Daniel Deanthony Felder v. State ( 2015 )

Affirmed and Opinion Filed November 4, 2015
In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-14-01031-CR
No. 05-14-01032-CR
No. 05-14-01033-CR
DANIEL DEANTHONY FELDER, JR., Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 5
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause Nos. F14-52047-L, F14-52048-L, F14-52049-L
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Lang, Evans, and Whitehill
Opinion by Justice Whitehill
Daniel DeAnthony Felder, Jr. waived a jury and pleaded guilty to three offenses of
aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 29.03(a)(2) (West
2011). The trial court assessed punishment at fifteen years’ imprisonment in each case.
On appeal, appellant’s attorney filed a brief in which she concludes the appeals are
wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in
effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811–12
(Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We
advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response, but he did not file a pro se response. See
Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319–21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (identifying duties of appellate
courts and counsel in Anders cases).
We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824,
826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court’s duty in Anders cases). We agree
the appeals are frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably
support the appeals.
Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s judgments.
Do Not Publish
TEX. R. APP. P. 47
141031F.P05
/Bill Whitehill/
BILL WHITEHILL
JUSTICE
‐2‐
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT
DANIEL DEANTHONY FELDER, JR., Appeal from the Criminal District Court
Appellant No. 5 of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No.
F14-52047-L).
No. 05-14-01031-CR V. Opinion delivered by Justice Whitehill,
Justices Lang and Evans participating.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
Judgment entered November 4, 2015
‐3‐
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT
DANIEL DEANTHONY FELDER, JR., Appeal from the Criminal District Court
Appellant No. 5 of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No.
F14-52048-L).
No. 05-14-01032-CR V. Opinion delivered by Justice Whitehill,
Justices Lang and Evans participating.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
Judgment entered November 4, 2015.
‐4‐
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT
DANIEL DEANTHONY FELDER, JR., Appeal from the Criminal District Court
Appellant No. 5 of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No.
F14-52049-L).
No. 05-14-01033-CR V. Opinion delivered by Justice Whitehill,
Justices Lang and Evans participating.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
Judgment entered November 4, 2015.
‐5‐