2007. Puerto Verde is a
0 Bahamian corporation and is owned by Robert Ripley ("Mr. Ripley"). 12 Puerto Verde
2
I contributed approximately $1.2 million in cash to capitalize Helvetia in 2007, using the funds to
~ buy Helvetia's 1,000 shares of stock at $1 per share. 13 These 1,000 shares represented the total
~
v0
L s Exhibits I, 2, 15·18; RR-3, pp. 23·27.
4 9
RR-4, p. 32-37; RR-3, p. 27, 101-104.
2 10
0 Rule 11 Agreement, attached as Exhibit B to Motion to Strike Jury Demand, filed January 10, 2014 in Cause No.
1 2013-Cl-18355, a filing of which the Court has taken judicial notice; RR-2, p. 55; RR-4, p. 57.
11
RR-3, pp. 100-105; Exhibit 3.
h 12
13
Defendant's Exhibit 9': See Tcmporory Injunction Reporter's Record, Vol. 2 (T1-RR·2), at pp. 6·8.
3 Defendant's Exhibit 9: Tl·RR·2, pp. 9-20.
~
0 FINA I, JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF SANCTIONS Page 3 of29
14
number of shares authorized by Helvetia's charter and incorporation documents. Helvetia used
this capital contribution in 2007 to acquire 215 real estate lots in the Key Largo subdivision in
San Antonio. 1s Helvetia has already sold many of the lots to homebuilders. 16 Sales of lots began
in 2010, and have increased in subsequent years. 17
7. Hd veti" uppuinleu Mr. Kiihn in 2009 Lo oversee ils lot sales and closings> for
which he received a 3% commission. 18 Mr. Kahn was the company's director and president
from 2009 until Helvetia terminated him in August, 2013. 19 Prior to 2009, Kenneth Moore
served as president and director of Helvetia. 20 Unhappy with his termination, Mr. Kahn set about
to get even. He emptied Helvetia's bank accounts, transferring approximately $300,00021 into
other bank accounts personally owned by Mr. Kahn or his companies.22 He then issued to
himself on September?, 2013. a stock certificate for 1,000 share$ of Helvetia common stock a11d
purported to cancel Helvetia's 2007 offer to sell its stock to Puerto Verde. 23 Next Mr. Kahn
signed and filed a warranty deed in the name of Helvetia that purported to convey the entire Key
'Largo subdivision to Patadiv Corporation ("Paradiv"), a corporation newly formed by
0
·4
I
~
I
14
See Exhibit G attached to Exhibit I {Helvetia Certificate of Fonnation For-Profit Corporation); Defendant's
Exhibit 8: TI-RR-4, p. 33, 34.
2
0
15
Exhibits 20-22, Defendant'~ Exhibit 9: TI-RR-2, pp. 10-20.
a 16
17
Defendant's Exhibit 9:Tl-RR-3, pp. 57-58.
Defendant's ExhiDlt !l: TJ-RR-3, 56-57.
v 18
Defendant's Exhibit 9: Tl-RR-Excerpts, pp. 63-68; Defendant's Exhibit 8: Tl-RR-4, p. 123-124; Defendant's
~ Exhibit 9: TI-RR-3, pp. 57, 6 L
19
Defendant's Exhibit 9: TJ-RR-4, p. 17; TJ-RR-3, p. 43.
4
a
1
:o Defendant's Exhibit 9: Tl-RR·2, pp. 20-26, 33-35; Exhibit 8: 11-RR-4, p, 17.
21
Mr. Kohn testified that "JOO some odd thousand do1Jars" was transferred from Helvetia to his accounts. The
Court's finding is based on this testimony and is not intended to foreclose Helvetia from demonstrating at trial i11
p Cause no. 2013-Cl-18355 that more was in fact transferred into his accounts. RR-3, pp. 43-45.
G 22
Defendant's Exhibit 8: Tl-Rfl-4, pp. 38-42; Defenaant's Exhibit 9: Tl-RR-3, pp. 41-53, RR-3, pp. 38-50.
:i· 23
Defendant's .Exhibit 8: Tl-RR-4, pp. 42-46; Defendant's Exhibit 9: Tl-RR-3, pp. 18-19; Exhibit 4.
,;I
)
f FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER 01' SANCTIONS Page 4 of29
Mr. Kahn. 24 Paradiv paid nothing for Key Largo, and the conveyance included all lots
previously sold by Helvetia to others - lncluding lots which Mr. Kahn had personally clo:.ed a.ud
for which he had received his 3% commission.25 After the conveyance to Paradiv, Mr. Kahn
filed his Ex Parle Motion to invalidate six recent sales made by Helvetia to a builder that
Mr. Kahn also recently sued in a separate lawsuit in Dexar County.26
B. Mr. Kahn's Sophistication.
27
8. Mr. Kahn is well educated, graduating with an engineering degree from M.LT.
He is employed us an engineer, and has owned and op~ated $Cveral engineering companies. 28
9. Mr. Kahn has represented himself pro se in numerous matters, both in district
court and at the appellate level. 29 His "practice" before the courts spans over twenty years,
including multiple cases in Houston and San Antonio. 30 Mr. Kahn is knowledgeable about liens
and the sale ofproperty.31 He knows how to cloud title to property and chill financing needed by
builders. 32 Mr. Kahn studies the law, performs legal research using Loislaw and O'Conner's,
and is adept in using the internet. 33 Mr. Kahn's son is a litigation attorney practicing in
0
4
., 24
Exhibits 7 and 8; Defendant's Exhibit 9: TI-RR-3. pp. 43-46, 55-56; Defendant's Exhibit 8: TI-RR-4, pp. 46-47•
6 52-53.
~
2
sDefendant's Exhibit 8: TI-RR-Excerpts, pp. 47-48, 63-68; Defendant's Exhibit 8: TI-RR-4, p. 52-53, 123-124;
-~ Defendant's Exhibit 9: Tl-RR-3, pp. 59-61.
26
~4
Defendant's Exhibit 8: TJ-RR-Excerpts, pp. 63-68.
27
RR-3, pp. 28-30; Defendant's Exhibit 8: Tl-RR-4, p. 43.
26
Detendant's Exhibit 9: Tl·RR-4, p. 92-93; Exhibit 25, Exhibit 26 (Gillett); Exhibit 6 {Contour). Defendant's
v Exhibit 9: TI-RR-4, pp. 64-65 (Contour).
0 29
RR-3, pp. 28-33, 60-66, 74· 77, 79.
L
30 fd.
4 3
2 ' Id; see also RR-3, pp. 38; RR-4, pp. 57-62; Exhibits 26 and 27.
~
32
Id., :sec 11.lsu, RR.-3, p. 27.
33
RR-3, p. 28-29. Justice Michol O'Connor is a respected author of a series of books relating to litigatiId.
44
v Exhibit 6; see Schedule L, liabilities (lines 16-21); RR-4, p. 40-43, 48.
0 4
~ See Jn re Seminole Walls & Ceiilngs Corp., 446 B.R. 572, 585·86 (M.D. Fla. 2011 (applying Texas law); Yeoman
L v. Galveston City Co., 106 Tex. 389, 167 S.W. 710, 720 (TelC. 1914).
46
4,> Exhibits 4, 5, 21, and 22. "(A] corporation may issue shares for consideration if authorized by the board of
directors of the corporation." TEX. BUS. OROS. Code§ 21. J 57(a); see also, § 21.160. Shares may be issued by
0 ca>h consideration. ld., at§ 21.159(2). When tbe consideration is paid, the shares; are considered to be b5ucd, ll.fld
J. are fully paid and nonassessable. Id., § 21.157. The judgment of either the board of directors, or the shareholder
is conclusive in determining the value and sufficiency of the consideration received for the shares. Jd., § 21.162.
p (emphasis added).
G 47
Defendant's Exhibit 5, including Exhibit 1 attached thereto (Robert Ripley's Affidavit), and Exhibit D attached
i
thereto; Exhibit 19, 20; Defendant's Exhibit 8: Tl-RR-S, pp. 4-6, 8, 18, 21-22. ·
FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER Or SANCTION$ Page 7 of29
Mr. George, who was Mr. Kahn'~ neighbor, to act as incorporator.48 Mr. George prepared
Helvetia's 2007 organizational minutes, which showed that Helvetia issued itsl ,000 shares of
stock to Pue.rto Verde at $1 per share. 49 Puerto Verde wired approximately $1.2 million in cash
in 2007 to capitalize Helvetia in exchange for all its shares, thus enabling Helvetia to purchase
l.hl:.:: Ki,;;y Lfilgu :sub1999 WL 61858, at *8 (Tex. Crim. App. Feb. 9, I 999).
59
Exhibit 11, 12.
60
See also, Pi·imerica Life Ins. Co. v. Atkinson, 2012 WL 6057888, at •4 (W.D. Wash. Dec. 6, 2012) (finding that
Mr. Baggett's letter of opinion "provides no facts, reasoning, or analysis;) Brown v. Primerica life Ins. Ca., No. 02·
FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OJ' SANCTIONS Page 9 of29
17. For example, in Dracz v. American General Life, 426 F. Supp. 2d 1373 (M.D. Ga.
2006), the court struck Mr. Baggett as an expert witness finding his testimony unreliable and his
qualifications "paltry" and not qualified to testify as an expert in the field of handwriting
analysis. 61 In a bench trial in U.S. v. Revels, 1:10-CR-110-l (E.D. TN., May 9, 2012), the court
similarly excluded Mr. Baggett pointing to his "evident deficiencies" as a handwriting expert,
and referred to the Dallas Court of Appeals opinion that embraced a prosecutor's use of the tenn
''charlatan" in reference to Mr. Baggett, which the court defined as a "pretender to medical
62
knowledge: a quack." See Brown v. State of Texas, No. 05w97-00289-CR, 1999 WL 61858, at
"'8 (Tex. Crim. App. App. Feb. 9, 1999). The court in Revels also noted that Mr. Baggett had
received felony convictions for theft and aggravated assault, and a deferred adjudication after
pleading guilty to Tampedng with a Government Record, which stemmed from his failure to
truthfully disclose his criminal history on a government form. Mr. Kahn acknowledged that
legal opinions about Mr. Baggett were publicly available before he filed the Ex Parte Motion,
but he took no steps to investigate Mr. Baggett or his background. 63
18. For these factual and legal reasons, and others already stated, the Court gives no
weight to Mr. Kahn,s persistence that forged or fraudulent documents allowed him to buy
Helvetia's stock. Mr. Kahn's additional complaints about the incorporation of Helvetia in 2007
that he claims entitled him to buy its stock in 2013 also fail, as foJlows.
v
-0 C-8175, USDC, N.D. Illinois, April 29, 2006 (court struck Mr. Baggett's affidavit and excluded his testimony,
L finding his affidavit ··unquestionably inaci,equate to underlie expert testimony; ) Wheelei· v. Olympia Sports Ctr.,
4 Inc., No. 03-265-P-H, 2004 WL 2287759 (D. Me. Oct. 12, · 2004) (cour1 excluded Mr. Baggett noting that
114
COmparing' the handwriting on several documents ... is insufftcient. .. Any individual, with no training or
5
1
experience whatsoever, could 'compare' the handwriting on different documentt llnrl r!';ich :1 cC1ndusion;") Abdin v.
Abdin. 94 Ark. App. 12, 223 S.W.3d 60, 65 (2006).
61
g 62
Exhibit 13.
Exhibit 14.
63
3 RR-3, pp. 87-92; RR-4, p. 94.
2
' FINAL J Uf)GMENT AND ORDER OF SANCTIONS Page 10 of29
19, Mr. Kahn's claim that Puerto Verde did not pay $1,000 to buy the l,000 shares of
HeJvetia's stock is meritJess. 64 A company that pays $1.2 million to capitalize a corporation has
by definition used the first $1,000 of the investment to buy the capital stock, as expressly
provided for by HeJvetia's organizational minutes. 65 In HeJvetia's 2012 tax return, signed by
Mr. Kahn, Fuerto Verde's investment is accounted for as purchasing Helvetia's capital stock for
$1,000, with the remainder of the investment treated by Helvetia as additional paid in capital. 66
Bearing on Mr. Kahn's credibility, Mr. Kahn claimed in Helvetia's 2012 tax: return to own alJ of
Helvetia's stock as ea1·ly as 2012, even though he swore before this Court that he purchased the
67
stock in September 2013, and that nobody owned Helvetia's stock before that time.
