Ramon Garcia v. State ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                                Fourth Court of Appeals
    San Antonio, Texas
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    No. 04-13-00890-CR
    Ramon GARCIA,
    Appellant
    v.
    The STATE of
    The STATE of Texas,
    Appellee
    From the 218th Judicial District Court, Atascosa County, Texas
    Trial Court No. 11-03-0040 CRA
    Honorable Donna S. Rayes, Judge Presiding
    Opinion by:       Catherine Stone, Chief Justice
    Sitting:          Catherine Stone, Chief Justice
    Karen Angelini, Justice
    Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
    Delivered and Filed: September 10, 2014
    AFFIRMED
    Ramon Garcia entered an open plea of no contest to possession of 50 to 2,000 pounds of
    marijuana. The offense is a second degree felony; however, it was enhanced to a first degree
    felony by a prior conviction of possession of 50 to 2,000 pounds of marijuana. Garcia was
    sentenced to ten years imprisonment.
    Garcia’s court-appointed attorney filed a brief containing a professional evaluation of the
    record in accordance with Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
     (1967). Counsel concludes that the
    appeal has no merit. Counsel provided Garcia with a copy of the brief and informed him of his
    04-13-00890-CR
    right to review the record and file his own brief. See Nichols v. State, 
    954 S.W.2d 83
    , 85-86 (Tex.
    App.—San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State, 
    924 S.W.2d 176
    , 177 n.1 (Tex. App.—San
    Antonio 1996, no pet.). Garcia did not file a pro se brief.
    After reviewing the record and counsel’s brief, we agree that the appeal is frivolous and
    without merit. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Appellate counsel’s request to withdraw
    is granted. Nichols, 954 S.W.2d at 86; Bruns, 924 S.W.2d at 177 n.1. No substitute counsel will
    be appointed. Should Garcia wish to seek further review of this case by the Texas Court of
    Criminal Appeals, Garcia must either retain an attorney to file a petition for discretionary review
    or Garcia must file a pro se petition for discretionary review. Any petition for discretionary review
    must be filed within thirty days from the later of: (1) the date of this opinion; or (2) the date the
    last timely motion for rehearing is overruled by this court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.2. Any petition
    for discretionary review must be filed in the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. See TEX. R. APP.
    P. 68.3. Any petition for discretionary review should comply with the requirements of Rule 68.4
    of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.4.
    Catherine Stone, Chief Justice
    DO NOT PUBLISH
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-13-00890-CR

Filed Date: 9/10/2014

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014