Joshua Denagelo Myles v. State ( 2018 )


Menu:
  •                                  COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE
    FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
    ORDER
    Appellate case name:      Joshua Denagelo Myles v. The State of Texas
    Appellate case number:    01-17-00483-CR             Trial court case number:     1522818
    Trial court:              262nd District Court of Harris County
    Appellant Joshua Denagelo Myles’s court-appointed counsel filed a brief
    concluding that the above-referenced appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
    , 744, 
    87 S. Ct. 1396
    , 1400 (1967). Counsel has not, however, filed a letter in
    accordance with Kelly v. State, 
    436 S.W.3d 313
     (Tex. Crim. App. 2014), “to notify his
    client that, should he wish to exercise his right to review the appellate record in preparing
    to file a response to the Anders brief, he should immediately file a motion for pro se access
    to the appellate record with the applicable court of appeals,” which letter includes “a form
    motion . . ., lacking only the appellant’s signature and the date, . . . inform[ing] the appellant
    that, in order to effectuate his right to review the appellate record pro se, should he choose
    to invoke it, he must sign and date the motion and send it on to the court of appeals within
    ten days of the date of the letter from appellate counsel.” 436 S.W.3d at 319–20.
    Accordingly, we order appellant’s appointed counsel, Terrence Gaiser, to send a
    letter and a form motion, such as the motion attached to this order, to the appellant in
    accordance with Kelly. Id. We further order appellant’s appointed counsel to notify us, in
    writing, “that he has (1) informed the appellant of the motion to withdraw, (2) provided the
    appellant with the requisite copies while notifying him of his various pro se rights, and (3)
    supplied him with a form motion for pro se access to the appellate record.” Id. at 320.
    Counsel shall send the required letter to his client and shall file the required notice with the
    Clerk of this Court within 14 days of the date of this order.
    It is so ORDERED.
    Judge’s signature: /s/ Jennifer Caughey
    X Acting individually     Acting for the Court
    Date: August 14, 2018
    Return to:
    First Court of Appeals
    301 Fannin Street
    Houston, Texas 77002
    No. 01-___-__________-CR
    _________________                          §                   COURT OF APPEALS
    §                   1ST DISTRICT
    The State of Texas                         §                   HOUSTON, TEXAS
    Pro se Motion for Access to Appellate Record
    To the Honorable Justices of Said Court:
    Appellant’s appointed counsel has filed a brief in the above styled and numbered
    cause pursuant to Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
     (1967).
    Appellant now moves this Court to provide him with a copy of the appellate
    record including the clerk’s record and the court reporter’s record for use in preparing his
    pro se response to counsel’s brief.
    Appellant requests an extension of time of 30 days from the granting of this
    motion to file a pro se response to counsel’s Anders brief.
    Respectfully submitted,
    _______________________
    Pro se Appellant
    _____________ Unit,TDCJ # __________
    ____________, Texas _______
    Certificate of Service
    This is to certify that on ____________, a true and correct copy of the above and
    foregoing document was served by mail on the Harris County District Attorney’s Office
    at 1201 Franklin Street #600, Houston, Texas 77002.
    _______________________
    Pro se Appellant
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 01-17-00483-CR

Filed Date: 8/14/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 8/15/2018