20. Mr. Kahn's alternative claim that Puerto Verde's $1.2 million investment was a
"Joan," and not capitalization of Helvetia, ]s baseless. Helvetia's tax return shows that Helvetia
owes no loan or liabi1ity of any nature. 68 Further, Mr. Kahn could not identify any promissory
69
note, deed of trust, or any other typical indicia of indebtedness to support his allegation. In
fact, closing documents on Helvetia's purchase of the Key Largo rea] estate reflect there was no
~I debt. 70
0 21. When the Ex Parte Motion was filed on November 5, 2013, Mr. Kahn was
~2 represented hy legal counsel, including Mr. George. 71 Mr_ Kahn drafted the E."¥: Parle Motion
9.
4
v 64
p 6
}
RR-4, p. 93; RR-3, p. 12.
Exhibit 5.
66
q 67
Exhibit 6; see Schedule L, capital stock account, and additional paid-in capital account (lines 22 and 23).
Id.; RR-3, pp. 48-56; Defendant's Exhibit 8: Tl-RR-4, pp. 41-43.
0 68
1 £xhibit 6; see Schedule L, liabilities (lines 16-21); RR-4, p. 40-43, 48.
69
p Id, see also RR-4, p. 4&.
G 71
>Exhibit 22.
71
3 Exhibit I; RR-4, pp. 55-57; RR-3, pp. 63, 69, 81-82; Defendant's Exhibit 8: Tl-RR-3, pp. 61-62.
~
8 FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF SANCTIONS Page 11 of 29
and directed his lawyers to file it. 72 Without any authority, Mr. Kahn filed the pleading in the
name of Helvetia, and falsely assened his ownership of Helvetia throughout the filing, which he
reiterated in his supporting affidavit. 73 Mr. Kahn's affidavit, containing his allegations of fraud
and forgery against Puerto Verde, was ]ater "massaged" by Mr. Petterson, who Mr. Kahn
retained just days before he filed the Ex Parte Motion. 74
22. In the Ex Parte Motion, Mr. Kahn sought to have six warranty deeds executed by
Helvetia declared invalid. 75 The s~x warranty deeds represented Helvetia' s six sales of lots to a
ho1m::builder in September and October 2013, after it had terminated Mr. Kahn. 76 Mr. Kahn
claimed that because he bought Helvetia's stock on September 7, 2013, after he was terminated,
only he, and not the person signing the deeds, had the authority to sell Helvetia's Jots. 77
23. Mr. Kahn and his attorneys lrnew or should have known that Section 51 of the
Texas Government Code on1y affords the extraordinary remedy of ex parfe relief to "owners" of
real property. 78 Mr. Kahn did not meet this requirement. 79 He did not personally own any of the
six lots, he did not own Helveti~ and he had no relationship with Helvetia at the time the Ex
Parte Motion was filed. 80
71
Id.; RR-4, pp. 55-57; Defendant's E?Chibit I (Attorney Employment Agreement with Mr. Petterson, dated
November I I, 2013, effective November I, 2013).
73
Exhibit I~ .r" also, Mr. Kahn's Affidavii attached as Exhibit I to the Ex Partt1 Motion.
v0 74
RR-4, pp. 55-57; Defendant's Exhibit I.,
75
Exhibit 1, pp. 2-4, §JV.
L 76
Id., s2e also, Exhibits A-F attached to Exhibit I.
4 77
~
Exhibit l; Mr. Kahn's affidavit attad1ed as Exhibit l to Exhibit I.
18
&e Tex. Gov'T CODE ANN. § 51.903. An ubligur or debtor of \he real properly may also bring an action under
these proceedings, but Mr. Kahn sought relief only as an "owner." Mr. Kahn makes no claim that he is either an
p obligor or debtor of the six lots at issue.
G 79
RR-4, pp. 43-46; Exhibits 23 and 24.
sold.
FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER 01' SANCTIONS Page 12 of29
24. Section 51.903 also limits the Court's determination to whether the six warranty
deeds are fraudulent as defined by $ection 51.901, and does not provide for findings by the Court
on the parties' underlying dispute. See TEX. Gov•T CODE ANN. § 51.903(a), (g). See In re
Purported Liens or Claims Against Samshi Homes, L.L.C., 321 S.W.3d 665, 667 (Tex.App.-
Houston [14th Dist] 2010, no pet.); Becker v. Tropic Isles Ass 'n, No. 13-08-00559-CV, 2010
WL 877569, at *3 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi Mar. 11, 2010, pet. denied) (mem. op.); In re Hart,
No. 07-98-0292-CV, 1999 WL 225956, at *2 (Tex.App.-Amarillo Apr. 1S, 1999, no pet.). 81 This
statute was enacted after the Republic of Texas filed hundreds of frivolous Hens against
government officials. 82
25. Due to the extraordinary ex parte nature of the proceedings, Section 51.903 (a) of
the Texas Government Code requires the verified motion recite that the movant is aware that
sanctions will be imposed for a frivolous filing. The Ex Parte Motion contained this recitation. 83
81
Section 5 l.903 was enacted as part of House Bill 1185, passed in 1997. See Act of May 10, 1997, 15th Leg., R.S.,
Ch. 189, § 14, sec. 51.903, 1997 TEX. SESS. LAW. SERV. 1045, 1053 (current version at TEX. GOVT. CODE ANN. §
51.903 (Vernon 2005)).
The Senate's Bill Analysis explains the impetus behind the passage of Bill I I 85, as follows:
Currently, individuals and organizations have begun to take action based on their refusal to
recognize the authority and sovereignty of the government of the State of Texas. These entities
have filed fraudulent judgment liens issued by so-called "common law courts" and fraudulent
documents purporting to create liens or claims on personal and real property with the secretary of
state and many county and district court clerks throughout the state. Many of the filings have been
against the State of Texas and public officers and employees, as well as private individuals. These
filings have clogged the channels of commerce and have amounte-d to harassment and intimidation
of both public officials and ordinary citizens. This bill provides both civil and criminal remedies
for 1hose agafns1 whom such rraudulent filings have been made.... This bill creates an expedited
judicial process that permits someone aggrieved by the fraudulent filing to obtain an expedited
legal process to obtain a court order declaring the filing to be fraudulent. ...
S.ENATE;RESEARCli CTR., BILL ANALYSIS, TF.X. H.B. 1185, 75"' LEG., R.E. (1997) (emphasis added). Thus, llle bill
analysis supports the view that the statule was not created to detennine the legitimacy and validity of the claimed
interest in the property.
82
Texas Attorney General's summary: htU,3://www.tcxa~altomeygcneral.gov/alcrts/alens ykw.j,Jh~?id-114&
3
~ Exhibit I, p. 5.
FINAL JUDGMENT' AND ORDER OF SANCJ"IONS Page 13 of29
.·
into and filed of record their Rule i 11 agreement. 35 The Rule 11 Agreement provided~ among
other things, to set aside the Ex Parte Order by submitting an agreed order to that effect \vithin
seven days. 86
28. On November 22, 2013, Mr. Kahn fired Mr. Petterson and Ms. Goodman and
substituted himself as counsel pro se.e7 Mr. Kahn refused to execute the documents prepared by
Helvetia to effectuate the Rule 11 agreement Mr. Kahn has since asserted in pleadings and
testimony that Helvetia's lawyers either bribed or coerced his lawyers into signing the Rule 11
Agreement. 88 . Though Mr. Kahn claims he did not expressly authorize the signing of the Rule 11
Agreement, the. Court finds no evidence that his attorneys lacked implied or apparent authority to
sign the Rule 11 agreement. The Court finds no evidence to support the claim that opposing
counsel bribed or coerced Mr. Kahn's counsel into signing the Rule 11 agreement.
29. Mr. Kahn created additional delay when he appeared at the resetting of Helvetia' s
Emergency Motion, and its Motion to Enforce Rule 11 Agreement, on November 26, 2013 with
two new 1awyers, seeking a continuance. Judge Peter Sakai granted a continuance, but also
entered a TRO restraining Mr. Kahn from taking any actions on behalf of either Helvetia or
Paradiv, and setting the hearing on the temporary injunction for December 6, 2013. Judge Sakai
found in the TRO that further attempts by Mr. Kahn to claim title to Hclvctin's properties and
85
Defendant's Exhibit&: TT-RR-4, pp. 75, 77, 83-85, 87-90.
86
Pertinent language of the Rule 11 Agreement states:
2. The panies shall execute documents within the next 7 days sufficient to implement the
following:
a. Agreed Order setting aside the judgment of November 5, 2013, in cause 18384.
4
t i
7
b. A complete re/ease and hold harmless by Burton Kahn ... of any claim of
ownership or title to tbe 6 Jors at issue in Cause No. 18394.
Court records do not show that Mr. George was ever discharged from his representation of Mr. Kahn in either this
case or Cause No. J 8355, although the Court discharged him in an least one related action, Cause No. l 7016, with
Mr. Kahn':s llpprovnl.
88
RR-2, p. 53; RR-3, p. 30.
f!NAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF SANCTIONS Page 15 of29
Court had fully adjudicated Helvetia's temporary injunction, its sanctions request, and its request
lo t:nfo1ce the Rule 11 Agreement. Judge Canales declined at that time to make any contempt
findings, but expressly recognized in his order that Mr. Kahn had violated Judge Sakai's TRO,
that he had refused to implement the November 15, 2013 Rule 11 Agreement, and that he and
Mr. George had faik:d tu produce documents or appear for depositions as Judge Sakai had
ordered. Helvetia deposed Mr. Kahn on December 6; Mr. George did not appear for his
deposition though ordered to do so.92
32. Mr. Wachsmuth anQ. Mr. Fanucci represented Mr. Kahn during the three-day
evidentiary hearing that culminated on December 11, 2013 with Judge Karen Pozza granting
Helvetia's application for a Temporary lnjunction enjoining Mr. Kahn from taking further
actions on behalf of Helvetia and Paradiv. 93 Judge Pozza a]so set aside the Ex Parte Order. 94
Mr. Kahn then fired Mr. Wachsmuth and Mr. Fanucci on December 13, 2013, and has since been
prose.
33_ Helvetia set its First Amended Motion for Sanctions for hearing on January 21,
0 2014. Both Mr. Kahn and Mr. George appeared at the Courthouse on January 21 for the
4
I
~/
sanctions hearing. The presiding court assigned all of the parties' pending matters pending in
Cause Nos. 18394 :md 18355 to the Monitoring Court, and all counsel and Mr. Kahn met with
t.
0
the Monitoring Court Clerk about scheduling and resetting the hearings to March 3, 2014.95
a
v
0
L
4
2 92 Id.
0
l 93
Id.; an Amended and Supplementary Temporary Injunction was entered by Judge Pou.a on December 18, 2013
p that expressly permitted Helvetia to continue selling its lots.
94
G Ei.:hibit 3.
95
Id.
3
2
~ FINAL JUOOMENT ANI) ORDER OF SANCTIONS Page 17 of29
II.
ORDER OF SANCTIONS
34. Helvetia has provided evidence that overcomes the general pres\lmption by courts
that pleadings and other papers are filed in good fai1h.
35. As discussed herein, the conduct by Mr. Kahn and Mr. George in failing to
conduct appropriate investigation and due diligence -before filing the Ex Parte Motion, in
delaying efforts by Helvetia to set 1t aside, and in refusing to comply with the Rule 11
Agreement, show that their pleading and their conduct has been groundless, that the pleading
was filed in bad faith and for harassment, that it was filed for an improper purpose> that it lacked
in factual oc legal basis, and was not supported by evidence. These findings are incorporated into
the Court's findings that sanctions are appropriate under Rule 13, Chapter I 0, § 51,903, and
under the Court's inherent power, as described in this order and judgment.
A. Ruth 13, Texas Ru Jes of Civil Procedure
36. Ru1e 13 gives the Court
. I
the option of imposing sanctions on both a party and
counsel for filing a groundless pleading that is either brought in bad faith or brought for the
0
4 purpose of harassment. TEX. R. CJV. P. 13; In re C.M V.• 136 S.W.3d 280, 284 (Tex. App. - San
~-, Antonio 200, no pet.) The rule defines "groundless" as having "no basis in law or fact and not
1
warranted by good faith argument for the extension, modification. or reversal of existing Jaw,"
and thn~ tnrns on the legal merits of a claim. Id.; Robson v. Gilbreath, 267 S.W.3d 401, 405
~L (Tex. App.-Austin 2008, pet. denied). "Bad faith" requires the conscious doing of a wrong for a
dishonest, discriminatory, or malicious purpose. Id., at 407. Improper motive is an essential
.~
2
Q element of had faith. Elkins v. Stotls-Bnmm, 103 S.W.3d 664, 669 (Tex.App.-Dallas 2003, 110
l.
p pet.). Rule 13 also provides, "[S]a:nctions wider this rule may not be imposed except for good
G
3
?
