Chevron Phillips Chemical Company LP v. Kingwood CrossRoads, L.P. ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                                      In The
    Court of Appeals
    Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
    ____________________
    NO. 09-14-00316-CV
    ____________________
    CHEVRON PHILLIPS CHEMICAL COMPANY LP, Appellant
    V.
    KINGWOOD CROSSROADS, L.P., Appellee
    _______________________________________________________           ______________
    On Appeal from the 410th District Court
    Montgomery County, Texas
    Trial Cause No. 14-04-04123 CV
    ________________________________________________________           _____________
    ORDER
    Chevron Phillips Chemical Company LP (“CP Chem”) filed a motion to
    abate the appeal and to remand the case to the trial court for entry of findings of
    fact and conclusions of law. In an earlier appeal from the underlying trial, the
    appellate court reversed part of the judgment on the jury’s verdict and remanded
    the case to the trial court “for determination of the amount of attorneys’ fees
    Kingwood CrossRoads[, L.P.] is entitled to recover for its defense of CP Chem’s
    breach-of-contract claim.” See Chevron Phillips Chem. Co. LP v. Kingwood
    1
    CrossRoads, L.P., 
    346 S.W.3d 37
    , 78 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2011, pet.
    denied). The Court of Appeals instructed that the case was remanded “for
    Kingwood CrossRoads to segregate these fees or demonstrate segregation is not
    required and for the trial court to determine the amount of fees recoverable for
    defense of CP Chem’s contract claim.” 
    Id. at 70.
    On remand, the trial court
    determined that the amount of attorneys’ fees recoverable by Kingwood
    Crossroads, L.P. (“KCR”) for its defense of CP Chem’s contract claim is
    $2,648,101.50 plus post-judgment interest and additional sums in the event of
    further appeals. The trial court denied CP Chem’s request for findings of fact and
    conclusions of law. In its response filed in opposition to the appellant’s motion to
    abate, KCR argues that CP Chem is not entitled to findings of fact and conclusions
    of law because the proceeding on remand was not evidentiary in nature.
    We abate the appeal and remand the case to the trial court for entry of
    findings of fact and conclusions of law. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 298. If the trial court
    resolved all issues as questions of law, without deciding any facts, it shall so state
    in its conclusions of law. The trial court shall allow the parties ten days after the
    trial court signs its findings of fact and conclusions of law to request additional
    findings and conclusions. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 298. The appeal is abated and all
    appellate timetables are suspended while the case is before the trial court. A
    2
    supplemental record, including any findings of fact made by the trial court and the
    trial court’s conclusions of law, any additional findings and conclusions requested
    by the parties, and any additional or amended findings and conclusions made by
    the trial court, shall be filed with the Court of Appeals by October 28, 2014. The
    appeal will be reinstated without further order of this Court when the supplemental
    clerk’s record is filed. The brief of the appellant shall be due thirty days after the
    supplemental clerk’s record is filed with the Court of Appeals.
    ORDER ENTERED September 18, 2014.
    PER CURIAM
    Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 09-14-00316-CV

Filed Date: 9/18/2014

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014