in the Interest of L.J.K. and C.A.K., Children ( 2021 )


Menu:
  •                                                                                          FILE COPY
    Fourth Court of Appeals
    San Antonio, Texas
    December 16, 2021
    No. 04-20-00596-CV
    IN THE INTEREST OF L.J.K. AND C.A.K., CHILDREN
    From the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
    Trial Court No. 2018CI01008
    Honorable Mary Lou Alvarez, Judge Presiding
    ORDER
    On December 14, 2021, appellee filed a motion to dismiss for                      want   of
    jurisdiction. Appellee contends appellant’s notice of appeal was not timely.
    The trial court signed the judgment on August 26, 2020. Because appellant timely filed a
    motion for new trial, the notice of appeal was due on November 24, 2020. Although the notice
    of appeal was provided by this court to the trial court on December 14, 2020, appellant filed his
    notice of appeal in this court on December 11, 2020. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.1(a) (“An appeal is
    perfected when a written notice of appeal is filed with the trial court clerk. If a notice of appeal
    is mistakenly filed with the appellate court, the notice is deemed to have been filed the same day
    with the trial court clerk, and the appellate clerk must immediately send the trial court clerk a
    copy of the notice.” (emphasis added)). The fifteen-day extension of time in which to file the
    notice of appeal expired on December 9, 2020. The envelope in which appellant mailed his
    notice of appeal is date-stamped December 7, 2020. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 5 (“If any document is
    sent to the proper clerk by first-class United States mail in an envelope or wrapper properly
    addressed and stamped and is deposited in the mail on or before the last day for filing same, the
    same, if received by the clerk not more than ten days tardily, shall be filed by the clerk and be
    deemed filed in time. A legible postmark affixed by the United States Postal Service shall be
    prima facie evidence of the date of mailing.”).
    Although appellant mailed his notice of appeal within the fifteen-day grace period
    allowed by Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.3, he did not file a motion for extension of time. A
    motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when an appellant, acting in good faith, files
    a notice of appeal beyond the time allowed by Rule 26.1 but within the fifteen-day grace period
    provided by Rule 26.3 for filing a motion for extension of time. See Verburgt v. Dorner, 
    959 S.W.2d 615
    , 617 (Tex. 1997) (construing the predecessor to Rule 26). However, the appellant
    must offer a reasonable explanation for failing to file the notice of appeal in a timely
    manner. See id.; TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3, 10.5(b)(1)(C).
    Because this court did not provide appellant with an opportunity to offer a reasonable
    explanation, in the interest of justice, we do so now. It is therefore ORDERED that appellant
    FILE COPY
    file, no later than December 31, 2021, a response presenting a reasonable explanation for
    failing to file the notice of appeal in a timely manner. If appellant fails to respond within the
    time provided, the appeal will be dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). All other appellate
    deadlines are suspended until further order of this court. Appellee’s motion to dismiss is HELD
    IN ABEYANCE pending further order of this court.
    _________________________________
    Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice
    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
    court on this 16th day of December, 2021.
    ___________________________________
    MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-20-00596-CV

Filed Date: 12/16/2021

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 12/21/2021