'5 FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER 01' SANCTIONS Page 18 of29
cause, the particulars of which must be stated in the sanction order. 1) See Low v. Remy, 221
S.W.3d 609, 614 (Tex. 2007).
37. Rule 13 pennits the trial court to impose sanctions on attorneys or parties who file
a "fictitious pleading" or "make statements in pleading which they know to be groundless and
false." After notice aud hei:tfing, llu::: Lrial courl "shall impose an appropriate sanction" available
under Rule 215. TEX. R Crv. P. 13.
38. Sanctions available under Rule 215.2(b) include attorney's fees. See TEX. R. Civ.
P. 13, 2 l 5.2(b). Sanctions awarded as attorney's fees fall within the sound discretion of the
Court. Olibas v. Gomez, 242 S.W.3d 527, 535 (Tex. App.-El Paso 2007, pet. denied); Glass v.
Glass, 826 S.W.2d 683, 688 (Tex. App.-Texarkana 1992, writ denied) (citjng Brantley v. Etter,
677 S.W.2d 503, 504 (Tex. 1984)).
39. In detennining whether sanctions are appropriate, the trial court examines the
facts availabJe to the litigant and the circumstances existing when the litigant filed the pleading.
Alejandro v. Bell, 84 S.W.3d 3&3, 392 (Corpus Christi 2002, no pet. h.); Home Owners Funding
Corp. of Am. v. Schepple1', 815 S.W.2d 884, 889 (Tex. App. - Corpus Christi 1991, no writ).
The Court aJso considers the acts or omissions of the represented party or counsel, not merely the
legal merit of a plei:iding OT motion. Griffin Indus. V G1·imes, No. 04-02-00430-CV, 2003 WL
1911993, *4 (San Antonio Apr. 23, 2003, no pet.) (citing New York Underwriters Ins. Co. v.
State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 856 S.W.2d 194, 205 (Tex. App.--Dallas 1993, no writ.).
40. In addition, the Court is entitled to evaluate the credibility of the testimony :md
detennine what weight to give it. Wein v. Sherman, 03-10-00499-CV, 2013 Tex. App. Lexis
10666. at *24 (Tex.App.-Austin Aug. 23, 2013, n.p.h.) (mem. op.) (citing Alpert v. Crain, Caton
& James, P.C., 178 S.W.Jd 398. 412 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2005, pet. denied)).
FINAL JUDGMENT Al>iD ORDER 01' SANCTIONS Page 19 of29
41. The Court has mad~ the necessary factual determinations about the motives and
credibility of Mr. Kahn. The Court finds that sanctions against Mr. Kahn are appropriate under
Rule 13. The Court is precluded from sanctioning Mr. George under a literal reading of this
Rule because his associate attorney, not Mr. George, signed the Ex Parte Motion. Yuen v.
Gerson, 342 S.W.3J 824 (Tt:x. App. - Hou:ston [141h Dist.] 2011, pet. denied).
42. Helvetia has not sought sanctions against the associate attorney, Mr. Petterson.
Although Mr. Petterson signed the offending pleading, Mr. Petterson attempted to rectify the
error within ten days by entering into the Rule 11 Agreemt:nt.
B. The Ex Parle Motion Wa..11 a Fictitious Pleading And is Groundless.
43. The Court finds that the Ex Parle Motion was a fictitious pleading and
groundless, and that it was brought both in bad faith and for harassment. The Ex Parle Motion
has no basis in law or fact, and is not warranted by good faith argument for the extension,
i
modification, or reversal of existing la~.!f6 Mr. Kahn filed the pleading maliciously without any
basjs in fact or law. 97 Mr. Kahn also filed it as an experiment to obtain an opinion of Helvetia
ownership that he could then use to bolster his egregious ownership arguments in this matter.
44. The Court has assessed Mr. Kahn's credibility along with the evidence presented,
and find~ there is not a scintilla of evidence that Mr. Kahn owns Helvetia's stock, and thus finds
the Ex Parte Motion meritless. The Court finds that Mr. Kahn has used this false allegation for
improper purposes, and thus finds good cause in assessing sanctions as further particularized
herein. His wrongful cli!ims nf ownerships were a.t the genesis of all of the proceedings herein,
and spawned the litigation between the parties, unnecessarily causing Helvetia to incur
.1
substantial fees and expenses.
96 RR' of the six lots, and thus to i11terfere and harm
Helvetia's business by Mr. Kahn's c1aim that he owned property that Helvetia had
already sold to builders;
c. To chill Helvetia's future sales of property, as Mr. Kahn acknowledged he knew
v
0
L the litigation wonld m::ike huilclers, lenders and title companies reluctant to close
q
0
l
98
See in re Hart, No. 07-98-0292-CV, 1999 WL 225956, at *2 (Tex. App.-Amarillo Apr. 15, 1999, no pet) (Court
~ declined to address Harts' complaint that§ 51.903 of the Texas Government Code was unconstitutional. citing San
Antonia Gen. Drivers v. Thornton, 156 Tex. 641, 647, 299 S.W.2d 911, 915 (1957), which directs a court not to pass
upon the constitutionality ofa statute if the particular case can be decided upon non-constitutional grounds).
FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF SANCl'IONS Page21 of29
on property sales by Helvetia if they thought Mr. Kallll would record adverse
ownership claims to the property;
d. To attempt to extort revenues earned by Helvetia after it had terminated
Mr. Kahn's employment;
e. To retaliate or .. get even" against his fonner employer.
49. Mr. Kahn acted with duplicity, defrauding the Court as shown herein, and
defrauding HeJvetia.99
50. The timing of Mr. Kahn's filing of the Ex Parte Motion also shows bad faith and
filing for an improper purpose. : Email exchanges show that Helvetia sued Mr. Kahn on
November 4, 2013 for various torts and injunctive relief, and were attempting to coordinate with
Mr. George a time to present to the Court Helvetia's application for a. temporary restraining
order. 100 These types of games with the Court and opposing counsel go to the Court's core
functions, and subject Mr. Kahn and Mr. George to sanctions under the Court's inherent power
to control litigants.
51. Mr. Kahn's pleadings and conduct demonstrate delay when he avoided the
hearing to set aside the Ex Parte Order by agreeing to, and later reneging, on the Rule 11
99
Defondant's: Exhibit 8: Tl-RR-4, pp. 82-83 ("Paradiv doesn't own (the six lots), it is Helvetia. At1d P11radiv was
only- the only reason why I made that transaction (the Ex Parte Motion], was to try to prevent Robert Ripley frorn -
he sold six lots when he wasn't even ... pre~ident of the company.")
100
RR-3. pp. 95-10 l; Rxhibits l 5-18.
Helvetia Asset Recoveiy, Inc. v. Burton Kahn and Paradiv Corporation, filed on November 4, 2013, in the 4071h
Judicial District, Bexar County, Texas.
On November 4, 2013, counsel for Helvetia emalled Mr. Kahn's lawyer, Mr. George, a newly tiled petilion and
application for injunctive relief seeking to enjoin Mr. Kabn from taking funher action on behalf of Helvetia,
referri11g to his attempts to convey Helvetia's property to Paradiv. The email requested that Mr. George provide a
convenient time for a court appearance on November 5 if he intended to conrest Helvetia's request for a temporary
restraining order. Mr. George offered no specifics but noted that Mr. Kahn had engaged a San Antonio attorney, Jay
Petterson, as associate counsel.
FINAL JUDGMENT ANO 0ROER OF SANCTIONS Page 22 of29
Agreement. 101 Further delay occurred on November 26, 2013 when Mr. Kahn and new counsel
dejour sought and obtained a continuance, falsely claiming the new counsel needed to get up to
speed. Mr. Kahn fired those lawyers the same day, showing grounds for the continuance were a
pretext for simply more delay. The refusal by Mr. Kahn and Mr. George to comply with
Ht:lvetia's deposition notices on November 12, 2013, and their outright violation of Judge
Sakai's orders for the same, demonstrate further delay. Mr. Kahn's voluminous pleadings on
December 2, 2013 constitute further materially bad faith conduct and harassment when they set
numerous substantive motions for hearing on the day Judge Sakai set Helvefo1.'s temporary
injunction for hearing. Their continued refusal to present themselves for deposition caused
further delay and unnecessary expense, leading to Judge Canales' December 5, 2013 order to
appear, in which he also expressly stated Mr. Kahn was already in violation of the TRO by his
acts purporting to be on behalf of Helvetia.
52. Mr. Kahn's attempt to trivialize his conduct is not creditable given the unrelenting
efforts he took to keep his fraudulent claim intact on the six lots, through the date Judge Pozza
set it aside on December 8, 2013. Moreover, by failing to release the fraudulent lien after
demand was made by Helvetia, the Court may presume Mr. Kahn had the intent to harm and
defraud Helvetia and others. Mr. Kahn claims he rightfully reneged on the Rule 11 Agreement,
but by doing so he refused Helvetia's demand to release the lien, thus giving rise to such a
presumption of intent. rn 2
v
0
l
4
~ 101
102
RR-3, pp. 101-104.
·.
See Florance v. State, No. 05-08-00984:.CR (Tex. App. - Dallas, Aug. 28, 2009). The Florance Court affirmed a
p
judgment that Florance was guilty, after jury trial, and afti1med his sentence of six months in jail for Florance'~
G failure to release a lien that was ftauduieilt under § 51.901, Tex. Gov't Code, in violation of Tex. Penal Code §
32.49.
FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER 01' SANC'l'[ONS Page 23 of29
53. Mr. Kahn and Mr. George filed the Ex Parle Motion in bad faith, as it
demonstrated a conscious doing of a wrcing for a dishonest and malicious purpose. Their actions
were taken in part to slander title, and to ·make it difficult or impossible for He1vytia to continue
its sales of lots. Their intent to harm Helvetia in this manner showed an improper motive.
Mr. Kahn's testimony demonstrated his subjective state of mind: he knew, and Intended) for the
filing to stop Helvetia from further aot sales. 103
54. Mr. Kahn has openl~ admitted his motivation in filing the Ex Parle Motion was to
interfen:: with Helvetia and to stop further sales of lots. Mr. Kahn is knowledgeable about title
companies and title searches, and ·intended his conduct to chill Helvetia's future sales of its
property. to4
55, Mr. Kahn knew or should have known, by proper investigation, that Mr. Moore's
signature was not forged, and that Mr. Baggett was not reputable and could not reasonably
provide an opinion contrary to Mr. Moore's own testimony.
56. The Court can infer Mr. Kahn was additionally motivated by retaliation or
~ vindication, or part of a strategy to cause Helvetia to expend more fees and costs and drive it to
~
, I
/
the settlement table.
57. Mr. Kahn was moti~ated to claim ownership of Helvetia because after he was
2
0
1 fired, his direct access to all revenues earned by Helvetia from lot sales was cut off.
4
v D. Chapter 10, Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code, and § 51.903, Texas Government Code.
0
l 58. Chapter lO authorizes a court to impose sanctions upon a person, or a party
q represented by the person, where an attorney files a groundless pleading or files a pleading for an
a
1 improper purpose, including to harass. TBX. C1v. PRAC. & REM. CODE §§ 10.001(1-3),
p 103
G RR-3, p. 27.
104
Id.; see also, RR-3, pp. 38; RR-4, pp. 57-62; Exhibit 26 and 27.
f FINAL JUDG\1ENT AND 0RDl~R Of' SANCl'IONS Page 24of29
10.004(a). Each allegation and facti.ial contention in a pleading or motion must have, or be likely
·to l1a.ve, evidi;ntiary support aft..-:r a reasum1bk invi::stigaliun. Id., ;n::e also, Bruvenec v. Flores,
No. 04-11-00444-CV, San Antonio, Mar. 20, 2013, citing Low v. Henry, 221 S.W.3d 609, 614-
15 (Tex. 2007). "A trial court may impose sanctions against a party if the court finds that the
party has failed to comply with this requirement." Bravenec, citing Nolte v. Flournoy, 348
S.W.3d 262, 269 (Tex. App. -Texarkana 201 t, pet. denied).
