Chad Small v. State ( 2014 )


Menu:
  • Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed September 4, 2014.
    In The
    Fourteenth Court of Appeals
    NO. 14-14-00653-CR
    CHAD SMALL, Appellant
    V.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
    On Appeal from the 263rd District Court
    Harris County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause No. 1349798
    MEMORANDUM                           OPINION
    This is an attempted appeal of an order granting the State’s motion to
    dismiss. The State filed a motion to dismiss in trial court cause number 1349798
    because appellant was convicted in trial court cause numbers 1383973 and
    1349797.1
    Generally, an appellate court only has jurisdiction to consider an appeal by a
    criminal defendant where there has been a final judgment of conviction. Workman
    1
    In his notice of appeal appellant states he has been granted permission to appeal by the
    trial court. Such notice, however, does not appear in the record before this court.
    v. State, 
    170 Tex. Crim. 621
    , 
    343 S.W.2d 446
    , 447 (1961); McKown v. State, 
    915 S.W.2d 160
    , 161 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1996, no pet.).
    An order granting the State’s motion to dismiss is not a separately
    appealable order. Because this appeal does not fall within the exceptions to the
    general rule that appeal may be taken only from a final judgment of conviction, we
    have no jurisdiction.
    In addition, the order appellant attempts to appeal was signed May 9, 2014,
    but the notice of appeal was not filed until July 28, 2014. A defendant’s notice of
    appeal must be filed within thirty days after sentence is imposed when the
    defendant has not filed a motion for new trial. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1). If an
    appeal is not timely perfected, a court of appeals does not obtain jurisdiction to
    address the merits of the appeal. Under those circumstances it can take no action
    other than to dismiss the appeal. Slaton v. State, 
    981 S.W.2d 208
    , 210 (Tex. Crim.
    App. 1998).
    Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.
    PER CURIAM
    Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Jamison, and Donovan.
    Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-14-00653-CR

Filed Date: 9/4/2014

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014