Antorr Lamar Allison v. State ( 2014 )

Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-13-00765-CR
Antorr Lamar ALLISON,
Appellant
v.
The State of
The STATE of Texas,
Appellee
From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2013CR0418
Honorable Dick Alcala, Judge Presiding
Opinion by: Karen Angelini, Justice
Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice
Karen Angelini, Justice
Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
Delivered and Filed: September 17, 2014
AFFIRMED; MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED
On April 8, 2013, pursuant to a plea-bargain agreement, Antorr Lamar Allison was
sentenced to two years in prison, his sentence was suspended, and he was placed on community
supervision for two years. On July 31, 2013, the State filed a motion to revoke Allison’s
community supervision, alleging Allison had violated two conditions of his community
supervision. After a hearing, the trial court found that Allison had violated a condition of his
community supervision. The trial court revoked Allison’s community supervision and sentenced
him to two years in prison. Allison appealed.
04-13-00765-CR
Allison’s court-appointed counsel has filed a brief in which he discusses two potential
points of error but nevertheless concludes that this appeal is frivolous and without merit. See
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).
Counsel states that Allison was provided with copies of the brief and the motion to withdraw, and
was further informed of his right to review the record and file his own brief. See Bruns v. State,
924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n. 1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1996, no pet.). Allison has not filed a pro se
brief.
We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief, and we agree that this appeal is frivolous
and without merit. The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed. Furthermore, we grant the
motion to withdraw. See Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 85–86 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1997,
no pet.); Bruns, 924 S.W.2d at 177 n. 1.
No substitute counsel will be appointed. Should Allison wish to seek further review of this
case by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, he must either retain an attorney to file a petition for
discretionary review or file a pro se petition for discretionary review. Any petition for discretionary
review must be filed within thirty days from the later of (1) the date of this opinion; or (2) the date
the last timely motion for rehearing is overruled by this court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.2. Any
petition for discretionary review must be filed in the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. See TEX.
R. APP. P. 68.3. Any petition for discretionary review should comply with the requirements of Rule
68.4 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.4.
Karen Angelini, Justice
DO NOT PUBLISH
-2-