59. Chapter 10 thus pennits the Court to sanction a party or an attorney for filing
pleadings that lack a reasonable basis in law or fact. See TEX. C1v. PRAC. & REM. CODE §
10.001-.006; Low, 221 S.W.3d at 614. The Court may impose sanctions if the Court finds that
the party has failed to comply 1vith any one of the requirements of Section 10.001 of the Texas
Civil Practices & Remedies Code. TEX. C1v. PRAC. & REM. CODE § 10.004(a); Nolte, 348
S.W.3d at 269.
60. For reasons previously described, and incorporated by reference, sanctions may
be imposed against Mr. Kahn under Chapter 10 of the Texas Civil Practices and Remedies Code.
~
The evidence shows that Mr. Kahn and Mr. George are both culpable and that both should be
6 sanctioned for their conduct but as with Rule 13 the Court is precluded from assessing sanctions
7 against Mr. George.
q 61. More particularly, the Ex Parle Motion was filed for an improper purpose, and it
4
Jacks any evidentiary support as shown herein. Section 51. 903 builds in an award of sanctions if
v
0
L a party seeks a finding not in compliance with the statute; Mr. Kahn and Mr. George orchestrated
~ the hearing to be ex parte despite Helvetia's contemporaneous attempts to secure a hearing on a
~ TRO that would have precluded Mr. Kahn's filing; Mr. Kahn filed the pleading without any
p
G authority; and his ownership claims are neither factually or legally supported.
FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF SANCTIONS Page 25 of29
E. Court's Inherent Power to Sanctions
62. The Court has inherent power to impose sanctions. Assessing sanctions under
this inherent power involves a two-step process: (1) the Court should rely upon the rules and
statutes expressly authorizing sanctions whenever possible, and (2) the Court, applying its
inherent power to impose sanctions, must make factual findings, based on evidence, that the
conduct complained of significantly interfered with the Court's legitimate exerdse of its core
functions. Inherent power to sanction exists where necessary to deter, alleviate, and counteract
bad faith abuse of the judicial process, such as any significant intcrforcncc with the traditional
core functions of the Court. Core functions include hearing evidence, deciding issues of fact
raised by the pleadings, deciding questions of law, rendering final judgments and enforcing
judgments. Core functions also include management of its docket and the issuance and
enforcement of its orders. The CoUrt "may issue orders and, when it deems appropriate, vacate,
rescind, or modify those orders. Lawyers and the litigants do not have such authority." 105 By
doing so they effectively usurp the Court's role and displace the Court as the decision-maker,
-'
thus interfering with a core functiort of the Court.
63. For reasons and findings previously discussed, sanctions are appropriate against
both Defendants under this Court~s inherent powers. Their Ex Parte Motion and ex parte hearing
interfered with most of the Court's core functions. They submitted evidence not allowed by §
51.903; they made arguments and submitted an improper order under§ 51.903 that affected the
Court's decision-making; and they omitted &,_closing to the Court prior proceedings detrimental
to their legal position. Mr. Kahn also ignored the Court's setting aside of the Ex Parte Order,
10
~ Basaldua v. Forest Woods Subdivision, No. 04-11-00716-CV (Tex. App. San Antonio, July 5, 2012 (citing In re
K.A.R., 171S.W.3d705, 715 (Tex. App. - Houston (14th Dist.] 2005, no pet.).
FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER or SANCTIO,NS Page 26 of29
thus attempting to usurp the Court's role, by continuing to assert the same grounds that were
1.:unlained in the order that had been set aside.
64. Both Mr. Kahn and Mr. George are culpable for the groundless Ex Parle Motion,
and their allegations that Mr. Kahn reasonably could have purchased any asset valued over
$1,000,000 for $1,000. The pleading i:s based i;olely un Mr. Kahn'~ alleg'1tiou:s lhat Helvetia had
never issued its stock to Puerto Verde, thereby al1owing him to buy the company, worth over $1
million, for $1,000, and only days after the company had tenninatcd him for misconduct. Both
Mr. Kahn and Mr. George participated in the 2007 incorporation of Helvetia, and Mr; Kahn
additionally participated in the transaction by which Puerto Verde wired $1.2 million in cash to
capitalize Helvetia. Mr. George was the incorporator for Helvetia and prepared its 2007
organizational minutes showing that Puerto Verde would be issued all 1000 shares of Helvetia's
stock at $1 per share. Mr. Kahn testified that he was knowledgeable about property sa]es, and
knew that a cloud on a title generally would preclude a sale of that parcel. He intended for the
F.x Parte Motion to harm Helvetia's sales, which he believed would return the p~rties to "status
0 quo.'' Mr. Kahn drafted the pleading and his affidavit, and ]ocated and hired a handwriting
4
6 expert. At the time that the Ex Parle Motion was filed, Mr. Kahn provided the factual basis for
·~ the claims, and der.ided what legal claims to anert, and the manner in which to assert them, vfa
the Texas Government Code. As ~art of his claim that he owned Helvetia, Mr. Kahn created the
4
new corporation Paradiv. to which he had tried to convey all of Helvetia is property in Key Largo
v
0 only days and weeks before he filed the Ex Parle Motion that sought to invalidate legitimate
t
4 sales closed by Helvetia after it had terminated Mr. Kahn.
~ 65. Mr. George did not sign the Ex Parle Motion, but delegated that task to the newly
retained local counsel Mr. Petterson. Emails on November 4 and 5. 2013 show that Helvetia's
FrNAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER Of SANCTIONS Page 27 of29
counsel was unaware of Mr. Petterson's representation until the day the Ex Parte Motion was
filed, November 5. After ignoring orders by Judge Sakai and Judge Canales to appear for his
deposition, Mr. George voluntarilyiappeared at the December 2013 hearing before Judge Pozza
to provide testimony during Mr. Kahn's presentation of his case. Nothing in the evidence shows
that Mr. Ot:urge disavowed the Pane Motion.
66. Mr. George had notice of the sanctions motion and hearing set for March 3, 2014.
He appeared on January 21, 2014, a previous setting, and participated in the monitoring court's
reset of the hearing to March 3, 2014.io6
F. Sanctions are Just and Not Excessive
67. The Court has carefully examined the two-part test adopted by the Texas Supreme
Court in finding that the sanctions assessed arc just. First, there is a direct nexus among the
offensive conduct, the offender, and the sanction imposed, in that the sanction is directed against
the abuse and toward remedying th~ prejudice caused the innocent party.
68. Second, the sanction is not excessive because it is no more severe than necessary
0 to satisfy its legitimate purposes, here, namely, to deter other litigants from simi]ar misconduct
4
62 and punish violators. 107
'! Accordingly, it is herehy ORDERED, ADJUSTED AND DECREED as foJlows:
~ (l) Sanctions be and hereby are awarded against Burton Kahn and Terry George,
jointly and severally, in the amount of $253,416.00, for which let execution issue. Of this sum,
the Court finds $153.416.00 to be rea~onahle attorneys' fees incurred by Movants as a direct and
proximate result of the fictitious filings and the attempted withdrawal of the Rule 11 agreement.
106
RR-4, pp. 54-55.
107
£xhibits 29 and 30.
3,
2
8
5 FINAL JUDGMENT AND 0RDl:R OF' SANC1'10NS Page 28 of29
The remaining $100,000.00 is imposed as sanctions for lack of diligence into the facts and the
law.
(2) All other relief not expressly granted hereby is denied. The Court's intent is that
this instrument be in all things a Final Judgment and Order.
SIGNED, ORDERED, and ENTERED this/ .t_;da f ~ , 2014.
~
Submitted by:
HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP
Isl Werner A. Powers
Werner A. Powers
,.
a State Bar No. 16218800
Natalie DuBosc
State Bar No. 24077481
-~ 2323 Victory Avenue, Suite 700
I Dallas, Texas 75219
bl Telephone: (214) 651-5000
Telecopier: (214) 651-5940
ll
~ Lisa S. Barkley
L State Bar No. 17851450
112 E. Pecan, Suite 1200
4 San Antonio, Texas 78205
2 Telephone No.: (210) 978-7427
0
1 Telecopier No.: (210) 554-0427
p ATTORNEYSFO:R
G
HELVETIA ASSET RECOVERY, INC.
3
~
8
G F!NALJUDGMENT AND ORDER OF SANCrlONS Page29of29
EXHIBITD
~: iAtt~J'r.ie'j_ ;,E.r!l~.1.oyni~11~·!J.9.r!lernent, ir9;ri\ i\i'h!i,``·;si!l\i.!!'tl~ncttl,i;)•pu:'.':1·!_!11.1t~· o, . .t.t~';~JMni{ save,,,. F
.... ................. ................. .....................-+1•
· .~hQih``i~on§.9!i#nt: i
. 'ig'.ri\¥Sf\1l)!S;~e'rhih'i Eiu~op;
,JUiJ:~.f!i'ct&~.~ . ~ p~t-:'Q.ur re,.qile~tfJt!}\i!! •a)ti:idteC! ll:ie•Attt'i.rniiY.Em~ ~rifontAgre ement.bet.Ween•Jafair~ yo~fselt lf ram be r advice and consultation, appearances athearings) trials;
mecH~tic;m, if req\1ired by tJ::r~c.cmtrt, telepliqµe ·~qnferenc¢s, travel, investigative. work, legal
resear~h, r~view:of material receivea ftom a,U ScrQtces, drafting of pieadings::(necessary court
·documep.ts) and co\lrl proceedii1gs and.roi;inal disco.very, attendance at depositions~ subpoenas,
n:nd:othcr n9Ccss.acy pre.pfll'21.ti~n ari:d ``tiOns'to resolvc:i,Youi claiiu:s wiU1:re~pt:l;L tu ownership of
·corporations and ei;iti~ieS relatingto d~velqpment and-holding ofrefil estate and o'Wnership ofreal
estate, including but not liµi:ited to Roperl).Qpley,-John Ripley; Puerte Verde, Ltd., ACSBLDR,
INC., Joabert Development Company; an4 any other person. or entitytelati.rig·to the issues
.relating to ei:nployrnent ofa'ttoi:ney, ·
: i
\..__j
BurtonJ<.ahn:atl:omey employmeI).ta:greement"' page I
T}iiS· cigreement.does·not include presentatiOn· ofthis case tociny appellate court or
pr.eprira#o.n: of111oiio"';J$ qncm¢ry to "ihi~·~¢pf'esei1tatio11' ff qppeai is necessaty, clicfrit and
attot::neywill c.ons.idef. th~ qppeq{@ cf separate ati'd·distiilct catiie .le:yrfor tQ :$.lingJii'elawsul~ furihe~, I may require an ru;klitiorial
retainer; 1will bill, y9u on a ~(>n~h;J.y:9r 91:het pcdodio, ha.sis ·an:d in the eventth.at I require an
additiorialretainer,. lwill, a,dvj§eyqu~:1fJ,:9wever., aJrial pfthismatter is t~tii.i:ed,I may require an
adtiltio.rial 'retainer which shall ~e. pai4 a~ l~cwt ten'd~ys prior ~Q fyio:l.
You liave retained Kathleen Cassidy Goodman as yo.uraflorneyprior /() retai1iing me,
.and. it is.: 1t1iiit:rsto.fldthflt'.M$; .odnuzn:aitd fmay, a.ssociate as co-cf!~nsel on the issues Jo.r ·
which you·are reta._it#,,.gnre. iY~li. ac:kiit>.w#!age titatMs. GoO.dnian.referredyQuto mewitlz
respect (o my r~present(l0t>IZ ofy~u., f()u':h?i``$ignii,d,ti.separate attorney employment
agreement wiJ/i Ms. GooiJinan and und~rstan.ds.he»f!illbe bi/iliigyou sepatdtely. You
0 ·tiilthorize tlie associa'tion, ofMs. Gt?o.lfman and mys¢/ft1$· co;.cou.nsel 01i ih,e matters·c:overed by
,this 'iittorney agreement ·.·
F'.ilrt.lier,yQ.µ. authtn·izf!:.ine'tinissociO.te another.attorney or (lftorneys as! deem
approprJa_te,,anil-advlsable'tn)iourtef!r.esentation..
Yol+ pave,als() to G.OIDP,lY'~th ?11 of the-firm's reasonable requests in connection with the
prep;;i.ratlo}'.\ and presen,ti\tj.Qn ofyoµr cas¢.
