in Re Nkrumah Lamumba Valier ( 2017 )


Menu:
  • Opinion issued April 25, 2017
    In The
    Court of Appeals
    For The
    First District of Texas
    ————————————
    NO. 01-17-00006-CR
    ———————————
    IN RE NKRUMAH LAMUMBA VALIER, Relator
    Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Relator, Nkrumah Lamumba Valier, incarcerated and proceeding pro se, has
    filed a petition for a writ of mandamus.1 Relator seeks issuance of a writ to compel
    respondent, the Honorable Vanessa Velasquez, to rule on post-conviction motions,
    including a motion to void his felony conviction for aggravated sexual assault.
    1
    The underlying case is The State of Texas v. Nkrumah Lamumba Valier, Cause No.
    1150625, in the 183rd District Court of Harris County, the Honorable Vanessa
    Velasquez presiding.
    Relator seeks relief from a final felony conviction. See Valier v. State, No.
    01-08-00975-CR, 
    2011 WL 5428861
    (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Nov. 10,
    2011, pet. ref’d) (affirming conviction). Because his petition involves a final
    post-conviction felony proceeding, article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal
    Procedure governs and provides the exclusive means to challenge the conviction.
    See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07 (Vernon 2015); Padieu v. Court of
    Appeals of Tex., Fifth Dist., 
    392 S.W.3d 115
    , 117 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013) (citations
    omitted); Bd. of Pardons & Paroles ex rel. Keene v. Court of Appeals for Eighth
    Dist., 
    910 S.W.2d 481
    , 483 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995) (citation omitted). Only the
    Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has jurisdiction in final post-conviction
    proceedings. In re McAfee, 
    53 S.W.3d 715
    , 717 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.]
    2001, orig. proceeding) (citation omitted); see In re Briscoe, 
    230 S.W.3d 196
    , 196–
    97 (Tex. App.–Houston [14th Dist.] 2006, orig. proceeding) (“Article 11.07 contains
    no role for the courts of appeals.”). Accordingly, we do not have jurisdiction over
    relator’s mandamus petition.
    We dismiss the petition for lack of jurisdiction.
    PER CURIAM
    Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Higley, and Massengale.
    Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 01-17-00006-CR

Filed Date: 4/25/2017

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 4/26/2017