Nancy Alanis v. Wells Fargo Bank NA, as Trustee ( 2019 )


Menu:
  •                             Fourth Court of Appeals
    San Antonio, Texas
    August 14, 2019
    No. 04-19-00461-CV
    Nancy ALANIS,
    Appellant
    v.
    WELLS FARGO BANK NA, as Trustee,
    Appellee
    From the County Court at Law No. 10, Bexar County, Texas
    Trial Court No. 2019-CV-00584
    Honorable David J. Rodriguez, Judge Presiding
    ORDER
    The clerk’s record has been filed. It shows this appeal concerns a forcible detainer action.
    The appealed judgment orders that appellee recover possession of the property. The clerk’s
    record shows appellant timely posted an appeal bond in the amount set by the trial court.
    However, the trial court thereafter issued a writ of possession.
    Jurisdictional defects cannot be waived, and such defects in the appellate court and in the
    trial court may be noted by the appellate court sua sponte. See Tex. Ass’n. of Bus. v. Tex. Air
    Control Bd., 
    852 S.W.2d 440
    , 445–46 (Tex.1993). Courts lack jurisdiction when an issue or
    dispute becomes moot. Briones v. Brazos Bend Villa Apts., 
    438 S.W.3d 808
    , 812 (Tex. App.—
    Houston [14th Dist.] 2014, no pet.). “Judgment of possession in a forcible detainer action is not
    intended to be a final determination of whether the eviction is wrongful; rather, it is a
    determination of the right to immediate possession.” Marshall v. Hous. Auth. of City of San
    Antonio, 
    198 S.W.3d 782
    , 787 (Tex. 2006). The issue of possession in a forcible detainer action
    can become moot if the appellant is no longer in possession, and the appellant does not have a
    potentially meritorious claim of right to current, actual possession. See 
    Briones, 438 S.W.3d at 812
    . When the issue of possession becomes moot, we will vacate the trial court’s judgment and
    dismiss the case. 
    Marshall, 198 S.W.3d at 790
    ; see, e.g., Molina v. Stonegate Mortgage Corp.,
    No. 04-16-00520-CV, 
    2016 WL 6885810
    , at *1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio Nov. 23, 2016, no
    pet.) (mem. op.).
    We therefore ORDER appellant to file a response in this court by September 3, 2019
    showing why the issue of possession is not moot. A failure to timely respond and address the
    noted jurisdictional defect will result in a dismissal of this appeal. If a supplemental clerk’s
    record is necessary, appellant must (a) ask the trial court clerk to prepare the record, and (b)
    notify this court that such a request was made. We further ORDER the appellate deadlines
    suspended until further order of this court.
    _________________________________
    Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
    court on this 14th day of August, 2019.
    ___________________________________
    Keith E. Hottle,
    Clerk of Court
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-19-00461-CV

Filed Date: 8/14/2019

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 8/15/2019