While your concem fol' the cos~s iuvdlved'°is v.ertainly ii:lPpreciated you must understand
that iris impossible to predict acclI(at~ly all ~at will b impo;:;i:iil;Jle to pri:di ef~ately the 1:otalamount
of the· foe for·J>rofessionafserVices or'other costs tP&t.111~Y be fo.volv~d i:i;i. repre.se)lting your
interests. In this regard, it.is fa.itthat you be cautioned at the outset t}iat.so111etim~s (and 11ot
infrequently). complexities develop hi.areas where they are not expected ~ya·client. Sometimes
becaus¢ of extrem¢ bitterness aridhurt..feelirtgs~.·or because ofsubstantial properly interests, family
law ~a:ses· become unreasonably time-eonsummg-. this :fitm 'ha.:i made no ·express odmplied
repr_esematio.ns or guarante·es con~erning:th~ outcome of your .case or hc;>w :tong your case wm take
to complete~
1 do n,ot nicke,l'~cl..Qime·,a.:file for expenses, and as: such l do not bill forlong,.distance
calls, ·copying "~ if :unde~ 50 copi~$"per task; basic postage .(this excludes expedited postage
\_ ) services or bu1kpostage) 1 or ni,ii~ape orpar'ldng.
Burton Kahn attorney .en1pioymen1: agrt;t::1Ilent..., .page Z
,..
. ~·, ·~·
,..-".I
(. Just as yo:U:m-e:·de_p~n&ng on my'cxpcrusc 'aiid professioiuilism, TWill "ciepel.ld on you to
k~ep fa;ith Witli m.~ if::c.ornpl~xHi~!1 d¢y~fop jrt y_oi1i'.ifa$8. °i:Vhere'yoi.1 di~.f botexpecnhem. Yn1rr
contip.u,in,gJai~h.m this,fi+m. 4u.tii1g;what roi:gh.t :b~come-'a profouged'.:petiod is vitaily.irhportantto
'the maintinan~ ~fyoµr 1``~ ,rigiitstits: h1iporian~e simply· ca,rillotbe;·over.:ern.phasized~
Conversatiop~ 1Je!wee.n,. ~ ~tto_111ey Md. cUAAtare·prntectedby law and by the disciplinary
rules to·which attorneys' are. StlbJ``t. TJ:ie reaso:i;i: {Qr t}tls·confi'qentiaHty pr()tection.is that .th~
experience ofriia.ny:hundreds of.years. lla.s ,p:r~ve4·~t the in~er~ts o(the ¢.lleht.are be~st se:rve4
when the client's attorneys are f\lllyifuformed of'. all't\l~,facts· w~llin advance _of any p_ossib1e
contest Your candor w:fiLassistmetremendously:in repres.entin,gyoµ;.Jt is (foubJY p~teeted by
lEJ.W a,n4 tb,e discipillittry' f.l.lies and..is V.efy:muoh en:cotiro:ged. You can .rely o~ me· to be ~c;l~d, \Yi.th
you, asweiL
lwitl 00. my·"Qest-fu. k~pyouJ~dvised on lioYi"fhe·ease seems tO be progressing; based on
in.formation.I repeiye ti,"o:tn tt,l~ :~ourt, :from tl;ib othc:r side, and from you. I \vill send you ,(;opies of
all,pleadiqgs foi: y9w::iD;f9rm.ation.
I will do-evefything possit;Jl~to ~xp~dite th~ ~pprop,ri~te disposition of your case consistent
with the tillie limitations iniposed by law and tJ:ie pro't~tion of.ym.rrpresent and. future legal
i:nt.e:r``ts. There.ur 0 bligaiiqrunindcx: 9ur agrccrrient wfll be grounds- for ihe firm·~
withdrawafftom youfrepresentation. We. ~ve:,~gi;eed~ ¢at :tqese provisfons are: fair because our
effort; to be;successfcif,;must be the product ofour teamwork
0
The Texas S.upreme·CcJurt:filid Colirls ofAppeaj~- }lave .adopt~ the Texas tawyer's Creed
as: a triai:tdate' to the legal ptofessiOn"ln texas~ The creedl'equires o:ur firm to advise: you ofthe
~ontents of the .cr~ed Wheri, Jlndertak:irtg to· represe'ilt')iou;. A copy of :th~ Texas Lawyer's Creed· is
attached to this.'ernpl9ym~t agre¢ment for your teview.
The T~xas Goverom:ent Coae::requires:that you be adv!sedthat the State Sar ofT~)Cas
investigates·an4 prose«~Ut~s prof¢ssfonfil :misconductco:romitted by Texas attorneys. Althoµghnot
~very complaint ~g~ix:isfonli~pU:ie ~Ut:a fay;;y~ .hi.volves,.ptofess.ional.fuiScoriduct,. the State Bar
will provide yow with infpr;m~o.nif you ~all 1-800-932~19.00.
You hereby agree that; lfyqu shou.ld at a.nytim~ qecorne displeased or dissatisfied With
any aspectwhatSoever ·ofthis fiinl's:legal r()pi:eseri.tati~n,. orifyou should at any time have any
serious question concerning that•repres~µtation, yot;t·Will immed~at~ly notifY me of that fact in
i , Writing_ by certified mail; return r.eceip(re.qu~sted,. ·
'~/
Burton Kahn.attorney e111ployme1it·agrwment-. page 3
•
,..
You. ~gr`` ·th~t.~s f?.rm. i.:¢sette~'~e#ghUn for: ~yofH1e ~<;)ilowip:g re!)SQns:
1. Your:fai1urdo. cooperat~ auilcomply fLillY··~tli any·rt;asona'ble requestofihis
ftnrt's about your ca.Se; ·
;4, Yotll':engaging:in conduct or making statefueiitS that render itunreaspnably·
d,iff'ic;;\llt for tlils, ~ fo :cartJ;9:ut ih~.p:tupos¢s of its,,empfoyment;:
.~. Your in:sistin1nllli!ftbls'fiffil. ®g~gein cond\ictthatts contrary to my judgment anQ
advic.c;
4. Y Qur failure to .pay;fe~s iµid costs ~ ptqv~ded in this -agreenieht.
5. Jfi.il my-discretion;J deem. it:appropriqt<:l to withdtfl.w fi'.omyotir:representation iri
favor of:substitute couhsel. ' '
This fuiu is privilc;ged tq: hav~: thfa opportunity to be of ser\iice tc> you. I appreciate your
trust and-confi9.ence;.as ·well as:yout business;; lfyou climpfotely approve this agreement, please
dat.e and sign the otigitlaj of~: letj:~t wh¢r¢ indicate~ retili'ri it .to this: office; and retain·ihe
enclosed copy'for your file;
CJ
fi·
ACCEPTED AND AGREEDTO EFFECTIVE'"''U'I')..-.... .1.u.in
. .. ' .·. - ' . . /'M:-'V.··.·."/'.J
. , ·.TON '.KAHN;; 1~dividually ~d as
Qqrporiition and
Presid~IJ,t ofJ.>aiaqiv
Helvetia Asset Recovery•. Inq~
Burt<.>li Ka.bii attorney· employment l;lgr~ement-pag~ 4
EXHIBIT E
Documents provided by www.Loislaw.com http://estore.loislaw.com/LLdocmanager.aspx?action=:tvl
Texas Statutes
---------------------------------------------·--------···-·
CJ Texas Statutes
CJ GOVERNMENT CODE
0 TITLE 2. JUDICIAL BRANCH
CJ SUBTITLE D. JUDICIAL PERSONNEL AND OFFICIALS
CJ CHAPTER 51. CLERKS
CJ SUBCHAPTER J. CERTAIN FRAUDULENT RECORDS OR DOCUMENTS
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----···-··-··················.
? 51.903 GOV'T. Action on Fraudulent Lien on Property
(a) A person who is the purport~d debtor or obliger or who owns real or
personal property or an interest in real or personal property and who has
reason to believe that the document purporting to create a lien or a
claim against the real or personal property or an interest in the real or
personal property previously filed or submitted for filing and recording
is fraudulent may complete and file with the district clerk a motion,
verified by affidavit by a completed form for ordinary certificate of
acknowledgment, of the same type described by Section 121.007, Civil
Practice and Remedies Code, that contains, at a minimum, the information
in the following suggested form:
MISC. DOCKET NO.
In the Judicial District
In Re: A Purported In and For
Lien or Claim Against County, Texas
(Name of Purported
Debtor)
Motion for Judicial Review of Documentation or Instrument
Purporting to Create a Lien or Claim
Now Comes (nam.e) and file.5 this motion requesting a judicial
determination of the status of documentation or an instrument purporting
to create an interest in real or personal property or ? lien or claim on
real or personal property or an interest in real or personal property
filed in the office of the Clerk of (county name) County, Texas, and in
support of the motion would show the court as follows:
I.
(Name), movant herein, is the ·purported obligor or debtor or person who
owns the real or personal property or the interest in real or personal
property described in the documentation or instrument.
I I.
On (date), in the exercise of the county clerk's official duties as
County Clerk of (county name) County, Texas, the county clerk received
and filed and recorded the ctocumentation or in~trument attached hereto
l of S 4/10/2014 1047 AlVf
Documents provided by www.Loislaw.com http://estore.loislaw.com/LLdocmanager.aspx?action=M
and containing (number) pages. Said documentation or instrument purports
to have created a lien on real or personal property or an interest in
real or personal property against one (name of purported debtor) .
III.
Movant alleges that the documentation or instrument attached hereto is
fraudulent, as defined by Section 51.901 (c) (2), Government Code,
and that the documentation or instrument should therefore not be accorded
lien status.
IV.
Movant attests that assertions herein are true and correct.
v.
Movant does not request the court to make a finding as to any
underlying claim of the parties involved and acknowledges that this
motion does not seek to invalidate a legitimate lien. Movant further
acknowledges that movant may be ~ubject to sanctions, as provided by
Chapter 10, Civil Practice and Remedies Code, if this motion is
determined to be frivolous.
PRAYER
Movant requests the court to review the attached documentation or
instrument and enter an order determining whether it should be accorded
lien status, together with such other orders as the court deems
appropriate.
Respectfully submitted,
(Signature and typed name and
address)
(b) The completed form for ordinary certificate of acknowledgment, of
the same type described by Section 121.007, Civil Practice and Remedies
Code, must be as follows:
AFFIDAVIT
THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF
BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, personally appeared
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ , who, being by me duly sworn, deposed as follows:
"My name is _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I am over 21 years of age, of sound
mind, with personal knowledge of the following facts, and fully competent
to testify.
I further attest that the assertions contained in the accompanying
motion are true and correct."
Further affiant sayeth not.
2 of S 4/10/2014 10:47 AM
Documents provided by www.Loislaw.com httP://estore.loislaw.com/LLdocmanager.aspx?action=M
SUBSCRIBED and SWORN TO before me,
this ___ day of
----'----
NOTARY PUBLIC, State of Texas
Nota,ry's printed name:
My commission expires:
(c) A motion under this section i:nay be ruled on by a district judge
having jurisdiction over real property matters in the county where the
subject documen,t was filed. The court's finding may be made solely on a
review of the documentation or instrument attached to the motion and
without hearing any testimonial evidence. The court's review may be made
ex parte without delay or notice of any kind. An appellate court shall
expedite review of a court's finding under this section.
(d) The district clerk may not ~ollect a filing fee for filing a
motion under this section,
(e) After reviewing the documentation or instrument attached to a
motion under this section, the district judge shall enter an appropriate
finding of fact and conclusion of law, which must be filed and indexed in
the same class of records in which the Subject documentation or
instrument was originally filed. A copy of the finding of fact and
conclusion of law shall be sent, by first class mail, to the movant and
to the person who filed the fraudulent lien or claim at the last known
address of each person within seven days of the date that the finding of
fact and conciusion of law is issued by the judge.
(f) The county clerk may not collect a fee for filing a district
judge's finding of fact and conclusion of law under this section.
(g) A suggested form order appropriate to comply with this section is
as follows:
MISC. DOCKET NO. In
the Judicial District In Re: A Purported In
and For _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Lien or Claim Against
County, Texas (Name of Purported Debtor)
Judicial Finding of Fact and Conclusion of Law Regarding a
Documentation or Instrument Purporting to Create a Lien or Claim
On the (number) day of (month), (year) , in the above entitled and
numbered cause, this court reviewed a motion, verified by affidavit, of
(name) and the documentation or instrument attached thereto. No testimony
was taken from any party, nor was there any notice of the court's
review, the court having made the determination that a decision could be
made solely on review of the documentation or instrument under the
authority vested in the court under Subchapter J~ Chapter 51, Government
Code.
The court finds as follows (only an item checked and initialed is
a valid court ruling):
3 of 5 4/10/2014 10:47 Al\!f
Documents provided by www.Loislaw.com http://estore.loislaw.com/LLdocmanager.aspx?action=M
The documentation or instrument attached to the motion herein
IS asserted against real or personal property or an interest in real or
personal property and:
(1) IS provided for by specific state or federal statutes or
constitutional provisions;
(2) IS created by implied or express cohsent or agre~ment of the
obligor, debtor, or the owner of the real or personal property or an
interest in the real or personal property, if required under the laws of
this state, or by consent of an agent, fiduciary, or other representative
of that person; or
(3) IS an equitable, constructive, or other li~n imposed by a court of
competent jurisdiction created or established under the constitution or
laws of this state or of the United States.
The documentation or instrument attached to the motion
herein:
(1) IS NOT provided for by specific state or federal statutes or
constitutional provisions;
(2) IS NOT created by implied or express consent or agreement of the
obligor, debtor, or the owner of the real or personal property or an
interest in the real or personal property, if required under the law of
this state or by imp.lied or express consent or agreement of an agent,
fiduciary, or other representative of that person;
(3) IS NOT an equitable, constructive, or other lien imposed by a court
of competent jurisdiction created by or e~tablished under the
constitution or laws of this state or the United States; or
(4) IS NOT asserted against re~l or personal property or an interest in
real or personal property. There is no valid lien or claim created by
this documentation or instrument.
This court makes no finding as to any und~rlying claims of the parties
involved, and expressly limits its finding of fact and conclusion of law
to the review of a ministerial act. The county clerk shall file this
finding of fact and conclusion of law in the same class of records as the
subject documentation or instrument was originally filed, and the court
directs the county clerk to index it tising the same names that were used
in indexing the subject documentation or instrument.
SIGNED ON THIS THE DAY OF
DISTRICT JUDGE
JUDICIAL DISTRICT
COUNTY, TEXAS
Added by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 189, 14, eff. May 21, 1997.
Copyright? 2013 CCH Incorporated or its affiliates
4 of 5 4/10/2014 10:47 Alv[
EXHIBITF
IEXHIBITT
.)
~ ~ 1iUe of San J\rar,,run, Inc.
306 w. SUnset. Sliite 115
San Antonio, iX 78209
Phone210-198-l643 Fax21o--7ll8-164S
Wt~NG INSTRUCTIONS
Augt.1$l 21 •.2007
I
"'\: =
RE: Order No.: 1210001428
BuyerJBouower(s): Helvetia Asset Recovery Inc.
3i::l!m(&); M~fi: Duith Holding LTD,
Property AW:Jress: .,TX
• In conriection with the refeteru;eQ tr~n, please w~ ful'ld3 to Os in this manner:
WIREIAANSFER INSTRUCTIONS
for Wiring to Settlement Agent
Sank Name: Compass Bank (Sunset Office}
Bank Location: P.O. Box 4444, Houston, 'TX 77210~4444
-\ ASA Number: 113010547
__ / !
ACCount Number: 13880050
Account Name: Escrow Account
LandAmerica lawyers Title of San Antonio
306 W. Sunset, Suite 115
San Antonio, TX 78209
210-826-1504
Re: Gf #1218001426
-Ottler No. lt1S00142!1
'ffrir>g lti!drulllrotJS
(_)
Exhibit~
•
EXHIBITG
. ' . .. . ..·
.. •4,
'
•.
: .
• •••
._. •.
\ . .....
. ~ ~ . \..
. :·.. ···J . \ .. ·.. ::: ·.''. . `` ..-- :.~ :'·;·:_.;.>... ··."·.:..
...... _.·.:. ·. ·.: '. '-.: .. ··.: .: .. ::·,·.i·-."··
·- .... ___ . --- -,___ .. ___ ,. __ .... •..... J
-- ·-· ...--1 EXHIBIT"C"
-t``
i1 --"-·-"``'-----
i.-------
EXHIBITH
I n====·=·====================================n' I
I II . 11, I
I. II I!. I
I
1'
II
II
COMMON STOCK CERTIFICATE II I
II I
I II II I
I II II· I
I :: THIS CERTIFIES THAT :: I
I·
1·11· ~
~ 11,
I
I I I II I
I I! . II I l
I II ISTHE OWNER OF FULLY PAID 1000 SHARES AUTHORIZED OF COMMON STOCK IN REGARDING II I
I 11 11. I
I I ll I I
II II
:. II
II
HELVETIA ASSET RECOVERY INC.
-------------------------------
Ii::
H
: . II THE CORPORATION IS ORGANIZED UNDER THE LAWS OF STATE OF TEXAS 11 :
I II II I
I I II I
I II
I I AT SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS II l
: II //. ~/ . II :
I II PRESIDENT SIGNATURE _,. . DIRECTOR SIGNATURE / /~ II, I
I II $t1/2r~ ?::i:J~ `` 'ii#,(/ 11
• I
I 11 f II l
~======================================~
. l I
I L-------------------------~---------------~
i
l ·. .
LJ /~., ( (
EXHIBIT J
•
_il \J& ~faT CJi·
r1 t``· ~. T· r 1~\_~· · ·
fJ(/ lJ~Q]'" 1lt·
f. 11 /(i'i? ~z;rl``'.~[;yi' /' ~- r·
..
;
·!
.j
t
l
l
I)
·i
I
I
.I
.\
l \
·)
.. :: ..· ..
}/~
• / .·· '',,:
··-_;.:..
:.··
/~--.
t~·<...:.~·:/"
l . .' i
~. ~ .
•
...~ ~ .- ;z
. - -',., -.-· . .. , ,., . . .. . · · , _ ~i August B, 2-001 ~JrH?: . :~ I
,~(:~ir~
:··( ~)':;:;~ .
·.
• : ~ ;·· `` ·, +
~: ·1.; .~; ~:f
. :·.'•i
,; 'i;.· ..·,
:: "''.'l
.' ~-~ )' ~
EhclO~cl;``t,b.e;_i``p~e~l;:I!yla,w$ of:t&;GQrpqra.tiqn,. -``ca~of J;l<;>rqi~tlonis. -~R
<:>"'-peetecl``,_ •'th.~ '$,c!;:rd:k;y O:f:~ ~f~:::L'
··,... '.•:
P1¢a!ierevicw t'lwsed®um~fil't$!~fully~ and:call me:iinmediately: ify.ouha.veany
qv.esuo:r;is,.addiiions.. deil?t!ons,.or ``;, •Mttir mi; ``'Wh~sfu.Jv:etm~reVicwect a:mf
approved, plemi~·qtll.m~:to; ~tu:p.ii;tiP.ieto ,~e~ m~ pdgi~lsL
••
.th~.·s~=:~ia:a:~i:``~::ac~!:J::.!'r~:~:s:~:!i:````red.by;.
Certificate ()f F!lnriati!'i1l. estaJiU-sµ~-~ Qqrp``·~,``; qut its ``()11mt:sb:µcture;
(P:riQr fu: the'·t~xa~ I.Jcisfue~Oi:ganizatl9ns·Code:whi:ch b~ame·effective on January J. 2006, the
-Ccrti:fica~ '<;lfFor~ati,v~d~ ~ By~awa•nmy be
I.hav~ prepa:t~d ~ enc!Qs_ed.~s .based upon info~on anii·,instrup'l:fon.<> you
am•
fl).'0'.\r,ld~L 1 n.tftm:iq.:;fiaye;p,t)~ ~e~t.ei:iW h@l4.;rn:Y,$.rl{~9q! tQ ~e ~ lfiX e`` ·r:91,1 sA-0~
beg.w~e·~. .(()r,tllmll)ll;;Q.fthis,COtpQia~Qn•may affectyour fufure·tax.~obligations. You: should
~ar=~:.~1Z:h!1tii:~r!~it```` ~:::wit~·yo11r:Hr#~11nfant,p:iy}nesv~eial ~ttAoonn
::!~===``==r:y
on rnrpornt~. 1'nt';i:1m'1;. Rl~d~nn of Snhilmpt~i S si:J:1fm::: is. mHoe:hy. illing. 11:orm 7.S5~ with th~
1t1terruil Revenue service-: F~mf2:S5J'liltiStbeJi1ed ·within sewufy--.five:(-75}days nfthe .
',.:
rr;·-.~:
·E-::~-i``~:::::::::=.t:``~ "``1~
'.:"
; : : ;, ''.~ y'
. ~'
f``~,``1- .
......~:. ... ! ;
~.1.:1 •••• k~
•
:~r;-.;~·:1
. ';· ;l``-``
. . :...~.' :
:i:t?~·~d.
~:~:``'
·.:·.::;:``
\:• ••,·.<
:&mpl~Y:erld.entrn~ti:t.in, Nlt~b:er, ltth~:C.rupora.tionwillb¢J'~fingwages to · t,-'1 •• .,,,_:
employ®~J'Ol-1, m.tts.t ~pplyto-1l'w ~al R:e,y~ue;:S.~rv~ 011 F.onn SS'-4 for an El,nployer
Irus,ntifioa~nNUnihev; ·· · ·
Liability &r::Nbnpilym~t l)f.FrCATttii'.es an:a.FmtalW."lthhoiilfugTaxes~ Ji·the ·
.df1;:~ ::S~ii````~::ant``````=~:~:; :r:``~e~l!~J:f````te
6 1
pa.``f Qfsu.~l:lw~ 1ll~Y -~!} f~lllld,:'.li~b,l~i, ·
Fr~nchi~c Tu. Withiitnited extieptions/t'~xascorporatiohl! are·silhject tothe:Texas-
``!``~::Opl• 3
..,c.
::: ::'~.
-i. --~.;;
. ;·
... ... : :
•• ;
~
'IC
•
----- - -
i
( '% :th~:::shat:eholc;I``s 1'.1'.1µ$1:wtbe~owm~ ~{tll¢(p,(Qpycy,oft;b,e CqrPQratiQn. 'Yoµ~hoold:at
, atLtimes'd~ htismess'tmdet,the Cotpnm'fion:name cxaclly'rurspecrued ilitheArticles of
.(jl'``tifoi.ii.nd. :ru:it.:~vi~te``lrottijful``::an.aj:!-pw~a-i~Um4i:l'ti~:¢erti:ficate·hrui been
filed. ..,
·~ .; .. ·.!
....::`` t
l)``k:A``"-~i'.l~ iin_4'4```` Xo'!l:lt~"~ 9h``AA>¥<:~6 &'J,(:itjl'?otyct1r
compLu.iy;niµn.e, ~ylq~ l){````tiYiti``shpµt!f ·``,cpn¢u9te9- ~th~ cQ111p~y$mut'1¢.;
``tr:;:;;``v:t``~et~·_:Eilleti;i~4i!i````u````:!``::!1``:``~fue
petsonally} }'-Oii shoUld havectlieab~v.e,acti-Oh'app~dv~Efhy .~Board ~£Directors ~d :refle~t the
.
``~:ft!~i}D+J1pvroprfaie1;y draftedr~solutlon wh1~h'1s ~Gn~cl !utojh¢. co1UPanfs triinute,bQok
:'-
.add Signafur,,es,.. Whei;tevetr a;pef.so.w:si~ Q::P: b~baff Qf: or forJhe Corp0ra:tioJJ; they should
their title nextto·the ``~-that it Will be' oleai tba.l they are iiC:tifig:as-atu1gent ofthe
·``=ra:rd::f:~:``~n':i!``~h!~=``:t:.~!::~:~just
C"i:\nlrJiet, ~to.u mn he held ·p~:r&~Jfy;J!a.hlie for: tbi'l ``t)ttae]; .Al13~X11mp1e l)f~ 1.'.0f'tla(':t .~igtlafure'
W()~l!I ~: . ... " . , .
Helvetia.Asset.Reoovery~ me.
(
\
n
r)
Byi~:````````````````.
... -~--·
·)<>'htr:Ooi .Presii:U;nt
l'r,~u~!{c~)~u8, Nl~u``~ lrat~actiu.R1> ttfft¥i,i#g 1J11i:. Cuiyunilluu :d1uulu bo ,
documented itr'the. minufobook by minutes ot'meetkgs,oflhe sll&eholdet:S and oftlie BO.a.rd.of : ·. ". ·-~.
Direct(>rs or other appropriate.dooutnentatfon, inelurung:· ' . .,•
Alimaj~==~;````~==~!;1~=-=~:~t::~:r~i~=·
lilp.i~·lrability h~{)kerage ~: inve~rrt ~mcounts
$oillifbe,ni.ade·ih the name artd 011
b~alf ofthc Corporation an&willi.fuereqilifed qflptovaiL
'the esta.biishinentand';adJustnient.-0.fa:lhruw~,and bom:i_se~ of qffi~r.Nmd e:mpfoyee.s, if ClfiY, .. : :. '
~;
~. ~
of•ke ·-oratloi.
Cijtp . - ·; ··'
... W ... .·. .
·``~no!:d!~:=;i:``eJ!;ti'~=:~!;!['change·fu·StodfshoUJci•bereflecte-0
'.Restr:foti-Ons on fhe:fi:~fer o.f.S;iock.
,-
·''
~· ~
4
.-;·.r~· !
, •• •'!_,
•
·•.· ·--~- ..... ;..... '.".:. ". ". ;:<:--~-~-. ·- . -· .. :.·.·.-,,,. --:·;:~;.-.'!. '; : . ...... _,._,,.;.·:: .. ·. ..
: :~. ,.~ :.. ..... .:.-~ ..: .___; .....
( ··,,\ .. ; •'~:.:. -
.• ::~ •• i." .'~:.~ •
J
. .·.J - r:'.){``
•.· ....,
• · ·!n:n:u.~ .M:e~t:higsi 1-h``l)al m®:tingsmtistbe h~ld~s JH.oWd~d in t4e .EJyfaws. The
time and J)lacenrtlie annwilm~tmgtjtth.E) ;Board; drl}it¢ctoi;S;may be.changed by r~solutfon ·Qf
~ . - ~ -.~·
.~}:.:};.``
:. ·,. ~ ...•..
§f§E1ae``;~
··:)
1'\,,
•·; ~ .
helping youptq?arethe;requisite: resolutions·andJnin.utes·arrecotds to-d0cnment:any Sp¢dal. or
Rnn\ml H'i:efitJn``;. -%'.!
:;-~,``-~r~
Books-auu:M:mute:s. tn:e·Co : ·mto.n lnuiebook must be maintained and. ke tu to-
.Of!. b~ame µ,· s~elloldvt, . ~.;.~: ~ :!
·;:;r.;_,;;·
{bJ.th~·~JW4!n~lim.twd~i>~;(~}'thi:: n~'.bey qf:sl;tar!(Sirrthe Corporation ht}Id byibe • !-· :--1-. ~r:
shareholder, and (n) the ooliStdefatfon p&dfl\it the.stock. ..:; ~'
··. <:: :.: -~
"'!.'
_.k!·; ···~
Copies,of federal. statecfilld focal .infon:nati.M·or 'iil.(l()trtetax. returns. ·~, r::!}
;,:~ :·';!,::
Otheri.Corpor:ate,Matte;rs.
:Sfgnlfiettnt Chn~gtt.ll¢aS.:.·.\,•,.: _.,,:.:; •..• ~.:,;~; ...J;(•:.• ~ .•-,;:_,...,j,,,._,,,.; .,.;., .. :.,,. I'~:,
''.~
·-·~.:":·:-i.--1-~
- -:•:·.:·:J
Assumed Nanu.t lfth; C~atimtwill trans~t businesitor qperate und~r a namt that is
µtt'feremt11)m.y way !i'omi'{b.~ ~;·Ji~,~ ~(qtli;¥r·~ ~_tfll~l~·~)f''.fp``,11: tiled.wi(Q.
the Secretary of8tate,Jne~Cntperationwi1Lneedm:file m assumed .riame certifi.care; This
certillcatemust:l>efileii Witlttlie::Seeretaty;·,of State,md'the:.C.ounfy clerk ofthe county fuwhich
=``::o:~:~t``im=~fs~:~;:i~i````::::::::.:``i:``ty·
county ,?.sw.eU. Al$0, ;M:eetj:ificaie w.ill,p.e¢ ti;>-~rene~ ~i~·Six mQnth$ pri~rto its
exptrati-On.
t
.\~ .
... ·..
...
'
./ .·.,
,:,`` . . ,. . /i
•
'!
•
.;: .. :
.. · .. ,.\.
I
\. __ ;
•
., '"' ·c .•• ' "lJ:Y.LA.ws'- -'-··" ..........
-~_
BELWTt\````q,nR.¥.~'.INc~
,ARTICLkf~ OFFICE~'
l_ IiEGt.~XERit:.0 6'.Eit'Telli:AN.0 ``ENT
=tlr=SSiti~1:;;~
SeQtefufy' ofState. · ·
" • A 7
.\
3. -91'1IEI.t QV:tlel;S .
Alt'!lCLKn,:"SlIAIYrJJOLD.liiBS-
:l.. rLAtE:-o:rME:;ETING :
F.:lf.~;:J~fSSE!f~
Directors~ shareholqe1.·:rn.`` J~bysicajl;y .PIXlS~ta.t>~·i;n,e~tll.tgiQfsh~hQlc;ler~ :\>y· ~ ofre.mofo
\;UlLll.ll'J~\.iuuma;y pruti9~ h1 oc-u~hlf;I iif·6~cl:iok:fo.rl\; cmq~ m~y-~-;l"X!u~idcn;d·pl·.:;,:;.;11L ill
personaudmayvote.atameetlngtifslfu.teh.olders held ma cles;fgpated;place·orhei The ~µa.J .w~g:~y~·i;ajl~i,lby-:resr:lti:ifkn of 'the Boar.ff .ofI)Jtectors :or by ~Av.l;iti.l)g filed-
\._ /. ·withlhe·Seoretacy:·.Sfgci~il-either·hY.:a. •rit¥ ofthe·direc~;Qi W$ttareh(')lders•pwrilng·a
•
.: . ..
~·;;..;.:..;.~.;.:,; .:...-.:·_.~.~-~.:,. ~. ·.;:...:...:.~ ·-
'
·'·!~:t~t1~::~::;::I:;;:ttrii:``'ko"fi}i¢·0~6fiiti~-1````1:~ii!``i1; and·
.·Wri.tte:rv:oi: pimt.¢4 MfiM s~gfi'iith an.:y~pi,'(jpose.d.afu¢.nifuwht.t& $e. t'e~eate ·ofF.om1alden
(:·:·.~:.'i' ·``~=::``=to~::~c``;:r!``~:;~:~i~.;~a:``!~:~cord
Org;wir-?Jiops CQ!fl!! for ·thlll g1vi~g:(tf'll(IUCe ofmee'tioo~:ofsl;i.m:¢l'toldi::..ts~ If:fb.e m``~g h~ :a.~
·;=~'riiee~n:: the.pri)P.oSed.amendmeiit.ritsutlisnnW.a&·nl.ay·fa~::iootud~futhe nntice•of such.
·-dii:!1[:1rj;``·;e=:.~7:~t=~:.=::s``M:.;;:~
7
nd~=~:;~;
if{l }notice oftwo .consecutive annilltlJ meetings and all ooifues mi' meetings held:
shareh~Ider
.;:z:``. ``11;pe~.~l;lall 4iawthe sam~-ib.~ anti .effept as if
··~11rt!~!;``!it~ti!::r``f:!````````````~!£``!~1at
petson.shait~ieinsta.tciL
:~ , .' -·~ ,, • ,.. ,;.-; •.;..:., •' ·. •..• ' •. t ..., ' ... ' .... ~ . • : • - •.
·.-/
N:41~)'ed py 1he'Tex,ID!i``t.lill'fle$S ·
•
./··-~-.- .. ,\
~.. )r
-._,. ...
``~:1!.!:\~:at:.:;~as~=``=;~;:~!t````~=:~::;::a'f.
meeti:ngofsharehulrlersi.may]l(!'i;i:ak;en:Viithoutameeti.ng; without prior notice; mid'mth~ut ~
``.``, :t:~rct:~ir:1~=~::tfl``<1.':\``~;:``;``t~CG:~a·
3
sab' eci o.f:fue'co.
. ·~...... sent .
······· .... A·······
1tth~ QQrf),9~ati.9!l&'``t~ o{f``Qµ. so·pi.'QYi9~,.;my~tlQ11~i;edby·th.e Texas
Busine8s Organizatioos.:€00e·io·oo'tak.en.a't-·anyjn,1nual-or'.~per;i~ ~ting;pfsb.,arelrolders,orany ·
~=``:;``~:~:;i::n:``~=~i:``: r::::;~ii::``·::1tin~.
I \ "-- ~v~·``·
l ·' which ooldef:$::Qf aU. shares eiitlt1-ed to vote on the acti01vwere presenta.nd.'.voted.
:;!~:=:~:~:!=~=````:````````:````n.::~:!~:oi!h
shfu:drnld~r wha sq~;;:,j:}~eOMJlRl'mt., Nri,Wl'fttM :``ent i;:fene-ofth:e cOO:SenLihaU·oo
~s=``~sa````~1::
mt~lllU11~Qf'~9~f!1at,W®.l;~l?fue'~!'9``tp'``,``~JiO.lt1Mti$;t"lie ~u\ll~Qfthe:
oo.u:;eut dL"(; dclivc;1:e<"! to iii.ls Cou:iui:atieli DY, d.;;liv1;;ry to it! .ro~i5``ofti~c; lv``;b:u:cal og1.>u1i ·.
~:::ie~:;ti=::&;``=``l``~:``:£=:::~:~;~;~:e
et;:K::;``!``````1,!=~f~;:~:btJ::````=e~e:~;e~:;;:~ or
pi.inci~ ~cutive; Offi®"·dHhe, QQ!Pemti~
:mmt>t'nn'tlre:of the.·filkfu!i o.f',anyoofi.ruY.by;14bareh01'lx~h9l'&~r$'W.fi. stnfth.11t.·~foAA·nr~e.•to~
!i?Z``:?l;i;!5~£~7~.!``~t
wtes ciwt::against)iiS:.o:r h~r r,~y~l ~'.0µ~Jtfie:.sUmGient :eI~tlJim ff tb.;n cllijlnla;tively voted
to
·. ~t·~t;;~:fi~:9ftb,eJmf;4-~,,a~4 of:~f`` qr:J:fm~·``G\las``·'i;rf~e<:tuts; ~:an.election.of
·-·---``)) tht; 1:;ki.,";:;t:v'.fdkt· ~ ``· :I.(!#i;; ~W:lµrsJ~yp p~;~l~siliaj:,l:tlS'
pCtmi:tttd by ..
thc..To:i@S :B:i:l3'incaa OFgwllzi:itiom
.
COde,,,nlril.c::m"th~
... Corlilic&fo of Po~ati'qn
•
~ RES!GNA.TION
Atfit~fQ'.f..may:,~&igp,cPY pJQYiQfi.ig J:J.Qb hrwritiJl.g o.i:'by.~fe(;.ifonip tr~ssici11of'stl~l
'resignation to tb.e;COrporati°t'!ln. The resignaliionrshaJ:Lbe effectiveupdnthe date ofreceipt of the
~:~:=~=;th:``=:~e:~1:;~eh nmitz. Accepran~-nf tlie reslgnMion sh~llnot
$~. V4GANC``, 4~ Q!tt~$l!Lll'l'.NJ,tlim``.QJ.i1 '.Qtl.$(tt'Ql$.
,.
.~5-``~Si1E~r: '' ~· ..; ;. ·~ ;, .
~iigfft``~k
$Jiareh~ldel'5,, ·· ·
(~,).
==~r~=~=s::;~
of``l~ or·;~eri~ lQ;.beii;ll~ (:iyr``Qtt Qf~.·``~-~iib. ``<\! nUtJ,t~¢f,Ofs\lclt directvr~:may: be
filled:by·th,Miffirma~e.vote:c:f amaj:ority.·oftru: ~··fh~.•:•<>w !"'ifth.4;1 hold;i.ri;
·fthe.t.rutstandmg sliares oE:SUcli. :cl&S -,l'f series oo·of suelf WollP. and·such ditedtorships shml not
.~Miy·cas¢ lie· filf~ ·~ ~ v``~fth:r:m~iDing;Qlt®tQ~ ~r1h¢"hoUl¢r8 offue ontst@~g ..
:ijillut;;i ~$)~. '~UiJl~ wd~l~hithq~W.S.1$¢ fl``;i_u~ 4JJii~ :Q~£)ii1Wa('.y 9f~W#~«a``1": .
·&.. ~lJ.~M,Jifl~G."QE~w:TOIW
::1::ri~$f!\tra~t:n``~;:;:=;:~tt:~::r~::::i~:c~
,other .bll8iness~as
shall wme meetjng, bef~:Jh~
µree.ting-of:tiw ``-timc;.~:}lla~pfltte· aqnlJaj
.
·&m:dt>.f'.nl.r®t~ts.~ay, ~ &_1~;byJe$,uli4b i;)f'tb!ii 13,o~ Qf:Ql.~c.1Pr$" ·
7~ .l.lEG.U:L¢i;R,: M``ING o~:n.i:1"JtW``s
•
·' ...• ~.;~. " .. :.
· · . ,..,. "Uie.'s~i1Uy straii d.~:~i~,~t~g~_i-*;:~t,t:;,f~&;r~;````:~;q;,~i`` d.;so
(
···--~ ~:``spem::r!'tfi°!``;;;::rors. SUcli specml .meeting sruul.be held at·the date
:';'. niilei~1t`` 1 ·M&ET1NG.S
==``=~*~;=;::;:r~h·
to~ ~QflCJ1;0Jr'fi-~of{$``t.'fiNG$:
.``&ssg;``ee~= . ..
m~miy ~· ~:an.:~ee ~·~x~cite.~:~it¢r,-0rncmce'ot!;1:~·an~.ptace·o``eting,.
no,none .t}l 1'e9 • halt .. .req, U:¢d, and;my sue!i~ng shalHre .. . . .fP,e mneand a tb.
~!``~==m~s~·
``:~:!a``:;:;``=~i~i:J:t``:::;:``:!:!:~e-Bbardbt
•
. ·``~i:~=~=:!2!~:.::~!:t``~:~==:/::;~;````n.,o!tllv
· atterldance a4;~yiji~:~fihe:!lbafd:oiDirectoiS. A director·shfil1:f!.OI be preclud,ed'fi;Qi.ll
.· • ·;-``n:·;:;~:;;tt~l``~:``;,oo~=:i~-==~i::::::``tor,
~ll``'Oll;\~tlll~.:``-S";
~tml``l1SfW~'.tlr.E~:~$E~(!F. JfiltEORlRSQJl. ~MWT'liEE
~r````:e=:=``e::nt:t;:~:~t``s~$``=rtr!::``-~e~U:d
¥ote at a meeting}
N. '.¢<>.tttMrt\t~$0~''t~ jj(i~'91f :QJ.:ijitCltQ~
"
NitcomnrlttaH>ftlie Bosrd ofDirecmts shalfhliV:e'fue· a:utho.ri;ty::Of'the::Bmrrd ofJ)irrotors in
refur¢Il.ce 'LQ? '
r,·. j
'"'·~_;_,,.:
•
·-- ~:~·``.``--·· ···-- ---- ·---
'bf·``~TI:l``~:()~:s=r~:n~f~g``ip~;iu·~.m.anner.pe~itteJ
(4}ft!co1mm:,nding wihe
~h0.14er~ the ~1ej;l~¥~f.'¥:ic~ge ~f~Uor su:bsfiµltially
illl ofth:e pra~.sriii il&uiefaoft~:'P.hli:iri~atlnn·otne~se±h~n·in tk nsmil and regulAr ~,')utOO nf
·;'*" :h·•"11~ol&e~ qftJie··Cmp(Jl:tmOJ:l'Qr t®tn:IJers9r altefimw.membets of
(1 l):fixtrtg_ w``H''9~DSatlOThnLahf'meiiibei'. ot•aJtemfilemembeFS. of such. cbniitdttee; .Or
;ptroiide``~=t:{Jf!::::.n~hli:;~;:~:ti````£·~i~w``~t'hy it¢ ``fins
==~:a?!d::i!~=°!4!!; .
:rhe,desJgnation;Ofa~mmi®ejjffutfBoo.ta·elDiteetP:tsimiQlCEtts;
===``::~:.i:~===~;tllis
4. ~RESIDENT
·•¥" •• ~ . . • · . · •• ' •
·~J!:?:r::==~!i~!``!~:Ji!.~:ft:1::::;=r:~d:e:i!olh~
:;te``~=``§::``````1t~:~;,~tJ``:;``1:,s:!``:-::ther
-officereofthe.Corporat!on:.
Tht"P:~si@nt Qt~J'V``~esi4~t$.bail '~XeGll:~ b~>UP$..n.;tP:11~g~s-amt mber-_mstnirnents .
Sf~&~£¥~:``=``
Th~f'.Pt¢S'ident shall w``f:P'Q~Qiit.l®Jrthet of·~ilfsfat;i~ connnittees.
t,=~s::``';:-~.:J:r~"::~%,':
5; VlCEi.oi?JtE$mltNJ1S:
~'VW:e``~d@,t,-~r Yj``~$i~$n``rqf'``;~ ~fi``~l1>5(1he ~4QfD1r``rs;
shall~ in the ..absence ;ordThability·oftbii·;Profilai>li'ti, pm,f'urm the dutiestmd.mccrcisc ·fut; powers.Of
( "';) the'.ireSident;.:andthev shall ue¥fonns~h etti£f,~·asiihe a9·atd.0£!J)irecrors sh~ll prescribe.
. .•
~ ..._.;··~·
i. TiiE s'EitR;J.t:tn¥·~;~s1s-rANr s.ll!~'.J!AJuEs
'f:h(} $~-~.Wm attend)_all·p:te``~f 1)~ ~ard:PfDfr``toci a.rnf,;a{Jmeetin.gs fu~· qf
-~ehPl~ ~llXd •slul.J.l.reeQrd all . vates:andthe minutes nhll •rr.r-.ee;effi.ngs. and shall perform like
;::::·~taft.m~7~t``'f~s~=~;ll````t'=l!i±lli:•:J:::i1en
-~:;:s!t~-``:.l.``````:t````vv=:u``::``=~iti:!~=~:a~:s
,am~ $e. sant~:~ 1:1,ny ``fae.qmrit1g i4;ana;w.1lt;:1r@-a``' il:``®JU:xni:Ucstqd l>ylh.e
.
S~!4:~'s:s``,or by th.¢. S.J``f~J;;s.~i~1t $~q;~.
==r~E:'.£5:!~::~
~3``~-~';=~=;::o:;m
/
j
-~-·- --·-
T#~ l'rea:sniyr``~L``b`` ``:fu.,nii&'t:tfth~ ~QJVQJ:atiQf! ~;~ybe 0.l\i~.d l;ly fM.Bolltd of
·nfrPT.tnTi;r, hki'fJ{fp'F-Oper.·vo,uC:he~ fhr !i'ileh di imn'N:P.mentA. '1'he''fTeR:s1w"'.r·i.hvtU 4"'!' AtH.f. mAint11h1
( ··:;;
~:.:::,.,.·'"'
AJlTICL)h-V: ~;Sit.UUfSr;i~]Q,PlS;'.t1.it~TIF:ICA'tEi,,.l§~y$,NCEt·``i(!'E!, ~T&~
1·.·~ l··R.n3:.0·.. F.·. ·:s·
F";T.lnrrmi'n'"'_·"'l'u.c.,
~:Jl;n;_.l ·J:.F;IA,;.;`` . . .TAC:
.u. . v':
ft •
·" .. .· .
. ·..,--········~ ... .:.. ...... _...
·~ ·~· ,~ .. ~
the Coni~ratloo ai.if.S!~ai nfactii-ofb~iness:orre¢.istered offit~:
ERE:P,,``~;i;~1\Ql:g,~l,l;llt~,Pfth~'iG1:tl'J!O~tl9:q;``l ~i;ip~n ~l:w fa~ ``oti
{r)~}h~ ciir_porfuianis organmett'iiliae:ifthe:1aws ottnfa ~;
(~) :T~ilai:t¢ ~:t~Q)'.>eroi:i~tCi:Wh@·``~ •.
. ft) The:p.``4'4``"(lf $``~\ij~·@ll``f:t:h.¢;T:``J}~eii``ei.m'Jzj;i:µ_~·(;l:,41a ``````-i,·w ~i:~ tc:>'Wiset.fqrth_
Qrt ~i:lka.~ ~pr,eS~og shares ofifa~,{;orpw.irAfQti; ~ll appty-to or Mfee~ ~rtin``
:~tn:£!iE!S``#~=:::i::-:
Jn -~·even~·MY ~rrtc.rton onmur4.'!lsftlr, pr :r:egt~tt``.o:ttbe uwt.q; Q:Cl$.hare.$ sha.lfby
````rn=~===t~·'
SiS````!i:-$[:.h,
rnincipal ulaee ofbusiness.QtteIDl-1mff,-O'ffillec•a oot'Y.'.ot'°'the ~cffieCf,ftoo1hnent nr (hJ ff:such
'\, ,,
SiSt;a``;r````"!:=·
.afthe Soorerary.of'Stateat·dretime of:llie;~-:t111e Cofitrirdtiiin whit_hfaik:Withh1 a
(' ~--··-· ··-·--·····
4.
·AR.'l'l(jLifr.VI .... DIVID\ENDAND DISTRIRUTIONS
l. DECLARAT10l'l
T~(jl 60~¢9fµi~t.or~i:®lYQ®J~ .~anr· ``' I'.e&~ 9f!$P®jR!' ~¢litjg;~Jthe :\;IQard of
Direct0m and tJie,CfoJ]Omli.cm ma.yJ1ay; divideaa~ 01rth~eutstanmng'fiharesJn cash~:prop.E\rty:oI
.tn th~ shar~ ~fth6. CQip~oti·fuithU*t$i1.~p~itriltted'~{artds\lbjtcHo ilie pio~fons·o~ tile·
law.R oftb~:stat~·~f Tex~> ·: - · .
•
Alll\lUl.Ym~·~€-@t.~EQUS
· l;. ~0.~.~CU.Q~··
t W,~ :OF NOTICE
W~er ·ar:.y nafi¢¢;fac1ieq~w ~gii~n:t9'~;~efJ;~1~·1'.it :~tff'Oftbe-t``ot.r.
~ttile- pro,'ds.iens «ft\11:..T~'n.u~ss·O.``efrons·O~®'.ortmTHER.BM:o~J.J ¢.O~tA'rlONS'i1ildHNotO@t
!i.; ~·
Tutt.:Cotpm~on m~ ·Q(jQpH\''oo'fPOtate s.~aCUi:suGfi t.bmu$ t~lfuani ii>fD~erol'S may .
d. te.rfuin:· ·
iflfu,CJ~mioo ~·· ·ot::~ r.~ult® t0:u:re·tbe ~rim}~ ~JM,:hwk.0ftl e
``:``;;}Uifr``t~i~t-J``. ``4•ttin~@t;gt.otneffus``t.``~uted.~y``
'Coil'Ot.atiott;; '
'.6~ :Q:mtCK$~:DRAFTS,,:ETC.
``:````':``=~:.::.:~:;:!``:!!.~te~:/:``=~:r;;:1 be .
~e;.~:·``;&r. R.``1@.~!'J:"t)t``J¥¥i;\t4.~:ft:t``k``'
7~· -``qAL, XEA.R.
Titdiscai;.eatQf''tbe;C-Oqlonmnn shaltb.e'as :determine(fby the ~ar:..
· u.:Y,.·l&i.·~raftb:eseQ;j\ttsust ~ 20QJ~.
~=
..•
\: '·'°
•
\
1
:~
t
J
·.'!
··. ~/'
•
----- . ··-----· -------------------
EXHIBIT J
MINUTES OF THE ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING OF
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
HELVETIA ASSET RECOVERY, INC.
A FOR-PROFIT CORPORATION
The organizational meeting of the Board of Directors of Helvetia Asset Recovery, Inc., a Texas
business corporation (hereinafter "Business Corporation"). was held at 1715 Hadbury Lane, San
Antoruo, Texas 18248, on August 8, :LUU"/.
The undersigned, being the sole member of the initial Board of Directors of Helvetia Asset
Recovery, Im;;. ruuni;d .U1 tht: Businc::.-s Coiporatiou'~ Cc::ttific